Affective polarization and coalition preferences in times of pandemic

Using the RepResent Voter Panel Survey conducted in Belgium since the 2019 Federal elections, we investigate the relationship between affective polarization and voters' coalition preferences, in the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results confirm a strict negative link between affective p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luca Bettarelli, Emilie Van Haute
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Political Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2022.945161/full
_version_ 1818085123115974656
author Luca Bettarelli
Emilie Van Haute
author_facet Luca Bettarelli
Emilie Van Haute
author_sort Luca Bettarelli
collection DOAJ
description Using the RepResent Voter Panel Survey conducted in Belgium since the 2019 Federal elections, we investigate the relationship between affective polarization and voters' coalition preferences, in the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results confirm a strict negative link between affective polarization and preferences for coalitions in general. Such result is robust to different types of coalitions, in terms of number and size of parties, as well as the ideological position of voters. However, we also show how the negative effect of affective polarization can be moderated if the coalition includes the voter's in-party. Overall, our results help better understanding the political consequences of affective polarization in a multiparty setting.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T20:04:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6ee83c24029f493982acca7257695fe6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-3145
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T20:04:46Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Political Science
spelling doaj.art-6ee83c24029f493982acca7257695fe62022-12-22T01:35:24ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Political Science2673-31452022-08-01410.3389/fpos.2022.945161945161Affective polarization and coalition preferences in times of pandemicLuca BettarelliEmilie Van HauteUsing the RepResent Voter Panel Survey conducted in Belgium since the 2019 Federal elections, we investigate the relationship between affective polarization and voters' coalition preferences, in the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results confirm a strict negative link between affective polarization and preferences for coalitions in general. Such result is robust to different types of coalitions, in terms of number and size of parties, as well as the ideological position of voters. However, we also show how the negative effect of affective polarization can be moderated if the coalition includes the voter's in-party. Overall, our results help better understanding the political consequences of affective polarization in a multiparty setting.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2022.945161/fullaffective polarizationCOVID-19Belgiumcoalition governmentideological polarization
spellingShingle Luca Bettarelli
Emilie Van Haute
Affective polarization and coalition preferences in times of pandemic
Frontiers in Political Science
affective polarization
COVID-19
Belgium
coalition government
ideological polarization
title Affective polarization and coalition preferences in times of pandemic
title_full Affective polarization and coalition preferences in times of pandemic
title_fullStr Affective polarization and coalition preferences in times of pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Affective polarization and coalition preferences in times of pandemic
title_short Affective polarization and coalition preferences in times of pandemic
title_sort affective polarization and coalition preferences in times of pandemic
topic affective polarization
COVID-19
Belgium
coalition government
ideological polarization
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2022.945161/full
work_keys_str_mv AT lucabettarelli affectivepolarizationandcoalitionpreferencesintimesofpandemic
AT emilievanhaute affectivepolarizationandcoalitionpreferencesintimesofpandemic