Analysis of Network Topologies Underlying Ethylene Growth Response Kinetics

Most models for ethylene signaling involve a linear pathway. However, measurements of seedling growth kinetics when ethylene is applied and removed have resulted in more complex network models that include coherent feedforward, negative feedback, and positive feedback motifs. However, the dynamical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aaron M. Prescott, Forest W. McCollough, Bryan L. Eldreth, Brad M Binder, Steven M Abel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Plant Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpls.2016.01308/full
_version_ 1817997036073517056
author Aaron M. Prescott
Forest W. McCollough
Bryan L. Eldreth
Brad M Binder
Steven M Abel
Steven M Abel
author_facet Aaron M. Prescott
Forest W. McCollough
Bryan L. Eldreth
Brad M Binder
Steven M Abel
Steven M Abel
author_sort Aaron M. Prescott
collection DOAJ
description Most models for ethylene signaling involve a linear pathway. However, measurements of seedling growth kinetics when ethylene is applied and removed have resulted in more complex network models that include coherent feedforward, negative feedback, and positive feedback motifs. However, the dynamical responses of the proposed networks have not been explored in a quantitative manner. Here, we explore (i) whether any of the proposed models are capable of producing growth-response behaviors consistent with experimental observations and (ii) what mechanistic roles various parts of the network topologies play in ethylene signaling. To address this, we used computational methods to explore two general network topologies: The first contains a coherent feedforward loop that inhibits growth and a negative feedback from growth onto itself (CFF/NFB). In the second, ethylene promotes the cleavage of EIN2, with the product of the cleavage inhibiting growth and promoting the production of EIN2 through a positive feedback loop (PFB). Since few network parameters for ethylene signaling are known in detail, we used an evolutionary algorithm to explore sets of parameters that produce behaviors similar to experimental growth response kinetics of both wildtype and mutant seedlings. We generated a library of parameter sets by independently running the evolutionary algorithm many times. Both network topologies produce behavior consistent with experimental observations and analysis of the parameter sets allows us to identify important network interactions and parameter constraints. We additionally screened these parameter sets for growth recovery in the presence of sub-saturating ethylene doses, which is an experimentally-observed property that emerges in some of the evolved parameter sets. Finally, we probed simplified networks maintaining key features of the CFF/NFB and PFB topologies. From this, we verified observations drawn from the larger networks about mechanisms underlying ethylene signaling. Analysis of each network topology results in predictions about changes that occur in network components that can be experimentally tested to give insights into which, if either, network underlies ethylene responses.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T02:31:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6f3ec94fd9a2493cb4f1ed8eb92a40ce
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-462X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T02:31:05Z
publishDate 2016-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Plant Science
spelling doaj.art-6f3ec94fd9a2493cb4f1ed8eb92a40ce2022-12-22T02:17:40ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Plant Science1664-462X2016-08-01710.3389/fpls.2016.01308216158Analysis of Network Topologies Underlying Ethylene Growth Response KineticsAaron M. Prescott0Forest W. McCollough1Bryan L. Eldreth2Brad M Binder3Steven M Abel4Steven M Abel5University of TennesseeUniversity of TennesseeUniversity of TennesseeUniversity of TennesseeUniversity of TennesseeUniversity of TennesseeMost models for ethylene signaling involve a linear pathway. However, measurements of seedling growth kinetics when ethylene is applied and removed have resulted in more complex network models that include coherent feedforward, negative feedback, and positive feedback motifs. However, the dynamical responses of the proposed networks have not been explored in a quantitative manner. Here, we explore (i) whether any of the proposed models are capable of producing growth-response behaviors consistent with experimental observations and (ii) what mechanistic roles various parts of the network topologies play in ethylene signaling. To address this, we used computational methods to explore two general network topologies: The first contains a coherent feedforward loop that inhibits growth and a negative feedback from growth onto itself (CFF/NFB). In the second, ethylene promotes the cleavage of EIN2, with the product of the cleavage inhibiting growth and promoting the production of EIN2 through a positive feedback loop (PFB). Since few network parameters for ethylene signaling are known in detail, we used an evolutionary algorithm to explore sets of parameters that produce behaviors similar to experimental growth response kinetics of both wildtype and mutant seedlings. We generated a library of parameter sets by independently running the evolutionary algorithm many times. Both network topologies produce behavior consistent with experimental observations and analysis of the parameter sets allows us to identify important network interactions and parameter constraints. We additionally screened these parameter sets for growth recovery in the presence of sub-saturating ethylene doses, which is an experimentally-observed property that emerges in some of the evolved parameter sets. Finally, we probed simplified networks maintaining key features of the CFF/NFB and PFB topologies. From this, we verified observations drawn from the larger networks about mechanisms underlying ethylene signaling. Analysis of each network topology results in predictions about changes that occur in network components that can be experimentally tested to give insights into which, if either, network underlies ethylene responses.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpls.2016.01308/fullSignal Transductioncomputational modelingethyleneevolutionary algorithmnetwork topologies
spellingShingle Aaron M. Prescott
Forest W. McCollough
Bryan L. Eldreth
Brad M Binder
Steven M Abel
Steven M Abel
Analysis of Network Topologies Underlying Ethylene Growth Response Kinetics
Frontiers in Plant Science
Signal Transduction
computational modeling
ethylene
evolutionary algorithm
network topologies
title Analysis of Network Topologies Underlying Ethylene Growth Response Kinetics
title_full Analysis of Network Topologies Underlying Ethylene Growth Response Kinetics
title_fullStr Analysis of Network Topologies Underlying Ethylene Growth Response Kinetics
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Network Topologies Underlying Ethylene Growth Response Kinetics
title_short Analysis of Network Topologies Underlying Ethylene Growth Response Kinetics
title_sort analysis of network topologies underlying ethylene growth response kinetics
topic Signal Transduction
computational modeling
ethylene
evolutionary algorithm
network topologies
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpls.2016.01308/full
work_keys_str_mv AT aaronmprescott analysisofnetworktopologiesunderlyingethylenegrowthresponsekinetics
AT forestwmccollough analysisofnetworktopologiesunderlyingethylenegrowthresponsekinetics
AT bryanleldreth analysisofnetworktopologiesunderlyingethylenegrowthresponsekinetics
AT bradmbinder analysisofnetworktopologiesunderlyingethylenegrowthresponsekinetics
AT stevenmabel analysisofnetworktopologiesunderlyingethylenegrowthresponsekinetics
AT stevenmabel analysisofnetworktopologiesunderlyingethylenegrowthresponsekinetics