Subscales correlations between MSSS-88 and PRISM scales in evaluation of spasticity for patients with multiple sclerosis

Introduction/Objective. Patient-reported outcomes have been recognized as an important way of assessing health and well-being of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of the study is to determine the correlation between different subscales of Patient-Reported Impact of Spasticity Measure (P...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Knežević Tatjana, Rodić Sindi, Foti Calogero, Nikolić-Drulović Jelena, Dujmović Irena, Konstantinović Ljubica
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Serbian Medical Society 2017-01-01
Series:Srpski Arhiv za Celokupno Lekarstvo
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0370-8179/2017/0370-81791700076K.pdf
_version_ 1819060485731909632
author Knežević Tatjana
Rodić Sindi
Foti Calogero
Nikolić-Drulović Jelena
Dujmović Irena
Konstantinović Ljubica
author_facet Knežević Tatjana
Rodić Sindi
Foti Calogero
Nikolić-Drulović Jelena
Dujmović Irena
Konstantinović Ljubica
author_sort Knežević Tatjana
collection DOAJ
description Introduction/Objective. Patient-reported outcomes have been recognized as an important way of assessing health and well-being of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of the study is to determine the correlation between different subscales of Patient-Reported Impact of Spasticity Measure (PRISM) and Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity Scale (MSSS-88) scales in the estimation of spasticity influence on different domains Methods. The study is a cross-sectional observational study. MSSS-88 and PRISM scales were analyzed in five domains (body-function domain, activity domain, participation domain, personal factors/wellbeing domain, and hypothesis). For statistical interpretation of the correlation we performed the Spearman’s ρ-test, concurrent validity, divergent validity, and the linear regression model. Results. We found a significant correlation between subscales of evaluated MSSS-88 and PRISM scales for body domains; the highest correlation was between the need for assistance/positioning (NA/P) and walking (W). Spasticity has the weakest correlation with the need for intervention (NI). The presence of pain has a negative impact and significant positive correlation between pain discomfort and NI. In the domain of body function for males, there was a non-significant correlation between muscle spasms and NI. The same applies for social functioning and social embarrassment domains, as well as for emotional health and psychological agitation for personal factors / wellbeing domain. The differences between genders of MS patients persist in different domains; muscle spasms are strong predictors for NI, and body movement is a strong predictor versus W for NA/P. Conclusion. MSSS-88 and PRISM scales can be considered reliable in measuring different domains of disability for MS patients with spasticity. Because it is shorter, quicker, and simple to use, it is concluded that the PRISM scale can successfully compete with and replace the MSSS-88 scale in certain domains.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T14:27:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6e1e297376544dc89e1d72c635fc0069
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0370-8179
2406-0895
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T14:27:45Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Serbian Medical Society
record_format Article
series Srpski Arhiv za Celokupno Lekarstvo
spelling doaj.art-6e1e297376544dc89e1d72c635fc00692022-12-21T19:00:35ZengSerbian Medical SocietySrpski Arhiv za Celokupno Lekarstvo0370-81792406-08952017-01-011459-1048148510.2298/SARH160923076K0370-81791700076KSubscales correlations between MSSS-88 and PRISM scales in evaluation of spasticity for patients with multiple sclerosisKnežević Tatjana0Rodić Sindi1Foti Calogero2Nikolić-Drulović Jelena3Dujmović Irena4Konstantinović Ljubica5University Children’s, Hospital, BelgradeClinic for Rehabilitation, BelgradeTor Vergata University, Rome, ItalyFaculty of Medicine, Belgrade + Clinic of Neurology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, SerbiaFaculty of Medicine, Belgrade + Serbia Clinic of Neurology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, SerbiaFaculty of Medicine, Belgrade + Clinic for Rehabilitation, BelgradeIntroduction/Objective. Patient-reported outcomes have been recognized as an important way of assessing health and well-being of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of the study is to determine the correlation between different subscales of Patient-Reported Impact of Spasticity Measure (PRISM) and Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity Scale (MSSS-88) scales in the estimation of spasticity influence on different domains Methods. The study is a cross-sectional observational study. MSSS-88 and PRISM scales were analyzed in five domains (body-function domain, activity domain, participation domain, personal factors/wellbeing domain, and hypothesis). For statistical interpretation of the correlation we performed the Spearman’s ρ-test, concurrent validity, divergent validity, and the linear regression model. Results. We found a significant correlation between subscales of evaluated MSSS-88 and PRISM scales for body domains; the highest correlation was between the need for assistance/positioning (NA/P) and walking (W). Spasticity has the weakest correlation with the need for intervention (NI). The presence of pain has a negative impact and significant positive correlation between pain discomfort and NI. In the domain of body function for males, there was a non-significant correlation between muscle spasms and NI. The same applies for social functioning and social embarrassment domains, as well as for emotional health and psychological agitation for personal factors / wellbeing domain. The differences between genders of MS patients persist in different domains; muscle spasms are strong predictors for NI, and body movement is a strong predictor versus W for NA/P. Conclusion. MSSS-88 and PRISM scales can be considered reliable in measuring different domains of disability for MS patients with spasticity. Because it is shorter, quicker, and simple to use, it is concluded that the PRISM scale can successfully compete with and replace the MSSS-88 scale in certain domains.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0370-8179/2017/0370-81791700076K.pdfmultiple sclerosisspasticityscalespatient orientid scales
spellingShingle Knežević Tatjana
Rodić Sindi
Foti Calogero
Nikolić-Drulović Jelena
Dujmović Irena
Konstantinović Ljubica
Subscales correlations between MSSS-88 and PRISM scales in evaluation of spasticity for patients with multiple sclerosis
Srpski Arhiv za Celokupno Lekarstvo
multiple sclerosis
spasticity
scales
patient orientid scales
title Subscales correlations between MSSS-88 and PRISM scales in evaluation of spasticity for patients with multiple sclerosis
title_full Subscales correlations between MSSS-88 and PRISM scales in evaluation of spasticity for patients with multiple sclerosis
title_fullStr Subscales correlations between MSSS-88 and PRISM scales in evaluation of spasticity for patients with multiple sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed Subscales correlations between MSSS-88 and PRISM scales in evaluation of spasticity for patients with multiple sclerosis
title_short Subscales correlations between MSSS-88 and PRISM scales in evaluation of spasticity for patients with multiple sclerosis
title_sort subscales correlations between msss 88 and prism scales in evaluation of spasticity for patients with multiple sclerosis
topic multiple sclerosis
spasticity
scales
patient orientid scales
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0370-8179/2017/0370-81791700076K.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT knezevictatjana subscalescorrelationsbetweenmsss88andprismscalesinevaluationofspasticityforpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT rodicsindi subscalescorrelationsbetweenmsss88andprismscalesinevaluationofspasticityforpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT foticalogero subscalescorrelationsbetweenmsss88andprismscalesinevaluationofspasticityforpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT nikolicdrulovicjelena subscalescorrelationsbetweenmsss88andprismscalesinevaluationofspasticityforpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT dujmovicirena subscalescorrelationsbetweenmsss88andprismscalesinevaluationofspasticityforpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT konstantinovicljubica subscalescorrelationsbetweenmsss88andprismscalesinevaluationofspasticityforpatientswithmultiplesclerosis