Impact of acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) motion on structure function estimates of turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate

<p>Turbulent mixing is a key process in the transport of heat, salt, and nutrients in the marine environment, with fluxes commonly derived directly from estimates of the turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate, <span class="inline-formula"><i>ε</i></span>....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B. D. Scannell, Y.-D. Lenn, T. P. Rippeth
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2022-02-01
Series:Ocean Science
Online Access:https://os.copernicus.org/articles/18/169/2022/os-18-169-2022.pdf
_version_ 1798030194840174592
author B. D. Scannell
Y.-D. Lenn
T. P. Rippeth
author_facet B. D. Scannell
Y.-D. Lenn
T. P. Rippeth
author_sort B. D. Scannell
collection DOAJ
description <p>Turbulent mixing is a key process in the transport of heat, salt, and nutrients in the marine environment, with fluxes commonly derived directly from estimates of the turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate, <span class="inline-formula"><i>ε</i></span>. Time series of <span class="inline-formula"><i>ε</i></span> estimates are therefore useful in helping to identify and quantify key biogeochemical processes. The velocity structure function method can be used to determine time series of <span class="inline-formula"><i>ε</i></span> estimates using along-beam velocity measurements from suitably configured acoustic Doppler current profilers (ADCPs). Shear in the background current can bias such estimates; therefore, standard practice is to deduct the mean or linear trend from the along-beam velocity over the period of an observation burst. This procedure is effective if the orientation of the ADCP to the current remains constant over the burst period. However, if the orientation of the ADCP varies, a proportion of the velocity difference between bins is retained in the structure function and the resulting <span class="inline-formula"><i>ε</i></span> estimates will be biased. Long-term observations from a mooring with three inline ADCPs show the heading oscillating with an angular range that depends on the flow speed: from large, slow oscillations at low flow speeds to smaller, higher-frequency oscillations at higher flow speeds. The mean tilt was also determined by the flow speed, whilst the tilt oscillation range was primarily determined by surface wave height. Synthesised along-beam velocity data for an ADCP subject to sinusoidal oscillation in a sheared flow indicate that the retained proportion of the potential bias is primarily determined by the angular range of the oscillation, with the impact varying between beams depending on the mean heading relative to the flow. Since the heading is typically unconstrained in a tethered mooring, heading oscillation is likely to be the most significant influence on the retained bias for a given level of shear. Use of an instrument housing designed to reduce oscillation would mitigate the impact, whilst if the shear is linear over the observation depth range, the bias can be corrected using a modified structure function method designed to correct for bias due to surface waves.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-11T19:36:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6f2eef18eab6425ab9f3b072993cf7c5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1812-0784
1812-0792
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T19:36:16Z
publishDate 2022-02-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Ocean Science
spelling doaj.art-6f2eef18eab6425ab9f3b072993cf7c52022-12-22T04:06:50ZengCopernicus PublicationsOcean Science1812-07841812-07922022-02-011816919210.5194/os-18-169-2022Impact of acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) motion on structure function estimates of turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rateB. D. ScannellY.-D. LennT. P. Rippeth<p>Turbulent mixing is a key process in the transport of heat, salt, and nutrients in the marine environment, with fluxes commonly derived directly from estimates of the turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate, <span class="inline-formula"><i>ε</i></span>. Time series of <span class="inline-formula"><i>ε</i></span> estimates are therefore useful in helping to identify and quantify key biogeochemical processes. The velocity structure function method can be used to determine time series of <span class="inline-formula"><i>ε</i></span> estimates using along-beam velocity measurements from suitably configured acoustic Doppler current profilers (ADCPs). Shear in the background current can bias such estimates; therefore, standard practice is to deduct the mean or linear trend from the along-beam velocity over the period of an observation burst. This procedure is effective if the orientation of the ADCP to the current remains constant over the burst period. However, if the orientation of the ADCP varies, a proportion of the velocity difference between bins is retained in the structure function and the resulting <span class="inline-formula"><i>ε</i></span> estimates will be biased. Long-term observations from a mooring with three inline ADCPs show the heading oscillating with an angular range that depends on the flow speed: from large, slow oscillations at low flow speeds to smaller, higher-frequency oscillations at higher flow speeds. The mean tilt was also determined by the flow speed, whilst the tilt oscillation range was primarily determined by surface wave height. Synthesised along-beam velocity data for an ADCP subject to sinusoidal oscillation in a sheared flow indicate that the retained proportion of the potential bias is primarily determined by the angular range of the oscillation, with the impact varying between beams depending on the mean heading relative to the flow. Since the heading is typically unconstrained in a tethered mooring, heading oscillation is likely to be the most significant influence on the retained bias for a given level of shear. Use of an instrument housing designed to reduce oscillation would mitigate the impact, whilst if the shear is linear over the observation depth range, the bias can be corrected using a modified structure function method designed to correct for bias due to surface waves.</p>https://os.copernicus.org/articles/18/169/2022/os-18-169-2022.pdf
spellingShingle B. D. Scannell
Y.-D. Lenn
T. P. Rippeth
Impact of acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) motion on structure function estimates of turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate
Ocean Science
title Impact of acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) motion on structure function estimates of turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate
title_full Impact of acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) motion on structure function estimates of turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate
title_fullStr Impact of acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) motion on structure function estimates of turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate
title_full_unstemmed Impact of acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) motion on structure function estimates of turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate
title_short Impact of acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) motion on structure function estimates of turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate
title_sort impact of acoustic doppler current profiler adcp motion on structure function estimates of turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate
url https://os.copernicus.org/articles/18/169/2022/os-18-169-2022.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT bdscannell impactofacousticdopplercurrentprofileradcpmotiononstructurefunctionestimatesofturbulentkineticenergydissipationrate
AT ydlenn impactofacousticdopplercurrentprofileradcpmotiononstructurefunctionestimatesofturbulentkineticenergydissipationrate
AT tprippeth impactofacousticdopplercurrentprofileradcpmotiononstructurefunctionestimatesofturbulentkineticenergydissipationrate