Bioabsorbable magnesium screw versus conventional titanium screw fixation for medial malleolar fractures

Abstract Background It is still unknown whether bioabsorbable magnesium (Mg) screws provide an advantage over titanium screws in the treatment of medial malleolar (MM) fractures. The purpose of this retrospective study is to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of MM fractures fixed with e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hasan May, Yusuf Alper Kati, Gurkan Gumussuyu, Tuluhan Yunus Emre, Melih Unal, Ozkan Kose
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2020-05-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s10195-020-00547-7
_version_ 1818498648231641088
author Hasan May
Yusuf Alper Kati
Gurkan Gumussuyu
Tuluhan Yunus Emre
Melih Unal
Ozkan Kose
author_facet Hasan May
Yusuf Alper Kati
Gurkan Gumussuyu
Tuluhan Yunus Emre
Melih Unal
Ozkan Kose
author_sort Hasan May
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background It is still unknown whether bioabsorbable magnesium (Mg) screws provide an advantage over titanium screws in the treatment of medial malleolar (MM) fractures. The purpose of this retrospective study is to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of MM fractures fixed with either bioabsorbable Mg screws or conventional titanium screws. Materials and methods A cohort of 48 patients with MM fractures who underwent compression screw fixation was retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-three patients (16 male, 7 female; mean age: 37.9 ± 17.7 years) were treated with bioabsorbable Mg screws, and 25 patients (14 male, 11 female; mean age: 45.0 ± 15.7 years) were treated with conventional titanium screw fixation. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year, with a mean time of 24.6 ± 10.5 months (12–53 months). The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale was used to evaluate the clinical results. The Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) osteoarthritis grading was used to evaluate posttraumatic osteoarthritis on final ankle radiographs. Fracture union, rate of implant removal, and complications were recorded. Comparative analysis of two independent groups was performed using the chi-squared test and the Mann–Whitney U-test. Results The two groups were comparable concerning demographic and clinical characteristics. Age (p = 0.146), sex (p = 0.252), side (p = 0.190), MM fracture type (p = 0.500), associated fractures (p = 0.470), and follow-up period (p = 0.903) were similar between the groups. At final follow-up examination, AOFAS score (p = 0.191) was similar between groups. Fracture union was achieved in all cases. Grade of posttraumatic osteoarthritis, according to KL, was equally distributed in both groups (p = 0.074). No deep infection or osteomyelitis was seen. Five patients in the titanium screw group underwent implant removal, due to pain in three of them and difficulty in wearing shoes in the other two (p = 0.031). Implant removal was performed after a mean of 14.2 ± 3.1 months (12–19 months). Conclusions Bioabsorbable Mg and titanium screws had similar therapeutic efficacy in MM fracture fixation regarding functional and radiological outcomes. However, the rate of implant removal was higher with titanium screws. Bioabsorbable Mg screws may be a favorable fixation option since secondary implant removal procedures can be prevented. Level of evidence Level IV, Retrospective case series.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T20:18:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6e97fb7a08e04c408038471e23b9118e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1590-9921
1590-9999
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T20:18:26Z
publishDate 2020-05-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
spelling doaj.art-6e97fb7a08e04c408038471e23b9118e2022-12-22T01:35:07ZengSpringerOpenJournal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology1590-99211590-99992020-05-012111810.1186/s10195-020-00547-7Bioabsorbable magnesium screw versus conventional titanium screw fixation for medial malleolar fracturesHasan May0Yusuf Alper Kati1Gurkan Gumussuyu2Tuluhan Yunus Emre3Melih Unal4Ozkan Kose5Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Antalya Training and Research HospitalDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Antalya Training and Research HospitalDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medical Faculty, Altınbaş UniversityDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medical Faculty, Biruni UniversityDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Antalya Training and Research HospitalDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Antalya Training and Research HospitalAbstract Background It is still unknown whether bioabsorbable magnesium (Mg) screws provide an advantage over titanium screws in the treatment of medial malleolar (MM) fractures. The purpose of this retrospective study is to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of MM fractures fixed with either bioabsorbable Mg screws or conventional titanium screws. Materials and methods A cohort of 48 patients with MM fractures who underwent compression screw fixation was retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-three patients (16 male, 7 female; mean age: 37.9 ± 17.7 years) were treated with bioabsorbable Mg screws, and 25 patients (14 male, 11 female; mean age: 45.0 ± 15.7 years) were treated with conventional titanium screw fixation. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year, with a mean time of 24.6 ± 10.5 months (12–53 months). The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale was used to evaluate the clinical results. The Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) osteoarthritis grading was used to evaluate posttraumatic osteoarthritis on final ankle radiographs. Fracture union, rate of implant removal, and complications were recorded. Comparative analysis of two independent groups was performed using the chi-squared test and the Mann–Whitney U-test. Results The two groups were comparable concerning demographic and clinical characteristics. Age (p = 0.146), sex (p = 0.252), side (p = 0.190), MM fracture type (p = 0.500), associated fractures (p = 0.470), and follow-up period (p = 0.903) were similar between the groups. At final follow-up examination, AOFAS score (p = 0.191) was similar between groups. Fracture union was achieved in all cases. Grade of posttraumatic osteoarthritis, according to KL, was equally distributed in both groups (p = 0.074). No deep infection or osteomyelitis was seen. Five patients in the titanium screw group underwent implant removal, due to pain in three of them and difficulty in wearing shoes in the other two (p = 0.031). Implant removal was performed after a mean of 14.2 ± 3.1 months (12–19 months). Conclusions Bioabsorbable Mg and titanium screws had similar therapeutic efficacy in MM fracture fixation regarding functional and radiological outcomes. However, the rate of implant removal was higher with titanium screws. Bioabsorbable Mg screws may be a favorable fixation option since secondary implant removal procedures can be prevented. Level of evidence Level IV, Retrospective case series.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s10195-020-00547-7Ankle fractureMedial malleolar fractureImplant removalMagnesium screwTitanium screwBioabsorbable implant
spellingShingle Hasan May
Yusuf Alper Kati
Gurkan Gumussuyu
Tuluhan Yunus Emre
Melih Unal
Ozkan Kose
Bioabsorbable magnesium screw versus conventional titanium screw fixation for medial malleolar fractures
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Ankle fracture
Medial malleolar fracture
Implant removal
Magnesium screw
Titanium screw
Bioabsorbable implant
title Bioabsorbable magnesium screw versus conventional titanium screw fixation for medial malleolar fractures
title_full Bioabsorbable magnesium screw versus conventional titanium screw fixation for medial malleolar fractures
title_fullStr Bioabsorbable magnesium screw versus conventional titanium screw fixation for medial malleolar fractures
title_full_unstemmed Bioabsorbable magnesium screw versus conventional titanium screw fixation for medial malleolar fractures
title_short Bioabsorbable magnesium screw versus conventional titanium screw fixation for medial malleolar fractures
title_sort bioabsorbable magnesium screw versus conventional titanium screw fixation for medial malleolar fractures
topic Ankle fracture
Medial malleolar fracture
Implant removal
Magnesium screw
Titanium screw
Bioabsorbable implant
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s10195-020-00547-7
work_keys_str_mv AT hasanmay bioabsorbablemagnesiumscrewversusconventionaltitaniumscrewfixationformedialmalleolarfractures
AT yusufalperkati bioabsorbablemagnesiumscrewversusconventionaltitaniumscrewfixationformedialmalleolarfractures
AT gurkangumussuyu bioabsorbablemagnesiumscrewversusconventionaltitaniumscrewfixationformedialmalleolarfractures
AT tuluhanyunusemre bioabsorbablemagnesiumscrewversusconventionaltitaniumscrewfixationformedialmalleolarfractures
AT melihunal bioabsorbablemagnesiumscrewversusconventionaltitaniumscrewfixationformedialmalleolarfractures
AT ozkankose bioabsorbablemagnesiumscrewversusconventionaltitaniumscrewfixationformedialmalleolarfractures