External validation study of endometrial cancer preoperative risk stratification model (ENDORISK)

IntroductionAmong industrialized countries, endometrial cancer is a common malignancy with generally an excellent outcome. To personalize medicine, we ideally compile as much information as possible concerning patient prognosis prior to effecting an appropriate treatment decision. Endometrial cancer...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Petra Vinklerová, Petra Ovesná, Jitka Hausnerová, Johanna M. A. Pijnenborg, Peter J. F. Lucas, Casper Reijnen, Stephanie Vrede, Vít Weinberger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.939226/full
_version_ 1811343414821650432
author Petra Vinklerová
Petra Ovesná
Jitka Hausnerová
Johanna M. A. Pijnenborg
Peter J. F. Lucas
Casper Reijnen
Stephanie Vrede
Vít Weinberger
author_facet Petra Vinklerová
Petra Ovesná
Jitka Hausnerová
Johanna M. A. Pijnenborg
Peter J. F. Lucas
Casper Reijnen
Stephanie Vrede
Vít Weinberger
author_sort Petra Vinklerová
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionAmong industrialized countries, endometrial cancer is a common malignancy with generally an excellent outcome. To personalize medicine, we ideally compile as much information as possible concerning patient prognosis prior to effecting an appropriate treatment decision. Endometrial cancer preoperative risk stratification (ENDORISK) is a machine learning–based computational Bayesian networks model that predicts lymph node metastasis and 5-year disease-specific survival potential with percentual probability. Our objective included validating ENDORISK effectiveness in our patient cohort, assessing its application in the current use of sentinel node biopsy, and verifying its accuracy in advanced stages.MethodsThe ENDORISK model was evaluated with a retrospective cohort of 425 patients from the University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic. Two hundred ninety-nine patients were involved in our disease-specific survival analysis; 226 cases with known lymph node status were available for lymph node metastasis analysis. Patients were included undergoing either pelvic lymph node dissection (N = 84) or sentinel node biopsy (N =70) to explore the accuracy of both staging procedures.ResultsThe area under the curve was 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77–0.9) for lymph node metastasis analysis and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.79–0.93) for 5-year disease-specific survival evaluation, indicating quite positive concordance between prediction and reality. Calibration plots to visualize results demonstrated an outstanding predictive value for low-risk cancers (grades 1–2), whereas outcomes were underestimated among high-risk patients (grade 3), especially in disease-specific survival. This phenomenon was even more obvious when patients were subclassified according to FIGO clinical stages.ConclusionsOur data confirmed ENDORISK model’s laudable predictive ability, particularly among patients with a low risk of lymph node metastasis and expected favorable survival. For high-risk and/or advanced stages, the ENDORISK network needs to be additionally trained/improved.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T19:29:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6f2e7615f68f4c819aee78bed95cbfab
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2234-943X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T19:29:02Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Oncology
spelling doaj.art-6f2e7615f68f4c819aee78bed95cbfab2022-12-22T02:33:15ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2022-08-011210.3389/fonc.2022.939226939226External validation study of endometrial cancer preoperative risk stratification model (ENDORISK)Petra Vinklerová0Petra Ovesná1Jitka Hausnerová2Johanna M. A. Pijnenborg3Peter J. F. Lucas4Casper Reijnen5Stephanie Vrede6Vít Weinberger7Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, CzechiaInstitute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, CzechiaDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, CzechiaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, NetherlandsDepartment of Data Science, University of Twente, Enschede, NetherlandsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, NetherlandsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, NetherlandsDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, CzechiaIntroductionAmong industrialized countries, endometrial cancer is a common malignancy with generally an excellent outcome. To personalize medicine, we ideally compile as much information as possible concerning patient prognosis prior to effecting an appropriate treatment decision. Endometrial cancer preoperative risk stratification (ENDORISK) is a machine learning–based computational Bayesian networks model that predicts lymph node metastasis and 5-year disease-specific survival potential with percentual probability. Our objective included validating ENDORISK effectiveness in our patient cohort, assessing its application in the current use of sentinel node biopsy, and verifying its accuracy in advanced stages.MethodsThe ENDORISK model was evaluated with a retrospective cohort of 425 patients from the University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic. Two hundred ninety-nine patients were involved in our disease-specific survival analysis; 226 cases with known lymph node status were available for lymph node metastasis analysis. Patients were included undergoing either pelvic lymph node dissection (N = 84) or sentinel node biopsy (N =70) to explore the accuracy of both staging procedures.ResultsThe area under the curve was 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77–0.9) for lymph node metastasis analysis and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.79–0.93) for 5-year disease-specific survival evaluation, indicating quite positive concordance between prediction and reality. Calibration plots to visualize results demonstrated an outstanding predictive value for low-risk cancers (grades 1–2), whereas outcomes were underestimated among high-risk patients (grade 3), especially in disease-specific survival. This phenomenon was even more obvious when patients were subclassified according to FIGO clinical stages.ConclusionsOur data confirmed ENDORISK model’s laudable predictive ability, particularly among patients with a low risk of lymph node metastasis and expected favorable survival. For high-risk and/or advanced stages, the ENDORISK network needs to be additionally trained/improved.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.939226/fullBayesian networks modeldisease-specific survivalendometrial cancerprognosisrisk stratificationsentinel node biopsy
spellingShingle Petra Vinklerová
Petra Ovesná
Jitka Hausnerová
Johanna M. A. Pijnenborg
Peter J. F. Lucas
Casper Reijnen
Stephanie Vrede
Vít Weinberger
External validation study of endometrial cancer preoperative risk stratification model (ENDORISK)
Frontiers in Oncology
Bayesian networks model
disease-specific survival
endometrial cancer
prognosis
risk stratification
sentinel node biopsy
title External validation study of endometrial cancer preoperative risk stratification model (ENDORISK)
title_full External validation study of endometrial cancer preoperative risk stratification model (ENDORISK)
title_fullStr External validation study of endometrial cancer preoperative risk stratification model (ENDORISK)
title_full_unstemmed External validation study of endometrial cancer preoperative risk stratification model (ENDORISK)
title_short External validation study of endometrial cancer preoperative risk stratification model (ENDORISK)
title_sort external validation study of endometrial cancer preoperative risk stratification model endorisk
topic Bayesian networks model
disease-specific survival
endometrial cancer
prognosis
risk stratification
sentinel node biopsy
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.939226/full
work_keys_str_mv AT petravinklerova externalvalidationstudyofendometrialcancerpreoperativeriskstratificationmodelendorisk
AT petraovesna externalvalidationstudyofendometrialcancerpreoperativeriskstratificationmodelendorisk
AT jitkahausnerova externalvalidationstudyofendometrialcancerpreoperativeriskstratificationmodelendorisk
AT johannamapijnenborg externalvalidationstudyofendometrialcancerpreoperativeriskstratificationmodelendorisk
AT peterjflucas externalvalidationstudyofendometrialcancerpreoperativeriskstratificationmodelendorisk
AT casperreijnen externalvalidationstudyofendometrialcancerpreoperativeriskstratificationmodelendorisk
AT stephanievrede externalvalidationstudyofendometrialcancerpreoperativeriskstratificationmodelendorisk
AT vitweinberger externalvalidationstudyofendometrialcancerpreoperativeriskstratificationmodelendorisk