The timing of 40% oral dextrose gel administration after birth does not influence the incidence of hypoglycemia in at-risk infants

Background: Hypoglycemia is the most common metabolic disorder seen in newborns and can cause long-term neurological damage, developmental disorders and poor later school performance. In recent years, the use of oral dextrose gel is widely used as a first-line treatment for prevention of asymptomati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: De Bernardo Giuseppe, Giordano Maurizio, Langella Carmen, Piccirillo Daiana, Giada Zollo, Sordino Desiree, Morlino Francesca, Beretta Virginia, Perrone Serafina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-03-01
Series:Global Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667009724000058
_version_ 1797261775947694080
author De Bernardo Giuseppe
Giordano Maurizio
Langella Carmen
Piccirillo Daiana
Giada Zollo
Sordino Desiree
Morlino Francesca
Beretta Virginia
Perrone Serafina
author_facet De Bernardo Giuseppe
Giordano Maurizio
Langella Carmen
Piccirillo Daiana
Giada Zollo
Sordino Desiree
Morlino Francesca
Beretta Virginia
Perrone Serafina
author_sort De Bernardo Giuseppe
collection DOAJ
description Background: Hypoglycemia is the most common metabolic disorder seen in newborns and can cause long-term neurological damage, developmental disorders and poor later school performance. In recent years, the use of oral dextrose gel is widely used as a first-line treatment for prevention of asymptomatic neonatal hypoglycemia. Primary aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of oral administration of 40 % dextrose gel at 30 or 60 min of life on the incidence of hypoglycemia in at-risk infants born by vaginal or cesarean delivery in the first 48 h of life. Secondary aim was to evaluate if the oral administration of 40 % dextrose gel can decrease the use of formula milk. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted at the Buon Consiglio Fatebenefratelli Hospital. Newborns birth by vaginal or Caesarean section and that assumed 40 % dextrose gel at 30 or 60 min after birth were respectively divided in 4 groups (Group A, Group B, Group C and Group D). Glycemic monitoring was then carried out with serial measurements at 2, 4, 6, 12 and 48 h of life. Results: No statistically significant differences were found in the reduction of the incidence of hypoglycemia with respect to the timing of administration of the dextrose gel (χ2(3)=0,450; p = 0,930). The use of formula milk was higher in newborns born by Caesarean section that assumed dextrose gel at 30 min of life than other groups (χ2(3)=11,616; p = 0,009; OR (95 %CI)= 3,033 (1,286–7,153). Conclusions: The use of 40 % oral dextrose gel is a useful strategy for the prevention of hypoglycemia especially in infants at risk, independently to mode of delivery. Timing of administration of dextrose gel did not have effect on the incidence of hypoglycemia among groups. Newborns born by Caesarean section and that assumed 40 % oral dextrose gel at 30 min of life assume more formula milk compared to other groups.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T11:24:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6ee09e1009f54680a53d5e611a485a83
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2667-0097
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T23:46:35Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Global Pediatrics
spelling doaj.art-6ee09e1009f54680a53d5e611a485a832024-03-15T04:44:55ZengElsevierGlobal Pediatrics2667-00972024-03-017100137The timing of 40% oral dextrose gel administration after birth does not influence the incidence of hypoglycemia in at-risk infantsDe Bernardo Giuseppe0Giordano Maurizio1Langella Carmen2Piccirillo Daiana3Giada Zollo4Sordino Desiree5Morlino Francesca6Beretta Virginia7Perrone Serafina8Department of Woman and Child, Ospedale Buon Consiglio Fatebenefratelli, Naples, Italy; Corresponding author.Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, ItalyDepartment of Woman and Child, Ospedale Buon Consiglio Fatebenefratelli, Naples, ItalyDepartment of Woman and Child, Ospedale Buon Consiglio Fatebenefratelli, Naples, ItalyDepartment of Woman and Child, Ospedale Buon Consiglio Fatebenefratelli, Naples, ItalyDepartment of Emergency, NICU, A.O.R.N. Santobono-Pausillipon, Naples, ItalyDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, Section of Pediatrics, Federico II University, Naples, ItalyNeonatology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Pietro Barilla Children's Hospital, Parma, ItalyNeonatology Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Pietro Barilla Children's Hospital, Parma, ItalyBackground: Hypoglycemia is the most common metabolic disorder seen in newborns and can cause long-term neurological damage, developmental disorders and poor later school performance. In recent years, the use of oral dextrose gel is widely used as a first-line treatment for prevention of asymptomatic neonatal hypoglycemia. Primary aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of oral administration of 40 % dextrose gel at 30 or 60 min of life on the incidence of hypoglycemia in at-risk infants born by vaginal or cesarean delivery in the first 48 h of life. Secondary aim was to evaluate if the oral administration of 40 % dextrose gel can decrease the use of formula milk. