HIV/STIs risks between migrant MSM and local MSM: a cross-sectional comparison study in China

Background. Internal migration plays a significant role in China’s HIV epidemic. However, few studies have directly compared migrant men who have sex with men (MSM) with local MSM with regard to HIV/sexually transmitted infections (STIs) risks. Methods. We conducted a study in Guangzhou, China, with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jie Wu, Hong Wu, Pengsheng Li, Ciyong Lu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2016-07-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/2169.pdf
_version_ 1827606434527838208
author Jie Wu
Hong Wu
Pengsheng Li
Ciyong Lu
author_facet Jie Wu
Hong Wu
Pengsheng Li
Ciyong Lu
author_sort Jie Wu
collection DOAJ
description Background. Internal migration plays a significant role in China’s HIV epidemic. However, few studies have directly compared migrant men who have sex with men (MSM) with local MSM with regard to HIV/sexually transmitted infections (STIs) risks. Methods. We conducted a study in Guangzhou, China, with the aim of understanding the differences in HIV/STIs risks between migrant MSM and local MSM. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 273 migrant MSM and 249 local MSM in Guangzhou, China. Their behavioral and serologic data on HIV/syphilis were collected and compared between the two groups. A multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the associations between HIV/STIs risks and migratory status. Results. Migrant MSM, compared to local MSM, have higher odds of reporting unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) (OR = 1.4; 95% CI [0.9–2.0]) and having multiple homosexual partners (OR = 1.2; 95% CI [0.8–1.8]). A lower rate of condom use at homosexual debut was reported in migrant MSM than in local MSM (OR = 0.7; 95% CI [0.5–0.9]). Migrant MSM have less odds of reporting HIV/STIs testing in the previous 6 months relative to local MSM (OR = 0.5; 95% CI [0.4–0.8]). In addition, migrant MSM demonstrated a lower level of HIV knowledge than local MSM (OR = 0.4; 95% CI [0.2–0.8]). Conclusion. Migrant MSM are more likely to engage in sexual risk behaviors, report a lower level of HIV knowledge and have less access to HIV/STIs testing. Further comprehensive interventions targeting migrant MSM are urged.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T06:38:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6e9e75d0988c46e59e08d606e5c8ce47
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2167-8359
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T06:38:13Z
publishDate 2016-07-01
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format Article
series PeerJ
spelling doaj.art-6e9e75d0988c46e59e08d606e5c8ce472023-12-03T10:55:15ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592016-07-014e216910.7717/peerj.2169HIV/STIs risks between migrant MSM and local MSM: a cross-sectional comparison study in ChinaJie Wu0Hong Wu1Pengsheng Li2Ciyong Lu3Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, ChinaDepartment of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, ChinaDepartment of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, ChinaDepartment of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, ChinaBackground. Internal migration plays a significant role in China’s HIV epidemic. However, few studies have directly compared migrant men who have sex with men (MSM) with local MSM with regard to HIV/sexually transmitted infections (STIs) risks. Methods. We conducted a study in Guangzhou, China, with the aim of understanding the differences in HIV/STIs risks between migrant MSM and local MSM. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 273 migrant MSM and 249 local MSM in Guangzhou, China. Their behavioral and serologic data on HIV/syphilis were collected and compared between the two groups. A multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the associations between HIV/STIs risks and migratory status. Results. Migrant MSM, compared to local MSM, have higher odds of reporting unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) (OR = 1.4; 95% CI [0.9–2.0]) and having multiple homosexual partners (OR = 1.2; 95% CI [0.8–1.8]). A lower rate of condom use at homosexual debut was reported in migrant MSM than in local MSM (OR = 0.7; 95% CI [0.5–0.9]). Migrant MSM have less odds of reporting HIV/STIs testing in the previous 6 months relative to local MSM (OR = 0.5; 95% CI [0.4–0.8]). In addition, migrant MSM demonstrated a lower level of HIV knowledge than local MSM (OR = 0.4; 95% CI [0.2–0.8]). Conclusion. Migrant MSM are more likely to engage in sexual risk behaviors, report a lower level of HIV knowledge and have less access to HIV/STIs testing. Further comprehensive interventions targeting migrant MSM are urged.https://peerj.com/articles/2169.pdfHIV/STIs riskMigrationMSMComparison
spellingShingle Jie Wu
Hong Wu
Pengsheng Li
Ciyong Lu
HIV/STIs risks between migrant MSM and local MSM: a cross-sectional comparison study in China
PeerJ
HIV/STIs risk
Migration
MSM
Comparison
title HIV/STIs risks between migrant MSM and local MSM: a cross-sectional comparison study in China
title_full HIV/STIs risks between migrant MSM and local MSM: a cross-sectional comparison study in China
title_fullStr HIV/STIs risks between migrant MSM and local MSM: a cross-sectional comparison study in China
title_full_unstemmed HIV/STIs risks between migrant MSM and local MSM: a cross-sectional comparison study in China
title_short HIV/STIs risks between migrant MSM and local MSM: a cross-sectional comparison study in China
title_sort hiv stis risks between migrant msm and local msm a cross sectional comparison study in china
topic HIV/STIs risk
Migration
MSM
Comparison
url https://peerj.com/articles/2169.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jiewu hivstisrisksbetweenmigrantmsmandlocalmsmacrosssectionalcomparisonstudyinchina
AT hongwu hivstisrisksbetweenmigrantmsmandlocalmsmacrosssectionalcomparisonstudyinchina
AT pengshengli hivstisrisksbetweenmigrantmsmandlocalmsmacrosssectionalcomparisonstudyinchina
AT ciyonglu hivstisrisksbetweenmigrantmsmandlocalmsmacrosssectionalcomparisonstudyinchina