Direct and indirect comparisons in network meta-analysis of SuperPATH, direct anterior and posterior approaches in total hip arthroplasty
Abstract SuperPATH is a novel approach to the hip joint that needs to be compared to other known surgical approaches. To conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing short-term outcomes of SuperPATH, direct anterior (DAA), and posterior/ posterolateral appro...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2022-10-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20242-3 |
_version_ | 1811194914179907584 |
---|---|
author | Nikolai Ramadanov Simon Bueschges Kuiliang Liu Philip Lazaru Ivan Marintschev |
author_facet | Nikolai Ramadanov Simon Bueschges Kuiliang Liu Philip Lazaru Ivan Marintschev |
author_sort | Nikolai Ramadanov |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract SuperPATH is a novel approach to the hip joint that needs to be compared to other known surgical approaches. To conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing short-term outcomes of SuperPATH, direct anterior (DAA), and posterior/ posterolateral approaches (PA) in total hip joint arthroplasty (THA). We performed a systematic review on PubMed, CNKI, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Clinical trials, and Google Scholar up to November 30th, 2021. We assessed treatment effects between SuperPATH, DAA, and PA by performing a frequentist NMA, including a total of 20 RCTs involving 1501 patients. SuperPATH showed a longer operation time (MD = 16.99, 95% CI 4.92 to 29.07), a shorter incision length (MD = −4.71, 95% CI −6.21 to −3.22), a lower intraoperative blood loss (MD = −81.75, 95% CI −114.78 to −48.72), a higher HHS 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively (MD = 2.59, 95% CI 0.59–4.6; MD = 2.14, 95% CI 0.5–3.77; MD = 0.6, 95% CI 0.03–1.17, respectively) than PA. DAA showed a higher intraoperative blood loss than PA and SuperPATH (MD = 91.87, 95% CI 27.99–155.74; MD = 173.62, 95% CI 101.71–245.53, respectively). No other relevant differences were found. In conclusion, the overall findings suggested that the short-term outcomes of THA through SuperPATH were statistically superior to PA. DAA and PA as well as SuperPATH and DAA showed indifferent results. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T00:35:15Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-6e451fd140d34df7bb593c47601059f5 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2045-2322 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T00:35:15Z |
publishDate | 2022-10-01 |
publisher | Nature Portfolio |
record_format | Article |
series | Scientific Reports |
spelling | doaj.art-6e451fd140d34df7bb593c47601059f52022-12-22T03:55:11ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222022-10-0112111610.1038/s41598-022-20242-3Direct and indirect comparisons in network meta-analysis of SuperPATH, direct anterior and posterior approaches in total hip arthroplastyNikolai Ramadanov0Simon Bueschges1Kuiliang Liu2Philip Lazaru3Ivan Marintschev4Center of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor FontaneFaculty of Medicine, Department of Statistics, University of SalamancaDepartment for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Siloah St. Trudpert HospitalCenter for Surgery, Evangelical Hospital Ludwigsfelde-TeltowDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich Schiller UniversityAbstract SuperPATH is a novel approach to the hip joint that needs to be compared to other known surgical approaches. To conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing short-term outcomes of SuperPATH, direct anterior (DAA), and posterior/ posterolateral approaches (PA) in total hip joint arthroplasty (THA). We performed a systematic review on PubMed, CNKI, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Clinical trials, and Google Scholar up to November 30th, 2021. We assessed treatment effects between SuperPATH, DAA, and PA by performing a frequentist NMA, including a total of 20 RCTs involving 1501 patients. SuperPATH showed a longer operation time (MD = 16.99, 95% CI 4.92 to 29.07), a shorter incision length (MD = −4.71, 95% CI −6.21 to −3.22), a lower intraoperative blood loss (MD = −81.75, 95% CI −114.78 to −48.72), a higher HHS 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively (MD = 2.59, 95% CI 0.59–4.6; MD = 2.14, 95% CI 0.5–3.77; MD = 0.6, 95% CI 0.03–1.17, respectively) than PA. DAA showed a higher intraoperative blood loss than PA and SuperPATH (MD = 91.87, 95% CI 27.99–155.74; MD = 173.62, 95% CI 101.71–245.53, respectively). No other relevant differences were found. In conclusion, the overall findings suggested that the short-term outcomes of THA through SuperPATH were statistically superior to PA. DAA and PA as well as SuperPATH and DAA showed indifferent results.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20242-3 |
spellingShingle | Nikolai Ramadanov Simon Bueschges Kuiliang Liu Philip Lazaru Ivan Marintschev Direct and indirect comparisons in network meta-analysis of SuperPATH, direct anterior and posterior approaches in total hip arthroplasty Scientific Reports |
title | Direct and indirect comparisons in network meta-analysis of SuperPATH, direct anterior and posterior approaches in total hip arthroplasty |
title_full | Direct and indirect comparisons in network meta-analysis of SuperPATH, direct anterior and posterior approaches in total hip arthroplasty |
title_fullStr | Direct and indirect comparisons in network meta-analysis of SuperPATH, direct anterior and posterior approaches in total hip arthroplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | Direct and indirect comparisons in network meta-analysis of SuperPATH, direct anterior and posterior approaches in total hip arthroplasty |
title_short | Direct and indirect comparisons in network meta-analysis of SuperPATH, direct anterior and posterior approaches in total hip arthroplasty |
title_sort | direct and indirect comparisons in network meta analysis of superpath direct anterior and posterior approaches in total hip arthroplasty |
url | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20242-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nikolairamadanov directandindirectcomparisonsinnetworkmetaanalysisofsuperpathdirectanteriorandposteriorapproachesintotalhiparthroplasty AT simonbueschges directandindirectcomparisonsinnetworkmetaanalysisofsuperpathdirectanteriorandposteriorapproachesintotalhiparthroplasty AT kuiliangliu directandindirectcomparisonsinnetworkmetaanalysisofsuperpathdirectanteriorandposteriorapproachesintotalhiparthroplasty AT philiplazaru directandindirectcomparisonsinnetworkmetaanalysisofsuperpathdirectanteriorandposteriorapproachesintotalhiparthroplasty AT ivanmarintschev directandindirectcomparisonsinnetworkmetaanalysisofsuperpathdirectanteriorandposteriorapproachesintotalhiparthroplasty |