Field testing of different methods for monitoring mammals in Trans-Himalayas: A case study from Lahaul and Spiti
Combined surveys based on non-invasive genetic methods and camera trapping increase chances of capturing most of the elusive species which are otherwise challenging to document, especially in high altitude areas due to tough terrains and inaccessibility. The Trans–Himalayan mountain ranges of India...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2020-03-01
|
| Series: | Global Ecology and Conservation |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989419305360 |
| _version_ | 1811197474480586752 |
|---|---|
| author | Bheem Dutt Joshi Amira Sharief Vineet Kumar Manish Kumar Ritam Dutta Romila Devi Ashutosh Singh Mukesh Thakur Lalit Kumar Sharma Kailash Chandra |
| author_facet | Bheem Dutt Joshi Amira Sharief Vineet Kumar Manish Kumar Ritam Dutta Romila Devi Ashutosh Singh Mukesh Thakur Lalit Kumar Sharma Kailash Chandra |
| author_sort | Bheem Dutt Joshi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Combined surveys based on non-invasive genetic methods and camera trapping increase chances of capturing most of the elusive species which are otherwise challenging to document, especially in high altitude areas due to tough terrains and inaccessibility. The Trans–Himalayan mountain ranges of India are neglected ecosystem in the context of faunal assessment and their monitoring. The present study provides a comparative performance of four methods i.e., line transects, camera traps and non-invasive DNA analysis in enumerating the mammalian diversity of Lahaul and Spiti (L&S) in Indian Trans Himalayan region. We undertook sign surveys, field questionnaire, camera trapping, and collected faeces (n = 471) from the trails/transects for DNA analysis. The study was conducted in seven different ranges/blocks of L&S. Together all methods resulted in the identification of 23 species of mammals with two new records, i.e. Asiatic Black bear (Ursus thibetanus) and Leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in the region. Other key species detected are Himalayan Brown bear (Ursus arctos isabellinus), Snow Leopard (Panthera uncia), Tibetian Wolf (Canis lupus). The camera traps performed best with a maximum number of species (19) than the other three methods, i.e. Questionnaire survey (16), indirect sign survey (15) and DNA based (10). However, no significant differences (Kruskal-Wallis, K = 10; P > 0.05) was observed among the methods used for species detection. The camera trap detection varied significantly among the different forest ranges (K = 12; P < 0.004). The DNA based detection aided in overcoming the issue of wrong identification of the faecal samples of closely related species. Out of 471 non-invasive samples 195 (41%) samples resulted in DNA based in species identification. Through this article, we discussed the performance of different methods in detecting mammalian diversity for developing field-tested monitoring protocol specifically for the Trans-Himalayan region. We recommend use of camera trap along with non-invasive sampling for monitoring mammals in the Trans-Himalayas. Keywords: Conservation, Trans-Himalayan ranges, Camera trapping, Non-invasive genetics, Species detection, Comparative assessments |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T01:15:25Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-6ea9e8296f764c43bb1c15cb3ea2daff |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2351-9894 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T01:15:25Z |
| publishDate | 2020-03-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Global Ecology and Conservation |
| spelling | doaj.art-6ea9e8296f764c43bb1c15cb3ea2daff2022-12-22T03:53:59ZengElsevierGlobal Ecology and Conservation2351-98942020-03-0121Field testing of different methods for monitoring mammals in Trans-Himalayas: A case study from Lahaul and SpitiBheem Dutt Joshi0Amira Sharief1Vineet Kumar2Manish Kumar3Ritam Dutta4Romila Devi5Ashutosh Singh6Mukesh Thakur7Lalit Kumar Sharma8Kailash Chandra9Zoological Survey of India, M-block, New Alipore, Kolkata, 700053, IndiaZoological Survey of India, M-block, New Alipore, Kolkata, 700053, IndiaZoological Survey of India, M-block, New Alipore, Kolkata, 700053, IndiaZoological Survey of India, M-block, New Alipore, Kolkata, 700053, IndiaZoological Survey of India, M-block, New Alipore, Kolkata, 700053, IndiaZoological Survey of India, M-block, New Alipore, Kolkata, 700053, IndiaZoological Survey of India, M-block, New Alipore, Kolkata, 700053, IndiaZoological Survey of India, M-block, New Alipore, Kolkata, 700053, IndiaCorresponding author.; Zoological Survey of India, M-block, New Alipore, Kolkata, 