How to “inoculate” against multimodal misinformation: A conceptual replication of Roozenbeek and van der Linden (2020)

Abstract Building misinformation resilience at scale continues to pose a challenge. Gamified “inoculation” interventions have shown promise in improving people’s ability to recognize manipulation techniques commonly used in misinformation, but so far few interventions exist that tackle multimodal mi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julian Neylan, Mikey Biddlestone, Jon Roozenbeek, Sander van der Linden
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-10-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43885-2
_version_ 1797560196866768896
author Julian Neylan
Mikey Biddlestone
Jon Roozenbeek
Sander van der Linden
author_facet Julian Neylan
Mikey Biddlestone
Jon Roozenbeek
Sander van der Linden
author_sort Julian Neylan
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Building misinformation resilience at scale continues to pose a challenge. Gamified “inoculation” interventions have shown promise in improving people’s ability to recognize manipulation techniques commonly used in misinformation, but so far few interventions exist that tackle multimodal misinformation (e.g., videos, images). We developed a game called Cat Park, in which players learn about five manipulation techniques (trolling, emotional manipulation, amplification, polarization, and conspiracism), and how misinformation can spread through images. To test the game’s efficacy, we conducted a conceptual replication (N = 380) of Roozenbeek and van der Linden’s 2020 study about Harmony Square, with the same study design, item set, and hypotheses. Like the original study, we find that people who play Cat Park find misinformation significantly less reliable post-gameplay (d = 0.95, p < 0.001) compared to a control group, and are significantly less willing to share misinformation with people in their network (d = 0.54, p < 0.001). These effects are robust across different covariates. However, unlike the original study, Cat Park players do not become significantly more confident in their ability to identify misinformation (p = 0.204, d = − 0.13). We did not find that the game increases people’s self-reported motivation and confidence to counter misinformation online.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T17:57:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6dd89830684845eaac3acfe03a2cfd01
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T17:57:00Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-6dd89830684845eaac3acfe03a2cfd012023-11-20T09:10:34ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222023-10-0113111010.1038/s41598-023-43885-2How to “inoculate” against multimodal misinformation: A conceptual replication of Roozenbeek and van der Linden (2020)Julian Neylan0Mikey Biddlestone1Jon Roozenbeek2Sander van der Linden3TILTDepartment of Psychology, University of CambridgeDepartment of Psychology, University of CambridgeDepartment of Psychology, University of CambridgeAbstract Building misinformation resilience at scale continues to pose a challenge. Gamified “inoculation” interventions have shown promise in improving people’s ability to recognize manipulation techniques commonly used in misinformation, but so far few interventions exist that tackle multimodal misinformation (e.g., videos, images). We developed a game called Cat Park, in which players learn about five manipulation techniques (trolling, emotional manipulation, amplification, polarization, and conspiracism), and how misinformation can spread through images. To test the game’s efficacy, we conducted a conceptual replication (N = 380) of Roozenbeek and van der Linden’s 2020 study about Harmony Square, with the same study design, item set, and hypotheses. Like the original study, we find that people who play Cat Park find misinformation significantly less reliable post-gameplay (d = 0.95, p < 0.001) compared to a control group, and are significantly less willing to share misinformation with people in their network (d = 0.54, p < 0.001). These effects are robust across different covariates. However, unlike the original study, Cat Park players do not become significantly more confident in their ability to identify misinformation (p = 0.204, d = − 0.13). We did not find that the game increases people’s self-reported motivation and confidence to counter misinformation online.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43885-2
spellingShingle Julian Neylan
Mikey Biddlestone
Jon Roozenbeek
Sander van der Linden
How to “inoculate” against multimodal misinformation: A conceptual replication of Roozenbeek and van der Linden (2020)
Scientific Reports
title How to “inoculate” against multimodal misinformation: A conceptual replication of Roozenbeek and van der Linden (2020)
title_full How to “inoculate” against multimodal misinformation: A conceptual replication of Roozenbeek and van der Linden (2020)
title_fullStr How to “inoculate” against multimodal misinformation: A conceptual replication of Roozenbeek and van der Linden (2020)
title_full_unstemmed How to “inoculate” against multimodal misinformation: A conceptual replication of Roozenbeek and van der Linden (2020)
title_short How to “inoculate” against multimodal misinformation: A conceptual replication of Roozenbeek and van der Linden (2020)
title_sort how to inoculate against multimodal misinformation a conceptual replication of roozenbeek and van der linden 2020
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43885-2
work_keys_str_mv AT julianneylan howtoinoculateagainstmultimodalmisinformationaconceptualreplicationofroozenbeekandvanderlinden2020
AT mikeybiddlestone howtoinoculateagainstmultimodalmisinformationaconceptualreplicationofroozenbeekandvanderlinden2020
AT jonroozenbeek howtoinoculateagainstmultimodalmisinformationaconceptualreplicationofroozenbeekandvanderlinden2020
AT sandervanderlinden howtoinoculateagainstmultimodalmisinformationaconceptualreplicationofroozenbeekandvanderlinden2020