Comparison of iris-fixated foldable lens and scleral-fixated foldable lens implantation in eyes with insufficient capsular support

AIM: To compare the outcomes of vision using two different intraocular lens (IOL) replacement techniques, iris-fixated foldable intraocular lens (IF-IOL) and scleral-fixated foldable intraocular lens (SF-IOL) in patients with insufficient capsular support. METHODS: Total 63 eyes (62 patients) with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Han Zhang, Jun Zhao, Li-Jun Zhang, Jing Liu, Yuan Liu, Wei Song, Qing-Fen Tian, Qi Wang, David-Rex Hamilton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS) 2016-11-01
Series:International Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijo.cn/en_publish/2016/11/20161111.pdf
_version_ 1818063949987315712
author Han Zhang
Jun Zhao
Li-Jun Zhang
Jing Liu
Yuan Liu
Wei Song
Qing-Fen Tian
Qi Wang
David-Rex Hamilton
author_facet Han Zhang
Jun Zhao
Li-Jun Zhang
Jing Liu
Yuan Liu
Wei Song
Qing-Fen Tian
Qi Wang
David-Rex Hamilton
author_sort Han Zhang
collection DOAJ
description AIM: To compare the outcomes of vision using two different intraocular lens (IOL) replacement techniques, iris-fixated foldable intraocular lens (IF-IOL) and scleral-fixated foldable intraocular lens (SF-IOL) in patients with insufficient capsular support. METHODS: Total 63 eyes (62 patients) with insufficient posterior capsule support underwent replacement of IF-IOL or SF-IOL between January 2008 and August 2011. Outcome measures included changes in visual acuity, slit lamp examination, refractive indices and corneal curvatures. RESULTS: The mean improvement of uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was greater in IF-IOL group compared to the SF-IOL group (0.43 D±0.19 D vs 0.35 D±0.18 D, P<0.05). Moreover, 12 (38.71%) eyes in IF-IOL group and 4 (12.50%) in SF-IOL group had a higher postoperative UCVA than preoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) while 9 (29.03%) eyes in IF-IOL group and 18 (56.25%) in SF-IOL group had a lower postoperative UCVA than preoperative BCVA. The myopic mean manifest sphere and mean cylinder magnitude were lower in the IF-IOL group than that in the SF-IOL group (-0.47 D±0.58 D vs 0.50 D±0.43 D, P<0.01; 0.84 D±0.53 D vs 1.23 D±0.70 D, P<0.05). No difference of corneal astigmatism and surgically induced astigmatism was found between the two groups. In addition, fewer complications were observed in IF-IOL eyes. CONCLUSION: IF-IOL implantation can give a significant improvement in vision with fewer complications than SF-IOL in patients with insufficient capsular support.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T14:28:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6f51de5fe09546409c5ecbacf360df4c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2222-3959
2227-4898
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T14:28:14Z
publishDate 2016-11-01
publisher Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)
record_format Article
series International Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-6f51de5fe09546409c5ecbacf360df4c2022-12-22T01:45:01ZengPress of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)International Journal of Ophthalmology2222-39592227-48982016-11-019111608161310.18240/ijo.2016.11.11Comparison of iris-fixated foldable lens and scleral-fixated foldable lens implantation in eyes with insufficient capsular supportHan Zhang0Jun Zhao1Li-Jun Zhang2Jing Liu3Yuan Liu4Wei Song5Qing-Fen Tian6Qi Wang7David-Rex Hamilton8Department of Ophthalmology, the Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250033, Shandong Province, ChinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, General Hospital of Liaohe Oil Field, Panjin 124010, Liaoning Province, ChinaRefractive Center, Third Hospital Affiliated of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116033, Liaoning Province, ChinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, the Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250033, Shandong Province, ChinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Zibo Kangming Ophthalmology Hospital, Zibo 255025, Shandong Province, ChinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, the Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250033, Shandong Province, ChinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, the Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250033, Shandong Province, ChinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, General