Comparisons of Two Bioelectrical Impedance Devices and Manual versus Sensor-Based Short Physical Performance Batteries for Assessment of Muscle Mass and Physical Performance

The assessment of muscle mass and physical performance is essential for the diagnosis of sarcopenia. This study examined the validity of bioimpedance analysis (BIA) and a sensor-based short physical performance battery (SPPB) device for analyzing appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) and physical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jin-Young Min, Kyoung-Bok Min
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-06-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/13/6026
_version_ 1797590787843686400
author Jin-Young Min
Kyoung-Bok Min
author_facet Jin-Young Min
Kyoung-Bok Min
author_sort Jin-Young Min
collection DOAJ
description The assessment of muscle mass and physical performance is essential for the diagnosis of sarcopenia. This study examined the validity of bioimpedance analysis (BIA) and a sensor-based short physical performance battery (SPPB) device for analyzing appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) and physical performance. Forty-one older adults were measured for ASM and physical performance with two BIA devices (InBody770 vs. T-SCAN PLUS III) and two SPPB devices (manual mSPPB vs. sensor-based sSPPB). Validity statistics included the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman plots to examine the agreement of data from the BIA (InBody770 vs. T-SCAN PLUS III) and the SPPBs (mSPPB vs. sSPPB). There was a significant ICC for skeletal muscle mass between the T-SCAN PLUS III and InBody770 devices (ICC = 0.8822; <i>p</i> < 0.0001). The mSPPB and sSPPB values showed agreement across all components: 0.8654 for the total scores, 0.8879 for the walking speed, 0.8889 for the chair stand, and 0.6863 for the standing balance. No systemic bias was observed between the two methods for the BIA and SPPB devices. Measurements using the T-SCAN PLUS III and sSPPB seem to be highly correlated with the InBody770 and mSPPB devices in older adults and may be valid for assessing muscle mass and physical performance.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T01:29:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6eec069365fb4bba90d5d7779f18cc27
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T01:29:25Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-6eec069365fb4bba90d5d7779f18cc272023-11-18T17:30:15ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202023-06-012313602610.3390/s23136026Comparisons of Two Bioelectrical Impedance Devices and Manual versus Sensor-Based Short Physical Performance Batteries for Assessment of Muscle Mass and Physical PerformanceJin-Young Min0Kyoung-Bok Min1Veterans Medical Research Institute, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Seoul 05368, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of KoreaThe assessment of muscle mass and physical performance is essential for the diagnosis of sarcopenia. This study examined the validity of bioimpedance analysis (BIA) and a sensor-based short physical performance battery (SPPB) device for analyzing appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) and physical performance. Forty-one older adults were measured for ASM and physical performance with two BIA devices (InBody770 vs. T-SCAN PLUS III) and two SPPB devices (manual mSPPB vs. sensor-based sSPPB). Validity statistics included the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman plots to examine the agreement of data from the BIA (InBody770 vs. T-SCAN PLUS III) and the SPPBs (mSPPB vs. sSPPB). There was a significant ICC for skeletal muscle mass between the T-SCAN PLUS III and InBody770 devices (ICC = 0.8822; <i>p</i> < 0.0001). The mSPPB and sSPPB values showed agreement across all components: 0.8654 for the total scores, 0.8879 for the walking speed, 0.8889 for the chair stand, and 0.6863 for the standing balance. No systemic bias was observed between the two methods for the BIA and SPPB devices. Measurements using the T-SCAN PLUS III and sSPPB seem to be highly correlated with the InBody770 and mSPPB devices in older adults and may be valid for assessing muscle mass and physical performance.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/13/6026sarcopeniamuscle massphysical functionbioimpedance analysisvalidation
spellingShingle Jin-Young Min
Kyoung-Bok Min
Comparisons of Two Bioelectrical Impedance Devices and Manual versus Sensor-Based Short Physical Performance Batteries for Assessment of Muscle Mass and Physical Performance
Sensors
sarcopenia
muscle mass
physical function
bioimpedance analysis
validation
title Comparisons of Two Bioelectrical Impedance Devices and Manual versus Sensor-Based Short Physical Performance Batteries for Assessment of Muscle Mass and Physical Performance
title_full Comparisons of Two Bioelectrical Impedance Devices and Manual versus Sensor-Based Short Physical Performance Batteries for Assessment of Muscle Mass and Physical Performance
title_fullStr Comparisons of Two Bioelectrical Impedance Devices and Manual versus Sensor-Based Short Physical Performance Batteries for Assessment of Muscle Mass and Physical Performance
title_full_unstemmed Comparisons of Two Bioelectrical Impedance Devices and Manual versus Sensor-Based Short Physical Performance Batteries for Assessment of Muscle Mass and Physical Performance
title_short Comparisons of Two Bioelectrical Impedance Devices and Manual versus Sensor-Based Short Physical Performance Batteries for Assessment of Muscle Mass and Physical Performance
title_sort comparisons of two bioelectrical impedance devices and manual versus sensor based short physical performance batteries for assessment of muscle mass and physical performance
topic sarcopenia
muscle mass
physical function
bioimpedance analysis
validation
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/13/6026
work_keys_str_mv AT jinyoungmin comparisonsoftwobioelectricalimpedancedevicesandmanualversussensorbasedshortphysicalperformancebatteriesforassessmentofmusclemassandphysicalperformance
AT kyoungbokmin comparisonsoftwobioelectricalimpedancedevicesandmanualversussensorbasedshortphysicalperformancebatteriesforassessmentofmusclemassandphysicalperformance