Certainty of evidence, why?

ABSTRACT Optimal clinical decision-making requires understanding of evidence regarding benefits, harms, and burdens of alternative management options. Rigorously conducted systematic reviews and meta-analyses offer accurate summaries of the evidence. However, such summaries may review only low-certa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: João Pedro Lima, Xiajing Chu, Gordon H Guyatt, Wimonchat Tangamornsuksan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia 2023-08-01
Series:Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132023000400400&lng=en&tlng=en
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT Optimal clinical decision-making requires understanding of evidence regarding benefits, harms, and burdens of alternative management options. Rigorously conducted systematic reviews and meta-analyses offer accurate summaries of the evidence. However, such summaries may review only low-certainty evidence, in the process highlighting that no single decision is likely to be best for all patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach offers a systematic and transparent method for rating certainty of evidence in systematic reviews. In this paper, we will address the importance of assessing the certainty associated with bodies of evidence; explain how the GRADE system rates the certainty of evidence from systematic reviews; and present the GRADE evidence to decision framework for moving from evidence to strong or weak recommendations in clinical practice guidelines.
ISSN:1806-3756