Hymenoptera venom allergy in outdoor workers: Occupational exposure, clinical features and effects of allergen immunotherapy

Objectives. To describe (i) the clinical characteristics of workers, exposed to hymenoptera stings, with an ascertained diagnosis of Hymenoptera Venom Allergy (HVA), (ii) the specific role of occupational exposure, (iii) the effect of Venom Immunotherapy (VIT) in reducing the severity of allergic ep...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alessandra Toletone, Susanna Voltolini, Giovanni Passalacqua, Guglielmo Dini, Donatella Bignardi, Paola Minale, Emanuela Massa, Alessio Signori, Costantino Troise, Paolo Durando
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2017-02-01
Series:Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2017.1264748
_version_ 1797674550829252608
author Alessandra Toletone
Susanna Voltolini
Giovanni Passalacqua
Guglielmo Dini
Donatella Bignardi
Paola Minale
Emanuela Massa
Alessio Signori
Costantino Troise
Paolo Durando
author_facet Alessandra Toletone
Susanna Voltolini
Giovanni Passalacqua
Guglielmo Dini
Donatella Bignardi
Paola Minale
Emanuela Massa
Alessio Signori
Costantino Troise
Paolo Durando
author_sort Alessandra Toletone
collection DOAJ
description Objectives. To describe (i) the clinical characteristics of workers, exposed to hymenoptera stings, with an ascertained diagnosis of Hymenoptera Venom Allergy (HVA), (ii) the specific role of occupational exposure, (iii) the effect of Venom Immunotherapy (VIT) in reducing the severity of allergic episodes in workers exposed to repeated stings of hymenoptera, and (iv) the management of the occupational consequences caused by allergic reactions due to hymenoptera stings. Methods. Between 2000 and 2013 an observational study, including patients referred to the regional reference hospital of Liguria, Italy, with an ascertained diagnosis of HVA and treated with VIT, was performed. A structured questionnaire was administered to all patients to investigate the occupational features of allergic reactions. These were graded according to standard systems in patients at the first episode, and after re-stings, during VIT. Results. One-hundred and 8four out of the 202 patients referred had a complete data set. In 32 (17.4%) patients, the allergic reaction occurred during work activities performed outdoor. Of these, 31.2% previously stung by hymenoptera at work, and receiving VIT, were re-stung during occupational activity. The grades of reaction developed under VIT treatment resulted clinically less severe than of those occurred at the first sting (p-value = 0.031). Conclusion. Our findings confirmed the clinical relevance of HVA, and described its occupational features in outdoor workers with sensitization, stressing the importance of an early identification and proper management of the professional categories recognized at high risk of hymenoptera stings. The Occupational Physician should be supported by other specialists to recommend appropriate diagnostic procedures and the prescription of VIT, which resulted an effective treatment for the prevention of episodes of severe reactions in workers with a proven HVA.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T22:00:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6dcb1ff7f10b496f9be0ea4a75f040ee
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2164-5515
2164-554X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T22:00:39Z
publishDate 2017-02-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
spelling doaj.art-6dcb1ff7f10b496f9be0ea4a75f040ee2023-09-25T11:02:54ZengTaylor & Francis GroupHuman Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics2164-55152164-554X2017-02-0113247748310.1080/21645515.2017.12647481264748Hymenoptera venom allergy in outdoor workers: Occupational exposure, clinical features and effects of allergen immunotherapyAlessandra Toletone0Susanna Voltolini1Giovanni Passalacqua2Guglielmo Dini3Donatella Bignardi4Paola Minale5Emanuela Massa6Alessio Signori7Costantino Troise8Paolo Durando9Postgraduate School in Occupational Medicine and Occupational Medicine Unit, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, University of GenoaAllergy Unit, IRCCS AOU San Martino-ISTIRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, University of GenoaPostgraduate School in Occupational Medicine and Occupational Medicine Unit, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, University of GenoaAllergy Unit, IRCCS AOU San Martino-ISTAllergy Unit, IRCCS AOU San Martino-ISTPostgraduate School in Occupational Medicine and Occupational Medicine Unit, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, University of GenoaUniversity of GenoaAllergy Unit, IRCCS AOU San Martino-ISTPostgraduate School in Occupational Medicine and Occupational Medicine Unit, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, University of GenoaObjectives. To describe (i) the clinical