Antipsychotic-placebo separation on the PANSS-6 subscale as compared to the PANSS-30: a pooled participant-level analysis

Abstract In order for measurement-based care to be implemented, there is a need for brief rating instruments that can be administered in a short amount of time, but that are still sufficiently informative. Here, we assessed the drug–placebo sensitivity of the six-item subscale (PANSS-6) of the 30-it...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fredrik Hieronymus, Pernille Kølbæk, Christoph U. Correll, Søren D. Østergaard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2021-08-01
Series:npj Schizophrenia
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-021-00168-x
_version_ 1797643062180052992
author Fredrik Hieronymus
Pernille Kølbæk
Christoph U. Correll
Søren D. Østergaard
author_facet Fredrik Hieronymus
Pernille Kølbæk
Christoph U. Correll
Søren D. Østergaard
author_sort Fredrik Hieronymus
collection DOAJ
description Abstract In order for measurement-based care to be implemented, there is a need for brief rating instruments that can be administered in a short amount of time, but that are still sufficiently informative. Here, we assessed the drug–placebo sensitivity of the six-item subscale (PANSS-6) of the 30-item Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-30) using a large collection of patient-level data (n = 6685) from randomized controlled trials of risperidone and paliperidone. When analyzing the data by study, we found no material difference in mean effect sizes (ES) between the two measures (PANSS-30 ES = 0.45, PANSS-6 ES = 0.44; p = 0.642). Stratifying the pooled population according to several putative effect moderators (e.g., age, formulation, dose, or diagnosis) generally yielded no meaningful ES differences between the two measures. Similarly, early improvement (≥20% improvement at week 1) on the PANSS-6 predicted subsequent response (≥40% improvement at endpoint) as well as the analog prediction using PANSS-30. Finally, cross-sectional symptom remission assessed via the PANSS-6 showed very good agreement (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 98%) with cross-sectional symptom remission defined by the Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T14:09:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6e2551eb683541798116ff0d4547bbfa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2334-265X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T14:09:13Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series npj Schizophrenia
spelling doaj.art-6e2551eb683541798116ff0d4547bbfa2023-11-02T00:41:45ZengNature Portfolionpj Schizophrenia2334-265X2021-08-017111010.1038/s41537-021-00168-xAntipsychotic-placebo separation on the PANSS-6 subscale as compared to the PANSS-30: a pooled participant-level analysisFredrik Hieronymus0Pernille Kølbæk1Christoph U. Correll2Søren D. Østergaard3Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus UniversityDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus UniversityDivision of Psychiatry Research, The Zucker Hillside HospitalDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus UniversityAbstract In order for measurement-based care to be implemented, there is a need for brief rating instruments that can be administered in a short amount of time, but that are still sufficiently informative. Here, we assessed the drug–placebo sensitivity of the six-item subscale (PANSS-6) of the 30-item Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-30) using a large collection of patient-level data (n = 6685) from randomized controlled trials of risperidone and paliperidone. When analyzing the data by study, we found no material difference in mean effect sizes (ES) between the two measures (PANSS-30 ES = 0.45, PANSS-6 ES = 0.44; p = 0.642). Stratifying the pooled population according to several putative effect moderators (e.g., age, formulation, dose, or diagnosis) generally yielded no meaningful ES differences between the two measures. Similarly, early improvement (≥20% improvement at week 1) on the PANSS-6 predicted subsequent response (≥40% improvement at endpoint) as well as the analog prediction using PANSS-30. Finally, cross-sectional symptom remission assessed via the PANSS-6 showed very good agreement (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 98%) with cross-sectional symptom remission defined by the Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-021-00168-x
spellingShingle Fredrik Hieronymus
Pernille Kølbæk
Christoph U. Correll
Søren D. Østergaard
Antipsychotic-placebo separation on the PANSS-6 subscale as compared to the PANSS-30: a pooled participant-level analysis
npj Schizophrenia
title Antipsychotic-placebo separation on the PANSS-6 subscale as compared to the PANSS-30: a pooled participant-level analysis
title_full Antipsychotic-placebo separation on the PANSS-6 subscale as compared to the PANSS-30: a pooled participant-level analysis
title_fullStr Antipsychotic-placebo separation on the PANSS-6 subscale as compared to the PANSS-30: a pooled participant-level analysis
title_full_unstemmed Antipsychotic-placebo separation on the PANSS-6 subscale as compared to the PANSS-30: a pooled participant-level analysis
title_short Antipsychotic-placebo separation on the PANSS-6 subscale as compared to the PANSS-30: a pooled participant-level analysis
title_sort antipsychotic placebo separation on the panss 6 subscale as compared to the panss 30 a pooled participant level analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-021-00168-x
work_keys_str_mv AT fredrikhieronymus antipsychoticplaceboseparationonthepanss6subscaleascomparedtothepanss30apooledparticipantlevelanalysis
AT pernillekølbæk antipsychoticplaceboseparationonthepanss6subscaleascomparedtothepanss30apooledparticipantlevelanalysis
AT christophucorrell antipsychoticplaceboseparationonthepanss6subscaleascomparedtothepanss30apooledparticipantlevelanalysis
AT sørendøstergaard antipsychoticplaceboseparationonthepanss6subscaleascomparedtothepanss30apooledparticipantlevelanalysis