Heritage, second and third language learner processing of written corrective feedback: Evidence from think-alouds
This study compares the processing of three different types of written corrective feedback (WCF) by heritage language (HL), second language (L2), and third language (L3) learners who wrote and revised three short essays and received a different type of WCF for each essay (i.e., direct, coding, or un...
Main Authors: | Melissa A. Bowles, Kacie Gastañaga |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Department of English Studies Faculty of Pedagogy and Fine Arts Adam Mickiewicz University
2022-12-01
|
Series: | Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/ssllt/article/view/36608 |
Similar Items
-
The Role of Written Corrective Feedback in Developing Writing in L2
by: Gabrijela Petra Nagode, et al.
Published: (2014-05-01) -
The Effect of Comprehensive Written Corrective Feedback on EFL Learners’ Written Syntactic Complexity
by: Mohammadreza Valizadeh
Published: (2022-03-01) -
Assessing the effect of focused direct and focused indirect written corrective feedback on explicit and implicit knowledge of language learners
by: Majid Nemati, et al.
Published: (2019-05-01) -
EFL Students' Preferences for Written Corrective Feedback: Do Error Types, Language Proficiency, and Foreign Language Enjoyment Matter?
by: Tiefu Zhang, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01) -
Revisiting the Role of Indirect Written Corrective Feedback in the Light of Written Languaging
by: Mahmood Reza Moradian, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01)