characteristics of workers, exposed to hymenoptera stings, with an ascertained diagnosis of Hymenoptera Venom Allergy (HVA), (ii) the specific role of occupational exposure, (iii) the effect of Venom Immunotherapy (VIT) in reducing the severity of allergic episodes in workers exposed to repeated stings of hymenoptera, and (iv) the management of the occupational consequences caused by allergic reactions due to hymenoptera stings. Methods. Between 2000 and 2013 an observational study, including patients referred to the regional reference hospital of Liguria, Italy, with an ascertained diagnosis of HVA and treated with VIT, was performed. A structured questionnaire was administered to all patients to investigate the occupational features of allergic reactions. These were graded according to standard systems in patients at the first episode, and after re-stings, during VIT. Results. One-hundred and 8four out of the 202 patients referred had a complete data set. In 32 (17.4%) patients, the allergic reaction occurred during work activities performed outdoor. Of these, 31.2% previously stung by hymenoptera at work, and receiving VIT, were re-stung during occupational activity. The grades of reaction developed under VIT treatment resulted clinically less severe than of those occurred at the first sting (p-value = 0.031). Conclusion. Our findings confirmed the clinical relevance of HVA, and described its occupational features in outdoor workers with sensitization, stressing the importance of an early identification and proper management of the professional categories recognized at high risk of hymenoptera stings. The Occupational Physician should be supported by other specialists to recommend appropriate diagnostic procedures and the prescription of VIT, which resulted an effective treatment for the prevention of episodes of severe reactions in workers with a proven HVA.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2017.1264748hymenoptera-venom allergy (hva)venom immunotherapy (vit)allergen immunotherapyanaphylaxisoccupational allergypreventionoutdoor workers
spellingShingle Alessandra Toletone
Susanna Voltolini
Giovanni Passalacqua
Guglielmo Dini
Donatella Bignardi
Paola Minale
Emanuela Massa
Alessio Signori
Costantino Troise
Paolo Durando
Hymenoptera venom allergy in outdoor workers: Occupational exposure, clinical features and effects of allergen immunotherapy
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
hymenoptera-venom allergy (hva)
venom immunotherapy (vit)
allergen immunotherapy
anaphylaxis
occupational allergy
prevention
outdoor workers
title Hymenoptera venom allergy in outdoor workers: Occupational exposure, clinical features and effects of allergen immunotherapy
title_full Hymenoptera venom allergy in outdoor workers: Occupational exposure, clinical features and effects of allergen immunotherapy
title_fullStr Hymenoptera venom allergy in outdoor workers: Occupational exposure, clinical features and effects of allergen immunotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Hymenoptera venom allergy in outdoor workers: Occupational exposure, clinical features and effects of allergen immunotherapy
title_short Hymenoptera venom allergy in outdoor workers: Occupational exposure, clinical features and effects of allergen immunotherapy
title_sort hymenoptera venom allergy in outdoor workers occupational exposure clinical features and effects of allergen immunotherapy
topic hymenoptera-venom allergy (hva)
venom immunotherapy (vit)
allergen immunotherapy
anaphylaxis
occupational allergy
prevention
outdoor workers
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2017.1264748
work_keys_str_mv AT alessandratoletone hymenopteravenomallergyinoutdoorworkersoccupationalexposureclinicalfeaturesandeffectsofallergenimmunotherapy
AT susannavoltolini hymenopteravenomallergyinoutdoorworkersoccupationalexposureclinicalfeaturesandeffectsofallergenimmunotherapy
AT giovannipassalacqua hymenopteravenomallergyinoutdoorworkersoccupationalexposureclinicalfeaturesandeffectsofallergenimmunotherapy
AT guglielmodini hymenopteravenomallergyinoutdoorworkersoccupationalexposureclinicalfeaturesandeffectsofallergenimmunotherapy
AT donatellabignardi hymenopteravenomallergyinoutdoorworkersoccupationalexposureclinicalfeaturesandeffectsofallergenimmunotherapy
AT paolaminale hymenopteravenomallergyinoutdoorworkersoccupationalexposureclinicalfeaturesandeffectsofallergenimmunotherapy
AT emanuelamassa hymenopteravenomallergyinoutdoorworkersoccupationalexposureclinicalfeaturesandeffectsofallergenimmunotherapy
AT alessiosignori hymenopteravenomallergyinoutdoorworkersoccupationalexposureclinicalfeaturesandeffectsofallergenimmunotherapy
AT costantinotroise hymenopteravenomallergyinoutdoorworkersoccupationalexposureclinicalfeaturesandeffectsofallergenimmunotherapy
AT paolodurando hymenopteravenomallergyinoutdoorworkersoccupationalexposureclinicalfeaturesandeffectsofallergenimmunotherapy