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted at the Buon Consiglio Fatebenefratelli Hospital. Newborns birth by vaginal or Caesarean section and that assumed 40 % dextrose gel at 30 or 60 min after birth were respectively divided in 4 groups (Group A, Group B, Group C and Group D). Glycemic monitoring was then carried out with serial measurements at 2, 4, 6, 12 and 48 h of life. Results: No statistically significant differences were found in the reduction of the incidence of hypoglycemia with respect to the timing of administration of the dextrose gel (χ2(3)=0,450; p = 0,930). The use of formula milk was higher in newborns born by Caesarean section that assumed dextrose gel at 30 min of life than other groups (χ2(3)=11,616; p = 0,009; OR (95 %CI)= 3,033 (1,286–7,153). Conclusions: The use of 40 % oral dextrose gel is a useful strategy for the prevention of hypoglycemia especially in infants at risk, independently to mode of delivery. Timing of administration of dextrose gel did not have effect on the incidence of hypoglycemia among groups. Newborns born by Caesarean section and that assumed 40 % oral dextrose gel at 30 min of life assume more formula milk compared to other groups.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667009724000058HypoglycemiaDextrose gelLate pretermSmall for gestational ageLarge for gestational age
spellingShingle De Bernardo Giuseppe
Giordano Maurizio
Langella Carmen
Piccirillo Daiana
Giada Zollo
Sordino Desiree
Morlino Francesca
Beretta Virginia
Perrone Serafina
The timing of 40% oral dextrose gel administration after birth does not influence the incidence of hypoglycemia in at-risk infants
Global Pediatrics
Hypoglycemia
Dextrose gel
Late preterm
Small for gestational age
Large for gestational age
title The timing of 40% oral dextrose gel administration after birth does not influence the incidence of hypoglycemia in at-risk infants
title_full The timing of 40% oral dextrose gel administration after birth does not influence the incidence of hypoglycemia in at-risk infants
title_fullStr The timing of 40% oral dextrose gel administration after birth does not influence the incidence of hypoglycemia in at-risk infants
title_full_unstemmed The timing of 40% oral dextrose gel administration after birth does not influence the incidence of hypoglycemia in at-risk infants
title_short The timing of 40% oral dextrose gel administration after birth does not influence the incidence of hypoglycemia in at-risk infants
title_sort timing of 40 oral dextrose gel administration after birth does not influence the incidence of hypoglycemia in at risk infants
topic Hypoglycemia
Dextrose gel
Late preterm
Small for gestational age
Large for gestational age
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667009724000058
work_keys_str_mv AT debernardogiuseppe thetimingof40oraldextrosegeladministrationafterbirthdoesnotinfluencetheincidenceofhypoglycemiainatriskinfants
AT giordanomaurizio thetimingof40oraldextrosegeladministrationafterbirthdoesnotinfluencetheincidenceofhypoglycemiainatriskinfants
AT langellacarmen thetimingof40oraldextrosegeladministrationafterbirthdoesnotinfluencetheincidenceofhypoglycemiainatriskinfants
AT piccirillodaiana thetimingof40oraldextrosegeladministrationafterbirthdoesnotinfluencetheincidenceofhypoglycemiainatriskinfants
AT giadazollo thetimingof40oraldextrosegeladministrationafterbirthdoesnotinfluencetheincidenceofhypoglycemiainatriskinfants
AT sordinodesiree thetimingof40oraldextrosegeladministrationafterbirthdoesnotinfluencetheincidenceofhypoglycemiainatriskinfants
AT morlinofrancesca thetimingof40oraldextrosegeladministrationafterbirthdoesnotinfluencetheincidenceofhypoglycemiainatriskinfants
AT berettavirginia thetimingof40oraldextrosegeladministrationafterbirthdoesnotinfluencetheincidenceofhypoglycemiainatriskinfants
AT perroneserafina thetimingof40oraldextrosegeladministrationafterbirthdoesnotinfluencetheincidenceofhypoglycemiainatriskinfants
AT debernardogiuseppe timingof40oraldextrosegeladministrationafterbirthdoesnotinfluencetheincidenceofhypoglycemiainatriskinfants
AT giordanomaurizio timingof40oraldextrosegeladministrationafterbirthdoesnotinfluencetheincidenceofhypoglycemiainatriskinfants
AT langellacarmen timingof40oraldextrosegeladministrationafterbirthdoesnotinfluencetheincidenceofhypoglycemiainatriskinfants
AT piccirillodaiana timingof40oraldextrosegeladministrationafterbirthdoesnotinfluencetheincidenceofhypoglycemiainatriskinfants
AT giadazollo timingof40oraldextrosegeladministrationafterbirthdoesnotinfluencetheincidenceofhypoglycemiainatriskinfants
AT sordinodesiree timingof40oraldextrosegeladministrationafterbirthdoesnotinfluencetheincidenceofhypoglycemiainatriskinfants
AT morlinofrancesca timingof40oraldextrosegeladministrationafterbirthdoesnotinfluencetheincidenceofhypoglycemiainatriskinfants
AT berettavirginia timingof40oraldextrosegeladministrationafterbirthdoesnotinfluencetheincidenceofhypoglycemiainatriskinfants
AT perroneserafina timingof40oraldextrosegeladministrationafterbirthdoesnotinfluencetheincidenceofhypoglycemiainatriskinfants