Evaluation of accuracy and precision of CT-guidance in Radiofrequency Ablation for osteoid osteoma in 86 patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Osteoid osteoma is a benign skeletal tumour that accounts for 2-3% of all bone tumours. The male-to-female ratio is around 4:1 and it predominates in children and young adults. The most common symptom is pain, frequently at night-time. Historically the main form of treatment h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H Nijland, J G Gerbers, S K Bulstra, J Overbosch, M Stevens, P C Jutte
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5383031?pdf=render
_version_ 1811325296670932992
author H Nijland
J G Gerbers
S K Bulstra
J Overbosch
M Stevens
P C Jutte
author_facet H Nijland
J G Gerbers
S K Bulstra
J Overbosch
M Stevens
P C Jutte
author_sort H Nijland
collection DOAJ
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Osteoid osteoma is a benign skeletal tumour that accounts for 2-3% of all bone tumours. The male-to-female ratio is around 4:1 and it predominates in children and young adults. The most common symptom is pain, frequently at night-time. Historically the main form of treatment has been surgical excision. With the development of Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) there is a percutaneus alternative. Success rates of RFA are lower but the main advantage is the minimal invasive character of the therapy and the low complication rate. As a result of the minimal invasiveness the hospitalization- and rehabilitation periods are relatively short. However, in current literature no values for accuracy and precision are known for the CT-guided positioning. METHODS:Accuracy and precision of the needle position are determined for 86 procedures. Furthermore the population is divided into groups based on tumour diameter, location and procedure outcome. RESULTS:The clinical success rate was 81.4%. In 79% of procedures complete ablation was achieved. Accuracy was 2.84 mm on average, precision was 2.94 mm. Accuracy was significantly lower in more profound lesions. Accuracy in tibia and fibula was significantly higher compared to the femur. No significant difference was found between different tumour diameters. INTERPRETATION:The accuracy and precision found are considered good. Needle position is of major importance for procedure outcomes. The question however rises how the results of this therapy will turn out in treatment of larger tumours.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T14:30:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6dcbd7ef861c4b9f939782528694a794
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T14:30:33Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-6dcbd7ef861c4b9f939782528694a7942022-12-22T02:43:11ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01124e016917110.1371/journal.pone.0169171Evaluation of accuracy and precision of CT-guidance in Radiofrequency Ablation for osteoid osteoma in 86 patients.H NijlandJ G GerbersS K BulstraJ OverboschM StevensP C JutteBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Osteoid osteoma is a benign skeletal tumour that accounts for 2-3% of all bone tumours. The male-to-female ratio is around 4:1 and it predominates in children and young adults. The most common symptom is pain, frequently at night-time. Historically the main form of treatment has been surgical excision. With the development of Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) there is a percutaneus alternative. Success rates of RFA are lower but the main advantage is the minimal invasive character of the therapy and the low complication rate. As a result of the minimal invasiveness the hospitalization- and rehabilitation periods are relatively short. However, in current literature no values for accuracy and precision are known for the CT-guided positioning. METHODS:Accuracy and precision of the needle position are determined for 86 procedures. Furthermore the population is divided into groups based on tumour diameter, location and procedure outcome. RESULTS:The clinical success rate was 81.4%. In 79% of procedures complete ablation was achieved. Accuracy was 2.84 mm on average, precision was 2.94 mm. Accuracy was significantly lower in more profound lesions. Accuracy in tibia and fibula was significantly higher compared to the femur. No significant difference was found between different tumour diameters. INTERPRETATION:The accuracy and precision found are considered good. Needle position is of major importance for procedure outcomes. The question however rises how the results of this therapy will turn out in treatment of larger tumours.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5383031?pdf=render
spellingShingle H Nijland
J G Gerbers
S K Bulstra
J Overbosch
M Stevens
P C Jutte
Evaluation of accuracy and precision of CT-guidance in Radiofrequency Ablation for osteoid osteoma in 86 patients.
PLoS ONE
title Evaluation of accuracy and precision of CT-guidance in Radiofrequency Ablation for osteoid osteoma in 86 patients.
title_full Evaluation of accuracy and precision of CT-guidance in Radiofrequency Ablation for osteoid osteoma in 86 patients.
title_fullStr Evaluation of accuracy and precision of CT-guidance in Radiofrequency Ablation for osteoid osteoma in 86 patients.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of accuracy and precision of CT-guidance in Radiofrequency Ablation for osteoid osteoma in 86 patients.
title_short Evaluation of accuracy and precision of CT-guidance in Radiofrequency Ablation for osteoid osteoma in 86 patients.
title_sort evaluation of accuracy and precision of ct guidance in radiofrequency ablation for osteoid osteoma in 86 patients
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5383031?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT hnijland evaluationofaccuracyandprecisionofctguidanceinradiofrequencyablationforosteoidosteomain86patients
AT jggerbers evaluationofaccuracyandprecisionofctguidanceinradiofrequencyablationforosteoidosteomain86patients
AT skbulstra evaluationofaccuracyandprecisionofctguidanceinradiofrequencyablationforosteoidosteomain86patients
AT joverbosch evaluationofaccuracyandprecisionofctguidanceinradiofrequencyablationforosteoidosteomain86patients
AT mstevens evaluationofaccuracyandprecisionofctguidanceinradiofrequencyablationforosteoidosteomain86patients
AT pcjutte evaluationofaccuracyandprecisionofctguidanceinradiofrequencyablationforosteoidosteomain86patients