Structuring the water quality policy problem: Using Q methodology to explore discourses in the Brantas River basin

Recognizing the interrelatedness of water use and conceptual value of IWRM, progressive water resource management systems are moving beyond hierarchical arrangements toward more integrated networks. Increasing calls for participation recognize the value of broadened perspectives that provide both te...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R. Schuyler Houser, Kharis Erasta Reza Pramana, Maurits Willem Ertsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Water
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frwa.2022.1007638/full
_version_ 1797988147293847552
author R. Schuyler Houser
Kharis Erasta Reza Pramana
Maurits Willem Ertsen
author_facet R. Schuyler Houser
Kharis Erasta Reza Pramana
Maurits Willem Ertsen
author_sort R. Schuyler Houser
collection DOAJ
description Recognizing the interrelatedness of water use and conceptual value of IWRM, progressive water resource management systems are moving beyond hierarchical arrangements toward more integrated networks. Increasing calls for participation recognize the value of broadened perspectives that provide both technical expertise as well as social, cultural, and administrative knowledge. Moreover, the call for evidence-based policy of '00s has been tempered by recognition of the political nature of data and science. As such, water decision-makers striving to coproduce and employ shared knowledge must grapple with integrating inputs from diverse participant groups to characterize policy problems and identify effective and feasible solutions. Participatory mandates, coordination bodies, and collaborative networks have emerged to facilitate such integration, and their effective cooperation and alignment relies upon some degree of shared purpose, rather than command and control. But guidance is limited with respect to how to accomplish such integrative aims, including how to support discussions across sectors and silos of practice in order to foster better understanding regarding the problems a policy network collectively aims to address. Motivated by observations within the discourse on water quality in the Brantas River basin in Indonesia, this research explores alternative concepts and problem structures regarding river health via Q methodology. Q methodology, an approach that uses factor analysis to explore human subjectivity, is applied to explore conceptualizations of water quality and the structures of the “water quality problem” in the Brantas. The results show that different groups of perspectives emerge regarding the concept itself, as well as characterization of the current condition of the Brantas. Surprisingly, these variant perspectives do not follow oft-cited government-business-civil society divisions. Moreover, the emergent perspectives demonstrate which aspects of the policy problem are consistent and which are contested, suggesting several starting points for early collaboration and several areas that require further research and facilitated deliberation. The results also offer participants in the collaborative network greater appreciation of the various perspectives and definitions in use, within and across organizations, when discussing water quality.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T07:59:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6ea7042d0fd74056a1b313e7e31a97c0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2624-9375
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T07:59:09Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Water
spelling doaj.art-6ea7042d0fd74056a1b313e7e31a97c02022-12-22T04:35:48ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Water2624-93752022-11-01410.3389/frwa.2022.10076381007638Structuring the water quality policy problem: Using Q methodology to explore discourses in the Brantas River basinR. Schuyler HouserKharis Erasta Reza PramanaMaurits Willem ErtsenRecognizing the interrelatedness of water use and conceptual value of IWRM, progressive water resource management systems are moving beyond hierarchical arrangements toward more integrated networks. Increasing calls for participation recognize the value of broadened perspectives that provide both technical expertise as well as social, cultural, and administrative knowledge. Moreover, the call for evidence-based policy of '00s has been tempered by recognition of the political nature of data and science. As such, water decision-makers striving to coproduce and employ shared knowledge must grapple with integrating inputs from diverse participant groups to characterize policy problems and identify effective and feasible solutions. Participatory mandates, coordination bodies, and collaborative networks have emerged to facilitate such integration, and their effective cooperation and alignment relies upon some degree of shared purpose, rather than command and control. But guidance is limited with respect to how to accomplish such integrative aims, including how to support discussions across sectors and silos of practice in order to foster better understanding regarding the problems a policy network collectively aims to address. Motivated by observations within the discourse on water quality in the Brantas River basin in Indonesia, this research explores alternative concepts and problem structures regarding river health via Q methodology. Q methodology, an approach that uses factor analysis to explore human subjectivity, is applied to explore conceptualizations of water quality and the structures of the “water quality problem” in the Brantas. The results show that different groups of perspectives emerge regarding the concept itself, as well as characterization of the current condition of the Brantas. Surprisingly, these variant perspectives do not follow oft-cited government-business-civil society divisions. Moreover, the emergent perspectives demonstrate which aspects of the policy problem are consistent and which are contested, suggesting several starting points for early collaboration and several areas that require further research and facilitated deliberation. The results also offer participants in the collaborative network greater appreciation of the various perspectives and definitions in use, within and across organizations, when discussing water quality.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frwa.2022.1007638/fullwater quality managementproblem structuringQ methodologyriver healthpolicy framing
spellingShingle R. Schuyler Houser
Kharis Erasta Reza Pramana
Maurits Willem Ertsen
Structuring the water quality policy problem: Using Q methodology to explore discourses in the Brantas River basin
Frontiers in Water
water quality management
problem structuring
Q methodology
river health
policy framing
title Structuring the water quality policy problem: Using Q methodology to explore discourses in the Brantas River basin
title_full Structuring the water quality policy problem: Using Q methodology to explore discourses in the Brantas River basin
title_fullStr Structuring the water quality policy problem: Using Q methodology to explore discourses in the Brantas River basin
title_full_unstemmed Structuring the water quality policy problem: Using Q methodology to explore discourses in the Brantas River basin
title_short Structuring the water quality policy problem: Using Q methodology to explore discourses in the Brantas River basin
title_sort structuring the water quality policy problem using q methodology to explore discourses in the brantas river basin
topic water quality management
problem structuring
Q methodology
river health
policy framing
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frwa.2022.1007638/full
work_keys_str_mv AT rschuylerhouser structuringthewaterqualitypolicyproblemusingqmethodologytoexplorediscoursesinthebrantasriverbasin
AT khariserastarezapramana structuringthewaterqualitypolicyproblemusingqmethodologytoexplorediscoursesinthebrantasriverbasin
AT mauritswillemertsen structuringthewaterqualitypolicyproblemusingqmethodologytoexplorediscoursesinthebrantasriverbasin