Remarks on the Compatibility of Opposite Arrows of Time II
In a series of papers [1,2,3], Lawrence Schulman presented examples which demonstrate the compatibility of opposite arrows of time in various situations. In a previous letter to this journal [4] I questioned some of them for not being realistic in spite of being logically correct. Schulman replied [...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2006-04-01
|
Series: | Entropy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/8/2/44/ |
_version_ | 1818015438229995520 |
---|---|
author | H. D. Zeh |
author_facet | H. D. Zeh |
author_sort | H. D. Zeh |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In a series of papers [1,2,3], Lawrence Schulman presented examples which demonstrate the compatibility of opposite arrows of time in various situations. In a previous letter to this journal [4] I questioned some of them for not being realistic in spite of being logically correct. Schulman replied [5] to these objections in a letter directly succeeding my one. I am here trying to clarify some aspects of the dispute, thereby further explaining and supporting my previous conclusions. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-14T06:57:03Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-6ed64c6c1be0486aadab7dd0c5cee5c5 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1099-4300 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-14T06:57:03Z |
publishDate | 2006-04-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Entropy |
spelling | doaj.art-6ed64c6c1be0486aadab7dd0c5cee5c52022-12-22T02:06:51ZengMDPI AGEntropy1099-43002006-04-0182444910.3390/e8010044Remarks on the Compatibility of Opposite Arrows of Time IIH. D. ZehIn a series of papers [1,2,3], Lawrence Schulman presented examples which demonstrate the compatibility of opposite arrows of time in various situations. In a previous letter to this journal [4] I questioned some of them for not being realistic in spite of being logically correct. Schulman replied [5] to these objections in a letter directly succeeding my one. I am here trying to clarify some aspects of the dispute, thereby further explaining and supporting my previous conclusions.http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/8/2/44/time arrowfinal conditionssolvable modelscausalityretardationquantum measurementsgravitational entropycosmology. |
spellingShingle | H. D. Zeh Remarks on the Compatibility of Opposite Arrows of Time II Entropy time arrow final conditions solvable models causality retardation quantum measurements gravitational entropy cosmology. |
title | Remarks on the Compatibility of Opposite Arrows of Time II |
title_full | Remarks on the Compatibility of Opposite Arrows of Time II |
title_fullStr | Remarks on the Compatibility of Opposite Arrows of Time II |
title_full_unstemmed | Remarks on the Compatibility of Opposite Arrows of Time II |
title_short | Remarks on the Compatibility of Opposite Arrows of Time II |
title_sort | remarks on the compatibility of opposite arrows of time ii |
topic | time arrow final conditions solvable models causality retardation quantum measurements gravitational entropy cosmology. |
url | http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/8/2/44/ |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hdzeh remarksonthecompatibilityofoppositearrowsoftimeii |