Observações aos prolegômenos da teoria kantiana dos juízos jurídicos a priori em Rechtslehre
In this article the kantian Rechtslehre is interpreted as a critical juridical doctrine, understandable under the critical project – started in Kritik der reinen Vernunft and adapted to the practical field in Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. In particular, it is aimed to highlight, besides the aprio...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
2010-12-01
|
Series: | Princípios |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.principios.cchla.ufrn.br/28P-99-128.pdf |
_version_ | 1811234515865042944 |
---|---|
author | Fábio César Scherer |
author_facet | Fábio César Scherer |
author_sort | Fábio César Scherer |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In this article the kantian Rechtslehre is interpreted as a critical juridical doctrine, understandable under the critical project – started in Kritik der reinen Vernunft and adapted to the practical field in Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. In particular, it is aimed to highlight, besides the apriority, the systematic character and the search for the completeness of the juridical principles, the use of the solubility of problems theory of the reasoning in general in the prolegomenon of Rechtslehre. The study of this preliminary part is justified in presenting the supreme division of the system according to principals, where it is derived a division of the law doctrine, which determines the object (Gegenstand) and, therefore, the field of this particular science and the discussion of the research procedure. Such a priori frame of the Law doctrine is the basis of the following Kantian theory of private law and public law. In a bigger picture, this article can be understood as a renouncement to the idea that the Kantian Rechtslehre does not follow the requirements of the critical philosophy – created by Hermann Cohen (Ethik des reinen Willens, 1904) and detailed by Christian Ritter (Der Rechtsgedanke Kants nach den frühen Quellen, 1971). |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T11:38:37Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-6dfe6b9740e04b61963221ed8619f652 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0104-8694 1983-2109 |
language | deu |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T11:38:37Z |
publishDate | 2010-12-01 |
publisher | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte |
record_format | Article |
series | Princípios |
spelling | doaj.art-6dfe6b9740e04b61963221ed8619f6522022-12-22T03:34:46ZdeuUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do NortePrincípios0104-86941983-21092010-12-01172899128Observações aos prolegômenos da teoria kantiana dos juízos jurídicos a priori em RechtslehreFábio César SchererIn this article the kantian Rechtslehre is interpreted as a critical juridical doctrine, understandable under the critical project – started in Kritik der reinen Vernunft and adapted to the practical field in Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. In particular, it is aimed to highlight, besides the apriority, the systematic character and the search for the completeness of the juridical principles, the use of the solubility of problems theory of the reasoning in general in the prolegomenon of Rechtslehre. The study of this preliminary part is justified in presenting the supreme division of the system according to principals, where it is derived a division of the law doctrine, which determines the object (Gegenstand) and, therefore, the field of this particular science and the discussion of the research procedure. Such a priori frame of the Law doctrine is the basis of the following Kantian theory of private law and public law. In a bigger picture, this article can be understood as a renouncement to the idea that the Kantian Rechtslehre does not follow the requirements of the critical philosophy – created by Hermann Cohen (Ethik des reinen Willens, 1904) and detailed by Christian Ritter (Der Rechtsgedanke Kants nach den frühen Quellen, 1971).http://www.principios.cchla.ufrn.br/28P-99-128.pdfAnalysis and synthesis methodExternal coercionLawLegitimate actionTranscendental philosophy |
spellingShingle | Fábio César Scherer Observações aos prolegômenos da teoria kantiana dos juízos jurídicos a priori em Rechtslehre Princípios Analysis and synthesis method External coercion Law Legitimate action Transcendental philosophy |
title | Observações aos prolegômenos da teoria kantiana dos juízos jurídicos a priori em Rechtslehre |
title_full | Observações aos prolegômenos da teoria kantiana dos juízos jurídicos a priori em Rechtslehre |
title_fullStr | Observações aos prolegômenos da teoria kantiana dos juízos jurídicos a priori em Rechtslehre |
title_full_unstemmed | Observações aos prolegômenos da teoria kantiana dos juízos jurídicos a priori em Rechtslehre |
title_short | Observações aos prolegômenos da teoria kantiana dos juízos jurídicos a priori em Rechtslehre |
title_sort | observacoes aos prolegomenos da teoria kantiana dos juizos juridicos a priori em rechtslehre |
topic | Analysis and synthesis method External coercion Law Legitimate action Transcendental philosophy |
url | http://www.principios.cchla.ufrn.br/28P-99-128.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fabiocesarscherer observacoesaosprolegomenosdateoriakantianadosjuizosjuridicosaprioriemrechtslehre |