Comparing Catch Efficiency of Crayfish (<i>Procambarus clarkii</i>) Traps with Different Entrance Numbers
Traps with various designs have been developed for improving catch efficiency. Traditionally, traps with two or three entrances have been used in recreational crayfish (<i>Procambarus clarkii</i>) fisheries in China. More recently, traps with more than three entrances have been used in f...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-11-01
|
Series: | Journal of Marine Science and Engineering |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/10/11/1708 |
_version_ | 1797467651487825920 |
---|---|
author | Zhaohai Cheng Margaret H. Folkins Liuyi Huang Ye Li |
author_facet | Zhaohai Cheng Margaret H. Folkins Liuyi Huang Ye Li |
author_sort | Zhaohai Cheng |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Traps with various designs have been developed for improving catch efficiency. Traditionally, traps with two or three entrances have been used in recreational crayfish (<i>Procambarus clarkii</i>) fisheries in China. More recently, traps with more than three entrances have been used in fisheries; however, it is unclear whether increasing the number of entrances on a trap increases crayfish capture efficiency. In this research, we evaluated and compared the capture efficiency of crayfish with traps varying in numbers of entrances (2–7). We assessed the catch per unit effort (CPUE) of crayfish in traps through 10 fishing trials. Our results suggested that CPUE did not differ significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.070) among the tested traps; however, CPUE by weight did vary significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.029) among the traps. The tested six-entrance traps caught more crayfish by weight than the five-entrance traps (<i>p</i> = 0.019). The results also revealed that the entrance number did not significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.29) affect the size of crayfish captured. The results are of practical significance for stakeholders to choose traps with efficient designs, and they are important for understanding and improving the catch efficiency of traps. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T18:56:43Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-6ec72f216809405f9d2bb4cdf7fdd851 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2077-1312 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T18:56:43Z |
publishDate | 2022-11-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Marine Science and Engineering |
spelling | doaj.art-6ec72f216809405f9d2bb4cdf7fdd8512023-11-24T05:23:15ZengMDPI AGJournal of Marine Science and Engineering2077-13122022-11-011011170810.3390/jmse10111708Comparing Catch Efficiency of Crayfish (<i>Procambarus clarkii</i>) Traps with Different Entrance NumbersZhaohai Cheng0Margaret H. Folkins1Liuyi Huang2Ye Li3School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hubei Polytechnic University, Huangshi 435003, ChinaTriNav Fisheries Consultants, Dartmouth, NS B3B 1N3, CanadaCollege of Fisheries, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, ChinaSchool of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, ChinaTraps with various designs have been developed for improving catch efficiency. Traditionally, traps with two or three entrances have been used in recreational crayfish (<i>Procambarus clarkii</i>) fisheries in China. More recently, traps with more than three entrances have been used in fisheries; however, it is unclear whether increasing the number of entrances on a trap increases crayfish capture efficiency. In this research, we evaluated and compared the capture efficiency of crayfish with traps varying in numbers of entrances (2–7). We assessed the catch per unit effort (CPUE) of crayfish in traps through 10 fishing trials. Our results suggested that CPUE did not differ significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.070) among the tested traps; however, CPUE by weight did vary significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.029) among the traps. The tested six-entrance traps caught more crayfish by weight than the five-entrance traps (<i>p</i> = 0.019). The results also revealed that the entrance number did not significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.29) affect the size of crayfish captured. The results are of practical significance for stakeholders to choose traps with efficient designs, and they are important for understanding and improving the catch efficiency of traps.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/10/11/1708crayfish trapcatch efficiencyCPUEtrap entrance<i>Procambarus clarkia</i> |
spellingShingle | Zhaohai Cheng Margaret H. Folkins Liuyi Huang Ye Li Comparing Catch Efficiency of Crayfish (<i>Procambarus clarkii</i>) Traps with Different Entrance Numbers Journal of Marine Science and Engineering crayfish trap catch efficiency CPUE trap entrance <i>Procambarus clarkia</i> |
title | Comparing Catch Efficiency of Crayfish (<i>Procambarus clarkii</i>) Traps with Different Entrance Numbers |
title_full | Comparing Catch Efficiency of Crayfish (<i>Procambarus clarkii</i>) Traps with Different Entrance Numbers |
title_fullStr | Comparing Catch Efficiency of Crayfish (<i>Procambarus clarkii</i>) Traps with Different Entrance Numbers |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing Catch Efficiency of Crayfish (<i>Procambarus clarkii</i>) Traps with Different Entrance Numbers |
title_short | Comparing Catch Efficiency of Crayfish (<i>Procambarus clarkii</i>) Traps with Different Entrance Numbers |
title_sort | comparing catch efficiency of crayfish i procambarus clarkii i traps with different entrance numbers |
topic | crayfish trap catch efficiency CPUE trap entrance <i>Procambarus clarkia</i> |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/10/11/1708 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaohaicheng comparingcatchefficiencyofcrayfishiprocambarusclarkiiitrapswithdifferententrancenumbers AT margarethfolkins comparingcatchefficiencyofcrayfishiprocambarusclarkiiitrapswithdifferententrancenumbers AT liuyihuang comparingcatchefficiencyofcrayfishiprocambarusclarkiiitrapswithdifferententrancenumbers AT yeli comparingcatchefficiencyofcrayfishiprocambarusclarkiiitrapswithdifferententrancenumbers |