Hospital of Liaohe Oil Field, Panjin 124010, Liaoning Province, ChinaUCLA Laser Refractive Center, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USAAIM: To compare the outcomes of vision using two different intraocular lens (IOL) replacement techniques, iris-fixated foldable intraocular lens (IF-IOL) and scleral-fixated foldable intraocular lens (SF-IOL) in patients with insufficient capsular support. METHODS: Total 63 eyes (62 patients) with insufficient posterior capsule support underwent replacement of IF-IOL or SF-IOL between January 2008 and August 2011. Outcome measures included changes in visual acuity, slit lamp examination, refractive indices and corneal curvatures. RESULTS: The mean improvement of uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was greater in IF-IOL group compared to the SF-IOL group (0.43 D±0.19 D vs 0.35 D±0.18 D, P<0.05). Moreover, 12 (38.71%) eyes in IF-IOL group and 4 (12.50%) in SF-IOL group had a higher postoperative UCVA than preoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) while 9 (29.03%) eyes in IF-IOL group and 18 (56.25%) in SF-IOL group had a lower postoperative UCVA than preoperative BCVA. The myopic mean manifest sphere and mean cylinder magnitude were lower in the IF-IOL group than that in the SF-IOL group (-0.47 D±0.58 D vs 0.50 D±0.43 D, P<0.01; 0.84 D±0.53 D vs 1.23 D±0.70 D, P<0.05). No difference of corneal astigmatism and surgically induced astigmatism was found between the two groups. In addition, fewer complications were observed in IF-IOL eyes. CONCLUSION: IF-IOL implantation can give a significant improvement in vision with fewer complications than SF-IOL in patients with insufficient capsular support.http://www.ijo.cn/en_publish/2016/11/20161111.pdfiris-fixated foldable intraocular lensscleral-fixated foldable intraocular lensvisual acuityrefractionrefraction
spellingShingle Han Zhang
Jun Zhao
Li-Jun Zhang
Jing Liu
Yuan Liu
Wei Song
Qing-Fen Tian
Qi Wang
David-Rex Hamilton
Comparison of iris-fixated foldable lens and scleral-fixated foldable lens implantation in eyes with insufficient capsular support
International Journal of Ophthalmology
iris-fixated foldable intraocular lens
scleral-fixated foldable intraocular lens
visual acuity
refraction
refraction
title Comparison of iris-fixated foldable lens and scleral-fixated foldable lens implantation in eyes with insufficient capsular support
title_full Comparison of iris-fixated foldable lens and scleral-fixated foldable lens implantation in eyes with insufficient capsular support
title_fullStr Comparison of iris-fixated foldable lens and scleral-fixated foldable lens implantation in eyes with insufficient capsular support
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of iris-fixated foldable lens and scleral-fixated foldable lens implantation in eyes with insufficient capsular support
title_short Comparison of iris-fixated foldable lens and scleral-fixated foldable lens implantation in eyes with insufficient capsular support
title_sort comparison of iris fixated foldable lens and scleral fixated foldable lens implantation in eyes with insufficient capsular support
topic iris-fixated foldable intraocular lens
scleral-fixated foldable intraocular lens
visual acuity
refraction
refraction
url http://www.ijo.cn/en_publish/2016/11/20161111.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hanzhang comparisonofirisfixatedfoldablelensandscleralfixatedfoldablelensimplantationineyeswithinsufficientcapsularsupport
AT junzhao comparisonofirisfixatedfoldablelensandscleralfixatedfoldablelensimplantationineyeswithinsufficientcapsularsupport
AT lijunzhang comparisonofirisfixatedfoldablelensandscleralfixatedfoldablelensimplantationineyeswithinsufficientcapsularsupport
AT jingliu comparisonofirisfixatedfoldablelensandscleralfixatedfoldablelensimplantationineyeswithinsufficientcapsularsupport
AT yuanliu comparisonofirisfixatedfoldablelensandscleralfixatedfoldablelensimplantationineyeswithinsufficientcapsularsupport
AT weisong comparisonofirisfixatedfoldablelensandscleralfixatedfoldablelensimplantationineyeswithinsufficientcapsularsupport
AT qingfentian comparisonofirisfixatedfoldablelensandscleralfixatedfoldablelensimplantationineyeswithinsufficientcapsularsupport
AT qiwang comparisonofirisfixatedfoldablelensandscleralfixatedfoldablelensimplantationineyeswithinsufficientcapsularsupport
AT davidrexhamilton comparisonofirisfixatedfoldablelensandscleralfixatedfoldablelensimplantationineyeswithinsufficientcapsularsupport