Methodologies for Measuring Judicial Performance: The Problem of Bias
<p>Concerns about gender and racial bias in the survey-based evaluations of judicial performance common in the United States have persisted for decades. Consistent with a large body of basic research in the psychological sciences, recent studies confirm that the results from these JPE surveys...
Main Authors: | Jennifer Elek, David Rottman |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law
2014-12-01
|
Series: | Oñati Socio-Legal Series |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ssrn.com/abstract=2533937 |
Similar Items
-
Judicial Performance Review in Arizona: A Critical Assessment
by: Rebecca White Berch, et al.
Published: (2014-12-01) -
Thinking about Judges and Judicial Performance: Perspective of the Public and Court Users
by: David Rottman, et al.
Published: (2014-12-01) -
Judicial Performance and Experiences of Judicial Work: Findings from Socio-legal Research
by: Sharyn Roach Anleu, et al.
Published: (2014-12-01) -
Evaluating Judicial Performance Evaluation: A Conceptual Analysis
by: Joe McIntyre
Published: (2014-12-01) -
Evaluating Judicial Performance: Editors’ Introduction
by: Francesco Contini, et al.
Published: (2014-12-01)