A research analysis of the difference of opinion among the jurists and mystics about the disputed matters in the light if Tafseer Room am Ma'ani

A scholarly review of dissentious tenets between jurisprudents and Sufis in the light of “Ruhol Maani”.Mahmood bin Abdullah Aloosi is a well-known scholar of the Islamic world. his nickname is Shehab u din. he wrote more than twenty-two books on different topics. one of his famous books is Ruhol maa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wali Zaman, Fakhar ud Din
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: Hazara University 2021-01-01
Series:Hazara Islamicus
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hazaraislamicus.com/index.php/home/article/view/8
_version_ 1830193052389474304
author Wali Zaman
Fakhar ud Din
author_facet Wali Zaman
Fakhar ud Din
author_sort Wali Zaman
collection DOAJ
description A scholarly review of dissentious tenets between jurisprudents and Sufis in the light of “Ruhol Maani”.Mahmood bin Abdullah Aloosi is a well-known scholar of the Islamic world. his nickname is Shehab u din. he wrote more than twenty-two books on different topics. one of his famous books is Ruhol maani in Tafseer. in Tafseer he described various issues of Islamic education, such as serf. nahv, balaghat etc. he also described the dissentious tenets between jurisprudents and Sufis. in this article we have mentioned some of such tenets. • Infoldment of distance: infoldment of distance means covering lengthy travel or voyage in short term. according to Sufis infolding of distance is approved for saints while jurisprudents refusing it • rational soul in beasts: Sufis are also confuted of rational souls in beasts while jurisprudents are not agreed with them in this tenet. • Appetites: according to Sufis the appetites is of three kinds: 1. benevolence, 2. irascibility, 3. inordinate appetites. while jurisprudents said that the appetites are one and the above three things are epithets of it. 4. Humility for prayers/salah: humility is necessary for the admissibility of salah near the Sufis. near jurisprudents, humility is not necessary for it.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T00:06:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6e54e6a1b5da48fbab5b26548ad2f073
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2410-8065
language Arabic
last_indexed 2024-12-18T00:06:24Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Hazara University
record_format Article
series Hazara Islamicus
spelling doaj.art-6e54e6a1b5da48fbab5b26548ad2f0732022-12-21T21:27:47ZaraHazara UniversityHazara Islamicus2410-80652021-01-0190277928A research analysis of the difference of opinion among the jurists and mystics about the disputed matters in the light if Tafseer Room am Ma'aniWali Zaman0Fakhar ud Din1Ph.D Scholar, University of Science and Technology, BanuLecturer, Islamnic Studies and Research, Ph.D Scholar, University of Science and Technology, BanuA scholarly review of dissentious tenets between jurisprudents and Sufis in the light of “Ruhol Maani”.Mahmood bin Abdullah Aloosi is a well-known scholar of the Islamic world. his nickname is Shehab u din. he wrote more than twenty-two books on different topics. one of his famous books is Ruhol maani in Tafseer. in Tafseer he described various issues of Islamic education, such as serf. nahv, balaghat etc. he also described the dissentious tenets between jurisprudents and Sufis. in this article we have mentioned some of such tenets. • Infoldment of distance: infoldment of distance means covering lengthy travel or voyage in short term. according to Sufis infolding of distance is approved for saints while jurisprudents refusing it • rational soul in beasts: Sufis are also confuted of rational souls in beasts while jurisprudents are not agreed with them in this tenet. • Appetites: according to Sufis the appetites is of three kinds: 1. benevolence, 2. irascibility, 3. inordinate appetites. while jurisprudents said that the appetites are one and the above three things are epithets of it. 4. Humility for prayers/salah: humility is necessary for the admissibility of salah near the Sufis. near jurisprudents, humility is not necessary for it.https://hazaraislamicus.com/index.php/home/article/view/8ruhol maani, sufis, irascibility, . inordinate
spellingShingle Wali Zaman
Fakhar ud Din
A research analysis of the difference of opinion among the jurists and mystics about the disputed matters in the light if Tafseer Room am Ma'ani
Hazara Islamicus
ruhol maani, sufis, irascibility, . inordinate
title A research analysis of the difference of opinion among the jurists and mystics about the disputed matters in the light if Tafseer Room am Ma'ani
title_full A research analysis of the difference of opinion among the jurists and mystics about the disputed matters in the light if Tafseer Room am Ma'ani
title_fullStr A research analysis of the difference of opinion among the jurists and mystics about the disputed matters in the light if Tafseer Room am Ma'ani
title_full_unstemmed A research analysis of the difference of opinion among the jurists and mystics about the disputed matters in the light if Tafseer Room am Ma'ani
title_short A research analysis of the difference of opinion among the jurists and mystics about the disputed matters in the light if Tafseer Room am Ma'ani
title_sort research analysis of the difference of opinion among the jurists and mystics about the disputed matters in the light if tafseer room am ma ani
topic ruhol maani, sufis, irascibility, . inordinate
url https://hazaraislamicus.com/index.php/home/article/view/8
work_keys_str_mv AT walizaman aresearchanalysisofthedifferenceofopinionamongthejuristsandmysticsaboutthedisputedmattersinthelightiftafseerroomammaani
AT fakharuddin aresearchanalysisofthedifferenceofopinionamongthejuristsandmysticsaboutthedisputedmattersinthelightiftafseerroomammaani
AT walizaman researchanalysisofthedifferenceofopinionamongthejuristsandmysticsaboutthedisputedmattersinthelightiftafseerroomammaani
AT fakharuddin researchanalysisofthedifferenceofopinionamongthejuristsandmysticsaboutthedisputedmattersinthelightiftafseerroomammaani