700053, IndiaZoological Survey of India, M-block, New Alipore, Kolkata, 700053, IndiaCombined surveys based on non-invasive genetic methods and camera trapping increase chances of capturing most of the elusive species which are otherwise challenging to document, especially in high altitude areas due to tough terrains and inaccessibility. The Trans–Himalayan mountain ranges of India are neglected ecosystem in the context of faunal assessment and their monitoring. The present study provides a comparative performance of four methods i.e., line transects, camera traps and non-invasive DNA analysis in enumerating the mammalian diversity of Lahaul and Spiti (L&S) in Indian Trans Himalayan region. We undertook sign surveys, field questionnaire, camera trapping, and collected faeces (n = 471) from the trails/transects for DNA analysis. The study was conducted in seven different ranges/blocks of L&S. Together all methods resulted in the identification of 23 species of mammals with two new records, i.e. Asiatic Black bear (Ursus thibetanus) and Leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in the region. Other key species detected are Himalayan Brown bear (Ursus arctos isabellinus), Snow Leopard (Panthera uncia), Tibetian Wolf (Canis lupus). The camera traps performed best with a maximum number of species (19) than the other three methods, i.e. Questionnaire survey (16), indirect sign survey (15) and DNA based (10). However, no significant differences (Kruskal-Wallis, K = 10; P > 0.05) was observed among the methods used for species detection. The camera trap detection varied significantly among the different forest ranges (K = 12; P < 0.004). The DNA based detection aided in overcoming the issue of wrong identification of the faecal samples of closely related species. Out of 471 non-invasive samples 195 (41%) samples resulted in DNA based in species identification. Through this article, we discussed the performance of different methods in detecting mammalian diversity for developing field-tested monitoring protocol specifically for the Trans-Himalayan region. We recommend use of camera trap along with non-invasive sampling for monitoring mammals in the Trans-Himalayas. Keywords: Conservation, Trans-Himalayan ranges, Camera trapping, Non-invasive genetics, Species detection, Comparative assessmentshttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989419305360 |
| spellingShingle | Bheem Dutt Joshi Amira Sharief Vineet Kumar Manish Kumar Ritam Dutta Romila Devi Ashutosh Singh Mukesh Thakur Lalit Kumar Sharma Kailash Chandra Field testing of different methods for monitoring mammals in Trans-Himalayas: A case study from Lahaul and Spiti Global Ecology and Conservation |
| title | Field testing of different methods for monitoring mammals in Trans-Himalayas: A case study from Lahaul and Spiti |
| title_full | Field testing of different methods for monitoring mammals in Trans-Himalayas: A case study from Lahaul and Spiti |
| title_fullStr | Field testing of different methods for monitoring mammals in Trans-Himalayas: A case study from Lahaul and Spiti |
| title_full_unstemmed | Field testing of different methods for monitoring mammals in Trans-Himalayas: A case study from Lahaul and Spiti |
| title_short | Field testing of different methods for monitoring mammals in Trans-Himalayas: A case study from Lahaul and Spiti |
| title_sort | field testing of different methods for monitoring mammals in trans himalayas a case study from lahaul and spiti |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989419305360 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bheemduttjoshi fieldtestingofdifferentmethodsformonitoringmammalsintranshimalayasacasestudyfromlahaulandspiti AT amirasharief fieldtestingofdifferentmethodsformonitoringmammalsintranshimalayasacasestudyfromlahaulandspiti AT vineetkumar fieldtestingofdifferentmethodsformonitoringmammalsintranshimalayasacasestudyfromlahaulandspiti AT manishkumar fieldtestingofdifferentmethodsformonitoringmammalsintranshimalayasacasestudyfromlahaulandspiti AT ritamdutta fieldtestingofdifferentmethodsformonitoringmammalsintranshimalayasacasestudyfromlahaulandspiti AT romiladevi fieldtestingofdifferentmethodsformonitoringmammalsintranshimalayasacasestudyfromlahaulandspiti AT ashutoshsingh fieldtestingofdifferentmethodsformonitoringmammalsintranshimalayasacasestudyfromlahaulandspiti AT mukeshthakur fieldtestingofdifferentmethodsformonitoringmammalsintranshimalayasacasestudyfromlahaulandspiti AT lalitkumarsharma fieldtestingofdifferentmethodsformonitoringmammalsintranshimalayasacasestudyfromlahaulandspiti AT kailashchandra fieldtestingofdifferentmethodsformonitoringmammalsintranshimalayasacasestudyfromlahaulandspiti |