WILL (When to Induce Labour to Limit risk in pregnancy hypertension): a multicentre randomised controlled trial — adaptations to deliver a timing-of-birth trial during the COVID-19 international pandemic

Abstract Background As a pragmatic randomised timing-of-birth trial, WILL adapted its trial procedures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. These are reviewed here to inform post-pandemic trial methodology. Methods The trial (internal pilot) paused in March 2020, re-opened in July 2020, and is curr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura A. Magee, Sue Tohill, Katie Kirkham, Ruth Evans, Eleni Gkini, Catherine A. Moakes, Clive Stubbs, Jim Thornton, Peter von Dadelszen, the WILL Trial Study Group
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-10-01
Series:Trials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06834-4
_version_ 1828140513590509568
author Laura A. Magee
Sue Tohill
Katie Kirkham
Ruth Evans
Eleni Gkini
Catherine A. Moakes
Clive Stubbs
Jim Thornton
Peter von Dadelszen
the WILL Trial Study Group
author_facet Laura A. Magee
Sue Tohill
Katie Kirkham
Ruth Evans
Eleni Gkini
Catherine A. Moakes
Clive Stubbs
Jim Thornton
Peter von Dadelszen
the WILL Trial Study Group
author_sort Laura A. Magee
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background As a pragmatic randomised timing-of-birth trial, WILL adapted its trial procedures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. These are reviewed here to inform post-pandemic trial methodology. Methods The trial (internal pilot) paused in March 2020, re-opened in July 2020, and is currently recruiting in 37 UK NHS consultant-led maternity units. We evaluated pandemic adaptations made to WILL processes and surveyed sites for their views of these changes (20 sites, videoconference). Results Despite 88% of sites favouring an electronic investigator site file (ISF), information technology requirements and clinical trial unit (CTU) operating procedures mandated the ongoing use of paper ISFs; site start-up delays resulted from restricted access to the CTU. Site initiation visits (SIVs) were conducted remotely; 50% of sites preferred remote SIVs and 44% felt that it was trial-dependent, while few preferred SIVs in-person as standard procedure. The Central team felt remote SIVs provided scheduling and attendance flexibility (for sites and trial staff), the option of recording discussions for missing or future staff, improved efficiency by having multiple sites attend, and time and cost savings; the negative impact on rapport-building and interaction was partially mitigated over time with more familiarity with technology and new ways-of-working. Two methods of remote consent were developed and used by 30/37 sites and for 54/156 recruits. Most (86%) sites using remote consenting felt it improved recruitment. For remote data monitoring (5 sites), advantages were primarily for the monitor (e.g. flexibility, no time constraints, reduced cost), and disadvantages primarily for the sites (e.g. document and access preparation, attendance at a follow-up meeting), but 81% of sites desired having the option of remote monitoring post-pandemic. Conclusions COVID adaptations to WILL trial processes improved the flexibility of trial delivery, for Central and site staff, and participants. Flexibility to use these strategies should be retained post-pandemic. Trial registration ISRCTN77258279. Registered on 05 December 2018.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T19:10:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6df487c7c0b045ee84f7efaddb43d2bc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1745-6215
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T19:10:45Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Trials
spelling doaj.art-6df487c7c0b045ee84f7efaddb43d2bc2022-12-22T04:07:38ZengBMCTrials1745-62152022-10-0123111010.1186/s13063-022-06834-4WILL (When to Induce Labour to Limit risk in pregnancy hypertension): a multicentre randomised controlled trial — adaptations to deliver a timing-of-birth trial during the COVID-19 international pandemicLaura A. Magee0Sue Tohill1Katie Kirkham2Ruth Evans3Eleni Gkini4Catherine A. Moakes5Clive Stubbs6Jim Thornton7Peter von Dadelszen8the WILL Trial Study GroupInstitute of Women and Children’s Health, King’s College LondonMaternity Services, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation TrustBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of BirminghamBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of BirminghamBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of BirminghamBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of BirminghamBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of BirminghamDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of NottinghamInstitute of Women and Children’s Health, King’s College LondonAbstract Background As a pragmatic randomised timing-of-birth trial, WILL adapted its trial procedures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. These are reviewed here to inform post-pandemic trial methodology. Methods The trial (internal pilot) paused in March 2020, re-opened in July 2020, and is currently recruiting in 37 UK NHS consultant-led maternity units. We evaluated pandemic adaptations made to WILL processes and surveyed sites for their views of these changes (20 sites, videoconference). Results Despite 88% of sites favouring an electronic investigator site file (ISF), information technology requirements and clinical trial unit (CTU) operating