Costs and Benefits to Pregnant Male Pipefish Caring for Broods of Different Sizes.

Trade-offs between brood size and offspring size, offspring survival, parental condition or parental survival are classic assumptions in life history biology. A reduction in brood size may lessen these costs of care, but offspring mortality can also result in an energetic gain, if parents are able t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gry Sagebakken, Ingrid Ahnesjö, Charlotta Kvarnemo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4886961?pdf=render
_version_ 1811270000762159104
author Gry Sagebakken
Ingrid Ahnesjö
Charlotta Kvarnemo
author_facet Gry Sagebakken
Ingrid Ahnesjö
Charlotta Kvarnemo
author_sort Gry Sagebakken
collection DOAJ
description Trade-offs between brood size and offspring size, offspring survival, parental condition or parental survival are classic assumptions in life history biology. A reduction in brood size may lessen these costs of care, but offspring mortality can also result in an energetic gain, if parents are able to utilize the nutrients from the demised young. Males of the broad-nosed pipefish (Syngnathus typhle) care for the offspring by brooding embryos in a brood pouch. Brooding males can absorb nutrients that emanate from embryos, and there is often a reduction in offspring number over the brooding period. In this study, using two experimentally determined brood sizes (partially and fully filled brood pouches), we found that full broods resulted in larger number of developing offspring, despite significantly higher absolute and relative embryo mortality, compared to partial broods. Male survival was also affected by brood size, with males caring for full broods having poorer survival, an effect that together with the reduced embryo survival was found to negate the benefit of large broods. We found that embryo mortality was lower when the brooding males were in good initial condition, that embryos in broods with low embryo mortality weighed more, and surprisingly, that males in higher initial condition had embryos of lower weight. Brood size, however, did not affect embryo weight. Male final condition, but not initial condition, correlated with higher male survival. Taken together, our results show costs and benefits of caring for large brood sizes, where the numerical benefits come with costs in terms of both embryo survival and survival of the brooding father, effects that are often mediated via male condition.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T21:52:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6e4d01eab7164669bbc699660445a610
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T21:52:59Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-6e4d01eab7164669bbc699660445a6102022-12-22T03:15:24ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01115e015648410.1371/journal.pone.0156484Costs and Benefits to Pregnant Male Pipefish Caring for Broods of Different Sizes.Gry SagebakkenIngrid AhnesjöCharlotta KvarnemoTrade-offs between brood size and offspring size, offspring survival, parental condition or parental survival are classic assumptions in life history biology. A reduction in brood size may lessen these costs of care, but offspring mortality can also result in an energetic gain, if parents are able to utilize the nutrients from the demised young. Males of the broad-nosed pipefish (Syngnathus typhle) care for the offspring by brooding embryos in a brood pouch. Brooding males can absorb nutrients that emanate from embryos, and there is often a reduction in offspring number over the brooding period. In this study, using two experimentally determined brood sizes (partially and fully filled brood pouches), we found that full broods resulted in larger number of developing offspring, despite significantly higher absolute and relative embryo mortality, compared to partial broods. Male survival was also affected by brood size, with males caring for full broods having poorer survival, an effect that together with the reduced embryo survival was found to negate the benefit of large broods. We found that embryo mortality was lower when the brooding males were in good initial condition, that embryos in broods with low embryo mortality weighed more, and surprisingly, that males in higher initial condition had embryos of lower weight. Brood size, however, did not affect embryo weight. Male final condition, but not initial condition, correlated with higher male survival. Taken together, our results show costs and benefits of caring for large brood sizes, where the numerical benefits come with costs in terms of both embryo survival and survival of the brooding father, effects that are often mediated via male condition.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4886961?pdf=render
spellingShingle Gry Sagebakken
Ingrid Ahnesjö
Charlotta Kvarnemo
Costs and Benefits to Pregnant Male Pipefish Caring for Broods of Different Sizes.
PLoS ONE
title Costs and Benefits to Pregnant Male Pipefish Caring for Broods of Different Sizes.
title_full Costs and Benefits to Pregnant Male Pipefish Caring for Broods of Different Sizes.
title_fullStr Costs and Benefits to Pregnant Male Pipefish Caring for Broods of Different Sizes.
title_full_unstemmed Costs and Benefits to Pregnant Male Pipefish Caring for Broods of Different Sizes.
title_short Costs and Benefits to Pregnant Male Pipefish Caring for Broods of Different Sizes.
title_sort costs and benefits to pregnant male pipefish caring for broods of different sizes
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4886961?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT grysagebakken costsandbenefitstopregnantmalepipefishcaringforbroodsofdifferentsizes
AT ingridahnesjo costsandbenefitstopregnantmalepipefishcaringforbroodsofdifferentsizes
AT charlottakvarnemo costsandbenefitstopregnantmalepipefishcaringforbroodsofdifferentsizes