Comparing Catch Efficiency of Crayfish (<i>Procambarus clarkii</i>) Traps with Different Entrance Numbers

Traps with various designs have been developed for improving catch efficiency. Traditionally, traps with two or three entrances have been used in recreational crayfish (<i>Procambarus clarkii</i>) fisheries in China. More recently, traps with more than three entrances have been used in f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhaohai Cheng, Margaret H. Folkins, Liuyi Huang, Ye Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-11-01
Series:Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/10/11/1708
_version_ 1797467651487825920
author Zhaohai Cheng
Margaret H. Folkins
Liuyi Huang
Ye Li
author_facet Zhaohai Cheng
Margaret H. Folkins
Liuyi Huang
Ye Li
author_sort Zhaohai Cheng
collection DOAJ
description Traps with various designs have been developed for improving catch efficiency. Traditionally, traps with two or three entrances have been used in recreational crayfish (<i>Procambarus clarkii</i>) fisheries in China. More recently, traps with more than three entrances have been used in fisheries; however, it is unclear whether increasing the number of entrances on a trap increases crayfish capture efficiency. In this research, we evaluated and compared the capture efficiency of crayfish with traps varying in numbers of entrances (2–7). We assessed the catch per unit effort (CPUE) of crayfish in traps through 10 fishing trials. Our results suggested that CPUE did not differ significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.070) among the tested traps; however, CPUE by weight did vary significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.029) among the traps. The tested six-entrance traps caught more crayfish by weight than the five-entrance traps (<i>p</i> = 0.019). The results also revealed that the entrance number did not significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.29) affect the size of crayfish captured. The results are of practical significance for stakeholders to choose traps with efficient designs, and they are important for understanding and improving the catch efficiency of traps.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T18:56:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6ec72f216809405f9d2bb4cdf7fdd851
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-1312
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T18:56:43Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
spelling doaj.art-6ec72f216809405f9d2bb4cdf7fdd8512023-11-24T05:23:15ZengMDPI AGJournal of Marine Science and Engineering2077-13122022-11-011011170810.3390/jmse10111708Comparing Catch Efficiency of Crayfish (<i>Procambarus clarkii</i>) Traps with Different Entrance NumbersZhaohai Cheng0Margaret H. Folkins1Liuyi Huang2Ye Li3School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hubei Polytechnic University, Huangshi 435003, ChinaTriNav Fisheries Consultants, Dartmouth, NS B3B 1N3, CanadaCollege of Fisheries, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, ChinaSchool of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, ChinaTraps with various designs have been developed for improving catch efficiency. Traditionally, traps with two or three entrances have been used in recreational crayfish (<i>Procambarus clarkii</i>) fisheries in China. More recently, traps with more than three entrances have been used in fisheries; however, it is unclear whether increasing the number of entrances on a trap increases crayfish capture efficiency. In this research, we evaluated and compared the capture efficiency of crayfish with traps varying in numbers of entrances (2–7). We assessed the catch per unit effort (CPUE) of crayfish in traps through 10 fishing trials. Our results suggested that CPUE did not differ significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.070) among the tested traps; however, CPUE by weight did vary significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.029) among the traps. The tested six-entrance traps caught more crayfish by weight than the five-entrance traps (<i>p</i> = 0.019). The results also revealed that the entrance number did not significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.29) affect the size of crayfish captured. The results are of practical significance for stakeholders to choose traps with efficient designs, and they are important for understanding and improving the catch efficiency of traps.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/10/11/1708crayfish trapcatch efficiencyCPUEtrap entrance<i>Procambarus clarkia</i>
spellingShingle Zhaohai Cheng
Margaret H. Folkins
Liuyi Huang
Ye Li
Comparing Catch Efficiency of Crayfish (<i>Procambarus clarkii</i>) Traps with Different Entrance Numbers
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
crayfish trap
catch efficiency
CPUE
trap entrance
<i>Procambarus clarkia</i>
title Comparing Catch Efficiency of Crayfish (<i>Procambarus clarkii</i>) Traps with Different Entrance Numbers
title_full Comparing Catch Efficiency of Crayfish (<i>Procambarus clarkii</i>) Traps with Different Entrance Numbers
title_fullStr Comparing Catch Efficiency of Crayfish (<i>Procambarus clarkii</i>) Traps with Different Entrance Numbers
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Catch Efficiency of Crayfish (<i>Procambarus clarkii</i>) Traps with Different Entrance Numbers
title_short Comparing Catch Efficiency of Crayfish (<i>Procambarus clarkii</i>) Traps with Different Entrance Numbers
title_sort comparing catch efficiency of crayfish i procambarus clarkii i traps with different entrance numbers
topic crayfish trap
catch efficiency
CPUE
trap entrance
<i>Procambarus clarkia</i>
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/10/11/1708
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaohaicheng comparingcatchefficiencyofcrayfishiprocambarusclarkiiitrapswithdifferententrancenumbers
AT margarethfolkins comparingcatchefficiencyofcrayfishiprocambarusclarkiiitrapswithdifferententrancenumbers
AT liuyihuang comparingcatchefficiencyofcrayfishiprocambarusclarkiiitrapswithdifferententrancenumbers
AT yeli comparingcatchefficiencyofcrayfishiprocambarusclarkiiitrapswithdifferententrancenumbers