A systematic review and meta-analysis of percutaneous coronary intervention compared to coronary artery bypass grafting in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome
Abstract Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) affects millions of patients. Although an invasive strategy can improve survival, the optimal treatment [i.e., percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)] is not clear. We performed a meta-analysis o...
Main Authors: | Hristo Kirov, Tulio Caldonazo, Mohamed Rahouma, N. Bryce Robinson, Michelle Demetres, Patrick W. Serruys, Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai, Mario Gaudino, Torsten Doenst |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2022-03-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09158-0 |
Similar Items
-
Comparing outcomes between coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians with left main or multivessel disease
by: Hristo Kirov, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01) -
Quality of Life After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
by: Arnaldo Dimagli, et al.
Published: (2023-11-01) -
Coronary artery bypass graft vs. percutaneous coronary angioplasty: CABG on the rebound?
by: Taggart, D
Published: (2007) -
Comparing CABG and PCI across the globe based on current regional registry evidence
by: Tulio Caldonazo, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
Rate of Urgent Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)
by: Seyed Amir Kassaei, et al.
Published: (2008-01-01)