Against Empathy?

It is taken as a self-evident truth that it is a good thing for medical students and practitioners to develop and exhibit empathy in their clinical encounters. In 2016 the psychologist Paul Bloom published a work of popular psychology entitled, provocatively, "Against Empathy. The Case for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Trevor Thompson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: F1000 Research Ltd 2018-09-01
Series:MedEdPublish
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/1959
_version_ 1811331397904760832
author Trevor Thompson
author_facet Trevor Thompson
author_sort Trevor Thompson
collection DOAJ
description It is taken as a self-evident truth that it is a good thing for medical students and practitioners to develop and exhibit empathy in their clinical encounters. In 2016 the psychologist Paul Bloom published a work of popular psychology entitled, provocatively, "Against Empathy. The Case for Rational Compassion". In this book he takes a strong line against empathy, arguing that it is not only not useful, but positively detrimental to human progress. Empathy, in the way Bloom defines it, leads to biased, shorted-sighted an practically useless action. In this essay I enjoy flirting with this broadside attack on one of our sacred cows. But I also a discover a major mismatch between what educationalists typically think of as empathy and the version presented by the author. The essay reviews this complex definitional landscape, visiting terms like pity, sympathy, moral imagination and compassion as well as the major varients of empathy itself. If we are going to avoid some of the evident pitfalls of emotion-dominated empathic responses, it really does help to be clear on what it is we have in mind when we discuss, teach and practice empathy.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T16:20:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6dbc671332414f7790170016005b6888
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2312-7996
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T16:20:07Z
publishDate 2018-09-01
publisher F1000 Research Ltd
record_format Article
series MedEdPublish
spelling doaj.art-6dbc671332414f7790170016005b68882022-12-22T02:39:57ZengF1000 Research LtdMedEdPublish2312-79962018-09-0173Against Empathy?Trevor Thompson0University of BristolIt is taken as a self-evident truth that it is a good thing for medical students and practitioners to develop and exhibit empathy in their clinical encounters. In 2016 the psychologist Paul Bloom published a work of popular psychology entitled, provocatively, "Against Empathy. The Case for Rational Compassion". In this book he takes a strong line against empathy, arguing that it is not only not useful, but positively detrimental to human progress. Empathy, in the way Bloom defines it, leads to biased, shorted-sighted an practically useless action. In this essay I enjoy flirting with this broadside attack on one of our sacred cows. But I also a discover a major mismatch between what educationalists typically think of as empathy and the version presented by the author. The essay reviews this complex definitional landscape, visiting terms like pity, sympathy, moral imagination and compassion as well as the major varients of empathy itself. If we are going to avoid some of the evident pitfalls of emotion-dominated empathic responses, it really does help to be clear on what it is we have in mind when we discuss, teach and practice empathy.https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/1959Empathysympathycompassion
spellingShingle Trevor Thompson
Against Empathy?
MedEdPublish
Empathy
sympathy
compassion
title Against Empathy?
title_full Against Empathy?
title_fullStr Against Empathy?
title_full_unstemmed Against Empathy?
title_short Against Empathy?
title_sort against empathy
topic Empathy
sympathy
compassion
url https://www.mededpublish.org/Manuscripts/1959
work_keys_str_mv AT trevorthompson againstempathy