Evaluation of the Impact of Bone-in Versus Boneless Cuts on Beef Palatability
Palatability traits of ribeye, strip loin, and tenderloin steaks were evaluated in a bone-in versus boneless format.Sensory characteristics of these cuts were also evaluated in 2 quality grade categories; upper 2/3 USDA Choice and USDA Select to evaluate the interactions of marbling level and bone s...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Iowa State University Digital Press
2022-12-01
|
| Series: | Meat and Muscle Biology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/mmb/article/id/15488/ |
| _version_ | 1797222175156994048 |
|---|---|
| author | Erin Beyer Jessie Vipham Katie R. Lybarger Kaylee J. Farmer Keayla Harr Lane A. Egger Michael Chao Morgan Zumbaugh Samuel G. Davis Travis O'Quinn |
| author_facet | Erin Beyer Jessie Vipham Katie R. Lybarger Kaylee J. Farmer Keayla Harr Lane A. Egger Michael Chao Morgan Zumbaugh Samuel G. Davis Travis O'Quinn |
| author_sort | Erin Beyer |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Palatability traits of ribeye, strip loin, and tenderloin steaks were evaluated in a bone-in versus boneless format.Sensory characteristics of these cuts were also evaluated in 2 quality grade categories; upper 2/3 USDA Choice and USDA Select to evaluate the interactions of marbling level and bone state. Subprimals were collected from both sides of 12 beef carcasses per quality grade and aged for 28 d. Product was fabricated into 2.5-cm-thick steaks and designated for either trained sensory analysis, consumer sensory analysis, Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF), or fat and moisture determination. Results from trained sensory analysis showed bone-in tenderloins and bone-in ribeyes as more flavorful (P<0.05) than boneless cuts from the same muscle. Bone state had no effect (P>0.05) on trained sensory initial juiciness, myofibrillar tenderness, and overall tenderness scores, or WBSF for any cut. Furthermore, tenderloin samples were rated higher (P<0.05) by trained sensory panelists for myofibrillar and overall tenderness than strip loin and ribeye steaks, which were similar (P>0.05). Bone state had no impact (P>0.05) on consumer tenderness and flavor ratings for any of the 3 cuts.However, bone-in strip loin samples were rated juicier and higher (P<0.05) overall than boneless strip loin steaks by consumers. Tenderloin steaks were juicier, more tender, more flavorful, and rated higher overall (P<0.05) than ribeyes and boneless strip loin steaks by consumers. Moreover, there were no differences (P>0.05) between strip loin and ribeye steaks for flavor liking by consumers and no difference (P>0.05) in overall liking rating between ribeyes and boneless striploin steaks. Overall, bone status had a minimal impact on beef palatability traits, providing evidence that eating quality is not greatly impacted by bone status for any of the cuts evaluated. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T13:17:09Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-6efda1faf6214837b8be9e5a7645f537 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2575-985X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T13:17:09Z |
| publishDate | 2022-12-01 |
| publisher | Iowa State University Digital Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Meat and Muscle Biology |
| spelling | doaj.art-6efda1faf6214837b8be9e5a7645f5372024-04-04T17:20:44ZengIowa State University Digital PressMeat and Muscle Biology2575-985X2022-12-016110.22175/mmb.15488Evaluation of the Impact of Bone-in Versus Boneless Cuts on Beef PalatabilityErin Beyer0Jessie Vipham1Katie R. Lybarger2Kaylee J. Farmer3Keayla Harr4Lane A. Egger5Michael Chao6Morgan Zumbaugh7Samuel G. Davis8Travis O'Quinn9North Dakota State UniversityKansas StateAnimal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State UniversityAnimal Sciences and Industry, Kansas StateKansas StateAnimal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State UniversityAnimal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State UniversityKansas StateAnimal Sciences and Industry, Kansas StateN/aPalatability traits of ribeye, strip loin, and tenderloin steaks were evaluated in a bone-in versus boneless format.Sensory characteristics of these cuts were also evaluated in 2 quality grade categories; upper 2/3 USDA Choice and USDA Select to evaluate the interactions of marbling level and bone state. Subprimals were collected from both sides of 12 beef carcasses per quality grade and aged for 28 d. Product was fabricated into 2.5-cm-thick steaks and designated for either trained sensory analysis, consumer sensory analysis, Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF), or fat and moisture determination. Results from trained sensory analysis showed bone-in tenderloins and bone-in ribeyes as more flavorful (P<0.05) than boneless cuts from the same muscle. Bone state had no effect (P>0.05) on trained sensory initial juiciness, myofibrillar tenderness, and overall tenderness scores, or WBSF for any cut. Furthermore, tenderloin samples were rated higher (P<0.05) by trained sensory panelists for myofibrillar and overall tenderness than strip loin and ribeye steaks, which were similar (P>0.05). Bone state had no impact (P>0.05) on consumer tenderness and flavor ratings for any of the 3 cuts.However, bone-in strip loin samples were rated juicier and higher (P<0.05) overall than boneless strip loin steaks by consumers. Tenderloin steaks were juicier, more tender, more flavorful, and rated higher overall (P<0.05) than ribeyes and boneless strip loin steaks by consumers. Moreover, there were no differences (P>0.05) between strip loin and ribeye steaks for flavor liking by consumers and no difference (P>0.05) in overall liking rating between ribeyes and boneless striploin steaks. Overall, bone status had a minimal impact on beef palatability traits, providing evidence that eating quality is not greatly impacted by bone status for any of the cuts evaluated.https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/mmb/article/id/15488/bone-inbonelessconsumerpalatabilitysensorybeef |
| spellingShingle | Erin Beyer Jessie Vipham Katie R. Lybarger Kaylee J. Farmer Keayla Harr Lane A. Egger Michael Chao Morgan Zumbaugh Samuel G. Davis Travis O'Quinn Evaluation of the Impact of Bone-in Versus Boneless Cuts on Beef Palatability Meat and Muscle Biology bone-in boneless consumer palatability sensory beef |
| title | Evaluation of the Impact of Bone-in Versus Boneless Cuts on Beef Palatability |
| title_full | Evaluation of the Impact of Bone-in Versus Boneless Cuts on Beef Palatability |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of the Impact of Bone-in Versus Boneless Cuts on Beef Palatability |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Impact of Bone-in Versus Boneless Cuts on Beef Palatability |
| title_short | Evaluation of the Impact of Bone-in Versus Boneless Cuts on Beef Palatability |
| title_sort | evaluation of the impact of bone in versus boneless cuts on beef palatability |
| topic | bone-in boneless consumer palatability sensory beef |
| url | https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/mmb/article/id/15488/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT erinbeyer evaluationoftheimpactofboneinversusbonelesscutsonbeefpalatability AT jessievipham evaluationoftheimpactofboneinversusbonelesscutsonbeefpalatability AT katierlybarger evaluationoftheimpactofboneinversusbonelesscutsonbeefpalatability AT kayleejfarmer evaluationoftheimpactofboneinversusbonelesscutsonbeefpalatability AT keaylaharr evaluationoftheimpactofboneinversusbonelesscutsonbeefpalatability AT laneaegger evaluationoftheimpactofboneinversusbonelesscutsonbeefpalatability AT michaelchao evaluationoftheimpactofboneinversusbonelesscutsonbeefpalatability AT morganzumbaugh evaluationoftheimpactofboneinversusbonelesscutsonbeefpalatability AT samuelgdavis evaluationoftheimpactofboneinversusbonelesscutsonbeefpalatability AT travisoquinn evaluationoftheimpactofboneinversusbonelesscutsonbeefpalatability |