The comparison of the methods for the identification of pathogenic serotypes and biotypes of Yersinia enterocolitica: Microbiological methods and PCR

In this study, pathogenic strains of Y. enterocolitica were identified by microbiological and PCR methods. The samples were collected from pigs, cattle, poultry, and slaughter houses. Three common techniques were used to isolate Y. enterocolitica from the samples - ITC, PSB, and direct on the CIN. P...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Miroslava Vázlerová, Iva Steinhauserová
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences 2006-10-01
Series:Czech Journal of Food Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cjfs.agriculturejournals.cz/artkey/cjf-200605-0002_the-comparison-of-the-methods-for-the-identification-of-pathogenic-serotypes-and-biotypes-of-yersinia-enterocol.php
_version_ 1828009244795863040
author Miroslava Vázlerová
Iva Steinhauserová
author_facet Miroslava Vázlerová
Iva Steinhauserová
author_sort Miroslava Vázlerová
collection DOAJ
description In this study, pathogenic strains of Y. enterocolitica were identified by microbiological and PCR methods. The samples were collected from pigs, cattle, poultry, and slaughter houses. Three common techniques were used to isolate Y. enterocolitica from the samples - ITC, PSB, and direct on the CIN. Primers A1/A2, Y1/Y2, and rfbC 1/rfbC 2 were used for the specific detection of the pathogenic strains of Y. enterocolitica. Traditional microbiological methods were found to be insufficient for the specific identification of the Y. enterocolitica pathogen. In comparison with PCR which was able to detect 149 strains, the biochemical test could detect only 138 species. These results show that the use of biochemical methods of cultivation did not allow the identification of all Y. enterocolitica pathogens. In total, 149 strains of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica were examined of which 120 were from pigs, 19 from poultry, 8 were cattle strains, and 2 came from the environments of slaughterhouses.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T08:35:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6f11efe64dec41ed80fbd0fb57fea2f8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1212-1800
1805-9317
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T08:35:57Z
publishDate 2006-10-01
publisher Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
record_format Article
series Czech Journal of Food Sciences
spelling doaj.art-6f11efe64dec41ed80fbd0fb57fea2f82023-02-23T03:27:02ZengCzech Academy of Agricultural SciencesCzech Journal of Food Sciences1212-18001805-93172006-10-0124521722210.17221/3316-CJFScjf-200605-0002The comparison of the methods for the identification of pathogenic serotypes and biotypes of Yersinia enterocolitica: Microbiological methods and PCRMiroslava Vázlerová0Iva Steinhauserová1Department of Meat Hygiene and Technology, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech RepublicDepartment of Meat Hygiene and Technology, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech RepublicIn this study, pathogenic strains of Y. enterocolitica were identified by microbiological and PCR methods. The samples were collected from pigs, cattle, poultry, and slaughter houses. Three common techniques were used to isolate Y. enterocolitica from the samples - ITC, PSB, and direct on the CIN. Primers A1/A2, Y1/Y2, and rfbC 1/rfbC 2 were used for the specific detection of the pathogenic strains of Y. enterocolitica. Traditional microbiological methods were found to be insufficient for the specific identification of the Y. enterocolitica pathogen. In comparison with PCR which was able to detect 149 strains, the biochemical test could detect only 138 species. These results show that the use of biochemical methods of cultivation did not allow the identification of all Y. enterocolitica pathogens. In total, 149 strains of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica were examined of which 120 were from pigs, 19 from poultry, 8 were cattle strains, and 2 came from the environments of slaughterhouses.https://cjfs.agriculturejournals.cz/artkey/cjf-200605-0002_the-comparison-of-the-methods-for-the-identification-of-pathogenic-serotypes-and-biotypes-of-yersinia-enterocol.phpyersinia enterocoliticapathogenic serotypepcr detectioncultivationdnaidentificationserotypebiotype
spellingShingle Miroslava Vázlerová
Iva Steinhauserová
The comparison of the methods for the identification of pathogenic serotypes and biotypes of Yersinia enterocolitica: Microbiological methods and PCR
Czech Journal of Food Sciences
yersinia enterocolitica
pathogenic serotype
pcr detection
cultivation
dna
identification
serotype
biotype
title The comparison of the methods for the identification of pathogenic serotypes and biotypes of Yersinia enterocolitica: Microbiological methods and PCR
title_full The comparison of the methods for the identification of pathogenic serotypes and biotypes of Yersinia enterocolitica: Microbiological methods and PCR
title_fullStr The comparison of the methods for the identification of pathogenic serotypes and biotypes of Yersinia enterocolitica: Microbiological methods and PCR
title_full_unstemmed The comparison of the methods for the identification of pathogenic serotypes and biotypes of Yersinia enterocolitica: Microbiological methods and PCR
title_short The comparison of the methods for the identification of pathogenic serotypes and biotypes of Yersinia enterocolitica: Microbiological methods and PCR
title_sort comparison of the methods for the identification of pathogenic serotypes and biotypes of yersinia enterocolitica microbiological methods and pcr
topic yersinia enterocolitica
pathogenic serotype
pcr detection
cultivation
dna
identification
serotype
biotype
url https://cjfs.agriculturejournals.cz/artkey/cjf-200605-0002_the-comparison-of-the-methods-for-the-identification-of-pathogenic-serotypes-and-biotypes-of-yersinia-enterocol.php
work_keys_str_mv AT miroslavavazlerova thecomparisonofthemethodsfortheidentificationofpathogenicserotypesandbiotypesofyersiniaenterocoliticamicrobiologicalmethodsandpcr
AT ivasteinhauserova thecomparisonofthemethodsfortheidentificationofpathogenicserotypesandbiotypesofyersiniaenterocoliticamicrobiologicalmethodsandpcr
AT miroslavavazlerova comparisonofthemethodsfortheidentificationofpathogenicserotypesandbiotypesofyersiniaenterocoliticamicrobiologicalmethodsandpcr
AT ivasteinhauserova comparisonofthemethodsfortheidentificationofpathogenicserotypesandbiotypesofyersiniaenterocoliticamicrobiologicalmethodsandpcr