Defining relevant conservation targets for the endangered Southern California distinct population segment of the mountain yellow‐legged frog (Rana muscosa)
Abstract The endangered mountain yellow‐legged frog (Rana muscosa) has been reduced to <10 isolated populations in the wild. Due to frequent catastrophic events (floods, droughts, wildfires), the recent dynamics of these populations have been erratic, making the future of the species highly uncer...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2022-05-01
|
| Series: | Conservation Science and Practice |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12666 |
| _version_ | 1811248498830475264 |
|---|---|
| author | Thierry Chambert Adam R. Backlin Elizabeth Gallegos Bradd Baskerville‐Bridges Robert N. Fisher |
| author_facet | Thierry Chambert Adam R. Backlin Elizabeth Gallegos Bradd Baskerville‐Bridges Robert N. Fisher |
| author_sort | Thierry Chambert |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract The endangered mountain yellow‐legged frog (Rana muscosa) has been reduced to <10 isolated populations in the wild. Due to frequent catastrophic events (floods, droughts, wildfires), the recent dynamics of these populations have been erratic, making the future of the species highly uncertain. In 2018, a recovery plan was developed to improve the species status by reducing the impacts of various threats (predation, disease, habitat destruction), as well as reinforcing wild populations through the reintroduction of captive‐bred frogs. The short‐term goal stated in this plan was to reach a minimum of 20 populations of 50 adults each (hereafter, the 20/50 target), before the species can be considered for downlisting from the U.S. Endangered Species Act. However, there is no guarantee that this 20/50 target will be sufficient to ensure the species persistence in the long run. Using 19 years of mark‐recapture data, we estimated populations' demographic trends and assessed the viability of R. muscosa from a starting state of 20 populations of 50 adults each (i.e., the downlisting criteria). Our results reveal that, from this 20/50 state, the species has high chances of persistence only at a short time horizon (50 years). Moreover, >80% of populations would be extinct 50 years later. Therefore, the species will not be able to persist without implementation of the reintroduction program. We found that it is more important to increase the number of suitable sites occupied by R. muscosa than to simply reinforce or augment existing populations. Expanding the current distribution by establishing new populations at suitable sites, even after the “20 populations” mark has been reached, would increase the likelihood of the species' persistence in the longer term. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T15:29:12Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-6df33af1e66248e7a2bc75de6087bb67 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2578-4854 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T15:29:12Z |
| publishDate | 2022-05-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Conservation Science and Practice |
| spelling | doaj.art-6df33af1e66248e7a2bc75de6087bb672022-12-22T03:27:11ZengWileyConservation Science and Practice2578-48542022-05-0145n/an/a10.1111/csp2.12666Defining relevant conservation targets for the endangered Southern California distinct population segment of the mountain yellow‐legged frog (Rana muscosa)Thierry Chambert0Adam R. Backlin1Elizabeth Gallegos2Bradd Baskerville‐Bridges3Robert N. Fisher4Calao Wildlife Consulting Montpellier FranceU.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, San Diego Field Station San Diego California USAU.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, San Diego Field Station San Diego California USAU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Carlsbad Field Office Carlsbad California USAU.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, San Diego Field Station San Diego California USAAbstract The endangered mountain yellow‐legged frog (Rana muscosa) has been reduced to <10 isolated populations in the wild. Due to frequent catastrophic events (floods, droughts, wildfires), the recent dynamics of these populations have been erratic, making the future of the species highly uncertain. In 2018, a recovery plan was developed to improve the species status by reducing the impacts of various threats (predation, disease, habitat destruction), as well as reinforcing wild populations through the reintroduction of captive‐bred frogs. The short‐term goal stated in this plan was to reach a minimum of 20 populations of 50 adults each (hereafter, the 20/50 target), before the species can be considered for downlisting from the U.S. Endangered Species Act. However, there is no guarantee that this 20/50 target will be sufficient to ensure the species persistence in the long run. Using 19 years of mark‐recapture data, we estimated populations' demographic trends and assessed the viability of R. muscosa from a starting state of 20 populations of 50 adults each (i.e., the downlisting criteria). Our results reveal that, from this 20/50 state, the species has high chances of persistence only at a short time horizon (50 years). Moreover, >80% of populations would be extinct 50 years later. Therefore, the species will not be able to persist without implementation of the reintroduction program. We found that it is more important to increase the number of suitable sites occupied by R. muscosa than to simply reinforce or augment existing populations. Expanding the current distribution by establishing new populations at suitable sites, even after the “20 populations” mark has been reached, would increase the likelihood of the species' persistence in the longer term.https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12666amphibian declineCaliforniaconservation targetdata‐driven conservationendangered species actenvironmental stochasticity |
| spellingShingle | Thierry Chambert Adam R. Backlin Elizabeth Gallegos Bradd Baskerville‐Bridges Robert N. Fisher Defining relevant conservation targets for the endangered Southern California distinct population segment of the mountain yellow‐legged frog (Rana muscosa) Conservation Science and Practice amphibian decline California conservation target data‐driven conservation endangered species act environmental stochasticity |
| title | Defining relevant conservation targets for the endangered Southern California distinct population segment of the mountain yellow‐legged frog (Rana muscosa) |
| title_full | Defining relevant conservation targets for the endangered Southern California distinct population segment of the mountain yellow‐legged frog (Rana muscosa) |
| title_fullStr | Defining relevant conservation targets for the endangered Southern California distinct population segment of the mountain yellow‐legged frog (Rana muscosa) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Defining relevant conservation targets for the endangered Southern California distinct population segment of the mountain yellow‐legged frog (Rana muscosa) |
| title_short | Defining relevant conservation targets for the endangered Southern California distinct population segment of the mountain yellow‐legged frog (Rana muscosa) |
| title_sort | defining relevant conservation targets for the endangered southern california distinct population segment of the mountain yellow legged frog rana muscosa |
| topic | amphibian decline California conservation target data‐driven conservation endangered species act environmental stochasticity |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12666 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT thierrychambert definingrelevantconservationtargetsfortheendangeredsoutherncaliforniadistinctpopulationsegmentofthemountainyellowleggedfrogranamuscosa AT adamrbacklin definingrelevantconservationtargetsfortheendangeredsoutherncaliforniadistinctpopulationsegmentofthemountainyellowleggedfrogranamuscosa AT elizabethgallegos definingrelevantconservationtargetsfortheendangeredsoutherncaliforniadistinctpopulationsegmentofthemountainyellowleggedfrogranamuscosa AT braddbaskervillebridges definingrelevantconservationtargetsfortheendangeredsoutherncaliforniadistinctpopulationsegmentofthemountainyellowleggedfrogranamuscosa AT robertnfisher definingrelevantconservationtargetsfortheendangeredsoutherncaliforniadistinctpopulationsegmentofthemountainyellowleggedfrogranamuscosa |