Thirteen- to Sixteen-Months Old Infants Are Able to Imitate a Novel Act from Memory in Both Unfamiliar and Familiar Settings But Do Not Show Evidence of Rational Inferential Processes
Gergely et al. (2002) reported that children imitated a novel action – illuminating a light-box by using the forehead – after a delay significantly more often if the hands of the experimenter had been visible in comparison with if they had been covered. In an attempt to explore these findings we con...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017-12-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02186/full |
| _version_ | 1818898292558266368 |
|---|---|
| author | Mikael Heimann Angelica Edorsson Annette Sundqvist Felix-Sebastian Koch |
| author_facet | Mikael Heimann Angelica Edorsson Annette Sundqvist Felix-Sebastian Koch |
| author_sort | Mikael Heimann |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Gergely et al. (2002) reported that children imitated a novel action – illuminating a light-box by using the forehead – after a delay significantly more often if the hands of the experimenter had been visible in comparison with if they had been covered. In an attempt to explore these findings we conducted two studies with a total N of 63 children. Both studies investigated deferred imitation of the action in two conditions, with the hands of the experimenter visible or covered, but the settings differed. Study 1 (n = 30; mean age = 16.6 months) was carried out in an unfamiliar environment (a laboratory setting) while Study 2 (n = 33; mean age = 13.3 months) was conducted in familiar surroundings (at home or at day care). The results showed that 50% of the children in Study 1 and 42.4% in Study 2 evidenced deferred imitation as compared to only 4.9% (n = 2) in the baseline condition. However, in none of the studies did the children use inferential processes when imitating, we detected no significant differences between the two conditions, hands visible or hands covered. The findings add to the validity of the head touch procedure as a measure of declarative-like memory processes in the pre-verbal child. At the same time the findings question the robustness of the concept ‘rational imitation,’ it seems not as easy as expected to elicit a response based on rational inferential processes in this age group. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-19T19:29:45Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-6ef16896a3b949e08c52833134803681 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1664-1078 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-19T19:29:45Z |
| publishDate | 2017-12-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Psychology |
| spelling | doaj.art-6ef16896a3b949e08c528331348036812022-12-21T20:08:38ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782017-12-01810.3389/fpsyg.2017.02186294487Thirteen- to Sixteen-Months Old Infants Are Able to Imitate a Novel Act from Memory in Both Unfamiliar and Familiar Settings But Do Not Show Evidence of Rational Inferential ProcessesMikael HeimannAngelica EdorssonAnnette SundqvistFelix-Sebastian KochGergely et al. (2002) reported that children imitated a novel action – illuminating a light-box by using the forehead – after a delay significantly more often if the hands of the experimenter had been visible in comparison with if they had been covered. In an attempt to explore these findings we conducted two studies with a total N of 63 children. Both studies investigated deferred imitation of the action in two conditions, with the hands of the experimenter visible or covered, but the settings differed. Study 1 (n = 30; mean age = 16.6 months) was carried out in an unfamiliar environment (a laboratory setting) while Study 2 (n = 33; mean age = 13.3 months) was conducted in familiar surroundings (at home or at day care). The results showed that 50% of the children in Study 1 and 42.4% in Study 2 evidenced deferred imitation as compared to only 4.9% (n = 2) in the baseline condition. However, in none of the studies did the children use inferential processes when imitating, we detected no significant differences between the two conditions, hands visible or hands covered. The findings add to the validity of the head touch procedure as a measure of declarative-like memory processes in the pre-verbal child. At the same time the findings question the robustness of the concept ‘rational imitation,’ it seems not as easy as expected to elicit a response based on rational inferential processes in this age group.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02186/fullinfancydeferred imitationrational imitationmemoryfamiliar and unfamiliar settings |
| spellingShingle | Mikael Heimann Angelica Edorsson Annette Sundqvist Felix-Sebastian Koch Thirteen- to Sixteen-Months Old Infants Are Able to Imitate a Novel Act from Memory in Both Unfamiliar and Familiar Settings But Do Not Show Evidence of Rational Inferential Processes Frontiers in Psychology infancy deferred imitation rational imitation memory familiar and unfamiliar settings |
| title | Thirteen- to Sixteen-Months Old Infants Are Able to Imitate a Novel Act from Memory in Both Unfamiliar and Familiar Settings But Do Not Show Evidence of Rational Inferential Processes |
| title_full | Thirteen- to Sixteen-Months Old Infants Are Able to Imitate a Novel Act from Memory in Both Unfamiliar and Familiar Settings But Do Not Show Evidence of Rational Inferential Processes |
| title_fullStr | Thirteen- to Sixteen-Months Old Infants Are Able to Imitate a Novel Act from Memory in Both Unfamiliar and Familiar Settings But Do Not Show Evidence of Rational Inferential Processes |
| title_full_unstemmed | Thirteen- to Sixteen-Months Old Infants Are Able to Imitate a Novel Act from Memory in Both Unfamiliar and Familiar Settings But Do Not Show Evidence of Rational Inferential Processes |
| title_short | Thirteen- to Sixteen-Months Old Infants Are Able to Imitate a Novel Act from Memory in Both Unfamiliar and Familiar Settings But Do Not Show Evidence of Rational Inferential Processes |
| title_sort | thirteen to sixteen months old infants are able to imitate a novel act from memory in both unfamiliar and familiar settings but do not show evidence of rational inferential processes |
| topic | infancy deferred imitation rational imitation memory familiar and unfamiliar settings |
| url | http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02186/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mikaelheimann thirteentosixteenmonthsoldinfantsareabletoimitateanovelactfrommemoryinbothunfamiliarandfamiliarsettingsbutdonotshowevidenceofrationalinferentialprocesses AT angelicaedorsson thirteentosixteenmonthsoldinfantsareabletoimitateanovelactfrommemoryinbothunfamiliarandfamiliarsettingsbutdonotshowevidenceofrationalinferentialprocesses AT annettesundqvist thirteentosixteenmonthsoldinfantsareabletoimitateanovelactfrommemoryinbothunfamiliarandfamiliarsettingsbutdonotshowevidenceofrationalinferentialprocesses AT felixsebastiankoch thirteentosixteenmonthsoldinfantsareabletoimitateanovelactfrommemoryinbothunfamiliarandfamiliarsettingsbutdonotshowevidenceofrationalinferentialprocesses |