procedures mandated the ongoing use of paper ISFs; site start-up delays resulted from restricted access to the CTU. Site initiation visits (SIVs) were conducted remotely; 50% of sites preferred remote SIVs and 44% felt that it was trial-dependent, while few preferred SIVs in-person as standard procedure. The Central team felt remote SIVs provided scheduling and attendance flexibility (for sites and trial staff), the option of recording discussions for missing or future staff, improved efficiency by having multiple sites attend, and time and cost savings; the negative impact on rapport-building and interaction was partially mitigated over time with more familiarity with technology and new ways-of-working. Two methods of remote consent were developed and used by 30/37 sites and for 54/156 recruits. Most (86%) sites using remote consenting felt it improved recruitment. For remote data monitoring (5 sites), advantages were primarily for the monitor (e.g. flexibility, no time constraints, reduced cost), and disadvantages primarily for the sites (e.g. document and access preparation, attendance at a follow-up meeting), but 81% of sites desired having the option of remote monitoring post-pandemic. Conclusions COVID adaptations to WILL trial processes improved the flexibility of trial delivery, for Central and site staff, and participants. Flexibility to use these strategies should be retained post-pandemic. Trial registration ISRCTN77258279. Registered on 05 December 2018.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06834-4Trial managementRemote consentCOVIDPregnancyTiming of birth
spellingShingle Laura A. Magee
Sue Tohill
Katie Kirkham
Ruth Evans
Eleni Gkini
Catherine A. Moakes
Clive Stubbs
Jim Thornton
Peter von Dadelszen
the WILL Trial Study Group
WILL (When to Induce Labour to Limit risk in pregnancy hypertension): a multicentre randomised controlled trial — adaptations to deliver a timing-of-birth trial during the COVID-19 international pandemic
Trials
Trial management
Remote consent
COVID
Pregnancy
Timing of birth
title WILL (When to Induce Labour to Limit risk in pregnancy hypertension): a multicentre randomised controlled trial — adaptations to deliver a timing-of-birth trial during the COVID-19 international pandemic
title_full WILL (When to Induce Labour to Limit risk in pregnancy hypertension): a multicentre randomised controlled trial — adaptations to deliver a timing-of-birth trial during the COVID-19 international pandemic
title_fullStr WILL (When to Induce Labour to Limit risk in pregnancy hypertension): a multicentre randomised controlled trial — adaptations to deliver a timing-of-birth trial during the COVID-19 international pandemic
title_full_unstemmed WILL (When to Induce Labour to Limit risk in pregnancy hypertension): a multicentre randomised controlled trial — adaptations to deliver a timing-of-birth trial during the COVID-19 international pandemic
title_short WILL (When to Induce Labour to Limit risk in pregnancy hypertension): a multicentre randomised controlled trial — adaptations to deliver a timing-of-birth trial during the COVID-19 international pandemic
title_sort will when to induce labour to limit risk in pregnancy hypertension a multicentre randomised controlled trial adaptations to deliver a timing of birth trial during the covid 19 international pandemic
topic Trial management
Remote consent
COVID
Pregnancy
Timing of birth
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06834-4
work_keys_str_mv AT lauraamagee willwhentoinducelabourtolimitriskinpregnancyhypertensionamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialadaptationstodeliveratimingofbirthtrialduringthecovid19internationalpandemic
AT suetohill willwhentoinducelabourtolimitriskinpregnancyhypertensionamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialadaptationstodeliveratimingofbirthtrialduringthecovid19internationalpandemic
AT katiekirkham willwhentoinducelabourtolimitriskinpregnancyhypertensionamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialadaptationstodeliveratimingofbirthtrialduringthecovid19internationalpandemic
AT ruthevans willwhentoinducelabourtolimitriskinpregnancyhypertensionamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialadaptationstodeliveratimingofbirthtrialduringthecovid19internationalpandemic
AT elenigkini willwhentoinducelabourtolimitriskinpregnancyhypertensionamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialadaptationstodeliveratimingofbirthtrialduringthecovid19internationalpandemic
AT catherineamoakes willwhentoinducelabourtolimitriskinpregnancyhypertensionamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialadaptationstodeliveratimingofbirthtrialduringthecovid19internationalpandemic
AT clivestubbs willwhentoinducelabourtolimitriskinpregnancyhypertensionamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialadaptationstodeliveratimingofbirthtrialduringthecovid19internationalpandemic
AT jimthornton willwhentoinducelabourtolimitriskinpregnancyhypertensionamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialadaptationstodeliveratimingofbirthtrialduringthecovid19internationalpandemic
AT petervondadelszen willwhentoinducelabourtolimitriskinpregnancyhypertensionamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialadaptationstodeliveratimingofbirthtrialduringthecovid19internationalpandemic
AT thewilltrialstudygroup willwhentoinducelabourtolimitriskinpregnancyhypertensionamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialadaptationstodeliveratimingofbirthtrialduringthecovid19internationalpandemic