Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Instantaneous Wave‐Free Ratio in Assessment of Lesion Hemodynamic Significance and Explanation of their Discrepancies. International, Multicenter and Prospective Trial: The FiGARO Study

Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Instantaneous Wave‐Free Ratio in Assessment of Lesion Hemodynamic Significance and Explanation of their Discrepancies. International, Multicenter and Prospective Trial: The FiGARO Study

Background The FiGARO (FFR versus iFR in Assessment of Hemodynamic Lesion Significance, and an Explanation of Their Discrepancies) trial is a prospective registry searching for predictors of fractional flow reserve/instantaneous wave‐free ratio (FFR/iFR) discrepancy. Methods and Results FFR/iFR were...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tomas Kovarnik, Matsuo Hitoshi, Ales Kral, Stepan Jerabek, David Zemanek, Yoshiaki Kawase, Hiroyuki Omori, Toru Tanigaki, Jan Pudil, Alexandra Vodzinska, Marian Branny, Roman Stipal, Petr Kala, Jan Mrozek, Martin Porzer, Tomas Grezl, Kamil Novobilsky, Oscar Mendiz, Karel Kopriva, Martin Mates, Martin Chval, Zhi Chen, Pavel Martasek, Ales Linhart
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-05-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
coronary flow reserve
fractional flow reserve
instantaneous wave‐free ratio
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.121.021490

Internet

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.121.021490

Similar Items