Medial turn and aesthetics of excess
The evolution of media system had an impact on human forms of communication and the relationship between human beings and reality (Schmidt,2013). In addition, the relationship between the media and human beings has undergone changes. Human beings have become an instrument of the media, rather than i...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Faculty of Political Sciences, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Hercegovina and Institute for Political Studies, Belgrade, Serbia
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Politeia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/2232-9641/2021/2232-96412122025S.pdf |
_version_ | 1811190846504042496 |
---|---|
author | Stojanović-Prelević Ivana |
author_facet | Stojanović-Prelević Ivana |
author_sort | Stojanović-Prelević Ivana |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The evolution of media system had an impact on human forms of communication and the relationship between human beings and reality (Schmidt,2013). In addition, the relationship between the media and human beings has undergone changes. Human beings have become an instrument of the media, rather than its goal, which is opposite to deontological ethics based on the respect of human dignity. After transition from communicativeness to mediality, one can talk about the mediatization of mind, which consists of the development of new tools: computers (Hudzik, 2018) and technocentrism (Krämer, 1989). The medial turn means that the form is more important than the content, which is reflected in the media aesthetics, also called (after the media turn occurred) the aesthetics of excess. (Lipovecki, Seroa 2013). The author explains the medial turn phenomenon and explores the nature of the corresponding media aesthetics. A descriptive method is used. Given that visual culture is widespread, due to the development of technologies and possibilities of manipulating and using different effects, the focus of media contents is more on the image, which goes in favor of the hypothesis that contemporary society is the society of images, not of the text (Mirzoef, 1983). This is also the main hypothesis in the paper, which is confirmed in the conclusion. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T14:56:10Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-6e3623096a544672b37fa8a93d8aaf51 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2232-9641 2566-2805 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T14:56:10Z |
publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
publisher | Faculty of Political Sciences, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Hercegovina and Institute for Political Studies, Belgrade, Serbia |
record_format | Article |
series | Politeia |
spelling | doaj.art-6e3623096a544672b37fa8a93d8aaf512022-12-22T04:17:14ZengFaculty of Political Sciences, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Hercegovina and Institute for Political Studies, Belgrade, SerbiaPoliteia2232-96412566-28052021-01-011122253510.5937/politeia0-348172232-96412122025SMedial turn and aesthetics of excessStojanović-Prelević Ivana0Univerzitet u Nišu, Filozofski fakultet, Niš, SerbiaThe evolution of media system had an impact on human forms of communication and the relationship between human beings and reality (Schmidt,2013). In addition, the relationship between the media and human beings has undergone changes. Human beings have become an instrument of the media, rather than its goal, which is opposite to deontological ethics based on the respect of human dignity. After transition from communicativeness to mediality, one can talk about the mediatization of mind, which consists of the development of new tools: computers (Hudzik, 2018) and technocentrism (Krämer, 1989). The medial turn means that the form is more important than the content, which is reflected in the media aesthetics, also called (after the media turn occurred) the aesthetics of excess. (Lipovecki, Seroa 2013). The author explains the medial turn phenomenon and explores the nature of the corresponding media aesthetics. A descriptive method is used. Given that visual culture is widespread, due to the development of technologies and possibilities of manipulating and using different effects, the focus of media contents is more on the image, which goes in favor of the hypothesis that contemporary society is the society of images, not of the text (Mirzoef, 1983). This is also the main hypothesis in the paper, which is confirmed in the conclusion.https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/2232-9641/2021/2232-96412122025S.pdfmediaaestheticsmedial turnaesthetics of excess |
spellingShingle | Stojanović-Prelević Ivana Medial turn and aesthetics of excess Politeia media aesthetics medial turn aesthetics of excess |
title | Medial turn and aesthetics of excess |
title_full | Medial turn and aesthetics of excess |
title_fullStr | Medial turn and aesthetics of excess |
title_full_unstemmed | Medial turn and aesthetics of excess |
title_short | Medial turn and aesthetics of excess |
title_sort | medial turn and aesthetics of excess |
topic | media aesthetics medial turn aesthetics of excess |
url | https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/2232-9641/2021/2232-96412122025S.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stojanovicprelevicivana medialturnandaestheticsofexcess |