Financial risk of emergency abdominal surgery: a cross sectional study from Ethiopia

Abstract Background The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery suggested six indicators every country should use to measure their surgical systems. One of these indicators, catastrophic expenditure (CE), is defined as money paid for service which amounts to more than 10% of the patient’s total annual e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abraham Genetu, Demmelash Gezahegn, Hana Getachew, Andualem Deneke, Abebe Bekele
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-08-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08480-7
_version_ 1811188946943606784
author Abraham Genetu
Demmelash Gezahegn
Hana Getachew
Andualem Deneke
Abebe Bekele
author_facet Abraham Genetu
Demmelash Gezahegn
Hana Getachew
Andualem Deneke
Abebe Bekele
author_sort Abraham Genetu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery suggested six indicators every country should use to measure their surgical systems. One of these indicators, catastrophic expenditure (CE), is defined as money paid for service which amounts to more than 10% of the patient’s total annual expenditure, or more than 40% of annual non-food household expenditure. Ethiopian Ministry of Health has set a target of 100% protection from CE by 2030. However, so far there is lack of studies that assess financial risk of surgery. Methods Using a cross sectional study design, financial risk assessment was carried out on 142 patients from Yekatit 12 and Zewditu Memorial hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia from May 15 to September 15, 2021. Results Appendectomy (69.0%), emergency laparotomy (26.1%) and cholecystectomy (4.9%) resulted in mean direct medical expenditures of 111.7USD, 200.70USD and 224.60USD, respectively. Medications and imaging accounted for 60.8 and 13.9% of total treatment cost. By applying the two definitions of catastrophic expenditure, 67.6 and 62.7% of patients sustained CE, respectively Overall rates of CE across procedures were 67.3 and 59.1% for appendectomy, 70.2 and 70.2% for laparotomy, 57.0 and 71.2% for cholecystectomy. Thirty-five (24.6%) patients had some form of insurance, with Community Based Health Insurance being the most common form (57%). Insured patients were less likely to sustain CE with both definitions (AOR 0.09, p = 0.002 and AOR 0.10, p = 0.006 respectively). Conclusion and recommendations Substantial proportion of patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery sustain CE in Addis Ababa. Medications and imaging take major share of total cost mainly because patients have to acquire them from private set ups. Policy makers should work on availing medications and imaging in public hospitals as well as expand insurance and other forms of surgical care financing to protect patients from CE.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T14:27:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6f39e6204bf541ec8212844c26eae870
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T14:27:15Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-6f39e6204bf541ec8212844c26eae8702022-12-22T04:18:48ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632022-08-012211910.1186/s12913-022-08480-7Financial risk of emergency abdominal surgery: a cross sectional study from EthiopiaAbraham Genetu0Demmelash Gezahegn1Hana Getachew2Andualem Deneke3Abebe Bekele4College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa UniversityCollege of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa UniversitySt Paul’s Millennium Medical CollegeCollege of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa UniversityCollege of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa UniversityAbstract Background The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery suggested six indicators every country should use to measure their surgical systems. One of these indicators, catastrophic expenditure (CE), is defined as money paid for service which amounts to more than 10% of the patient’s total annual expenditure, or more than 40% of annual non-food household expenditure. Ethiopian Ministry of Health has set a target of 100% protection from CE by 2030. However, so far there is lack of studies that assess financial risk of surgery. Methods Using a cross sectional study design, financial risk assessment was carried out on 142 patients from Yekatit 12 and Zewditu Memorial hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia from May 15 to September 15, 2021. Results Appendectomy (69.0%), emergency laparotomy (26.1%) and cholecystectomy (4.9%) resulted in mean direct medical expenditures of 111.7USD, 200.70USD and 224.60USD, respectively. Medications and imaging accounted for 60.8 and 13.9% of total treatment cost. By applying the two definitions of catastrophic expenditure, 67.6 and 62.7% of patients sustained CE, respectively Overall rates of CE across procedures were 67.3 and 59.1% for appendectomy, 70.2 and 70.2% for laparotomy, 57.0 and 71.2% for cholecystectomy. Thirty-five (24.6%) patients had some form of insurance, with Community Based Health Insurance being the most common form (57%). Insured patients were less likely to sustain CE with both definitions (AOR 0.09, p = 0.002 and AOR 0.10, p = 0.006 respectively). Conclusion and recommendations Substantial proportion of patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery sustain CE in Addis Ababa. Medications and imaging take major share of total cost mainly because patients have to acquire them from private set ups. Policy makers should work on availing medications and imaging in public hospitals as well as expand insurance and other forms of surgical care financing to protect patients from CE.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08480-7Financial riskCatastrophic expenditureCommunity based health insuranceGlobal surgeryAccess to surgery
spellingShingle Abraham Genetu
Demmelash Gezahegn
Hana Getachew
Andualem Deneke
Abebe Bekele
Financial risk of emergency abdominal surgery: a cross sectional study from Ethiopia
BMC Health Services Research
Financial risk
Catastrophic expenditure
Community based health insurance
Global surgery
Access to surgery
title Financial risk of emergency abdominal surgery: a cross sectional study from Ethiopia
title_full Financial risk of emergency abdominal surgery: a cross sectional study from Ethiopia
title_fullStr Financial risk of emergency abdominal surgery: a cross sectional study from Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed Financial risk of emergency abdominal surgery: a cross sectional study from Ethiopia
title_short Financial risk of emergency abdominal surgery: a cross sectional study from Ethiopia
title_sort financial risk of emergency abdominal surgery a cross sectional study from ethiopia
topic Financial risk
Catastrophic expenditure
Community based health insurance
Global surgery
Access to surgery
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08480-7
work_keys_str_mv AT abrahamgenetu financialriskofemergencyabdominalsurgeryacrosssectionalstudyfromethiopia
AT demmelashgezahegn financialriskofemergencyabdominalsurgeryacrosssectionalstudyfromethiopia
AT hanagetachew financialriskofemergencyabdominalsurgeryacrosssectionalstudyfromethiopia
AT andualemdeneke financialriskofemergencyabdominalsurgeryacrosssectionalstudyfromethiopia
AT abebebekele financialriskofemergencyabdominalsurgeryacrosssectionalstudyfromethiopia