A Study of Modern Eco-Friendly Composite (Geopolymer) Based on Blast Furnace Slag Compared to Conventional Concrete Using the Life Cycle Assessment Approach
By posing the question of what will be the definition of sustainable development in the future, it can almost be seen that the principle of “no waste” and the production of new materials with less of a negative environmental impact will have a high priority. To further develop environmentally friend...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-03-01
|
Series: | Infrastructures |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2412-3811/8/3/58 |
_version_ | 1827749433324863488 |
---|---|
author | Alireza Esparham Nikolai Ivanovich Vatin Makhmud Kharun Mohammad Hematibahar |
author_facet | Alireza Esparham Nikolai Ivanovich Vatin Makhmud Kharun Mohammad Hematibahar |
author_sort | Alireza Esparham |
collection | DOAJ |
description | By posing the question of what will be the definition of sustainable development in the future, it can almost be seen that the principle of “no waste” and the production of new materials with less of a negative environmental impact will have a high priority. To further develop environmentally friendly materials, it is necessary to know about the environmental drivers of new materials as well as to evaluate the environmental effects of conventional materials in construction. According to the definitions of sustainable development and sustainable materials, materials with characteristics such as having low energy consumption, sufficient durability, good physical and chemical properties, while simultaneously reducing pollution should be used. Geopolymer materials may be a reasonable option. In this research, two production processes based on blast furnace slag and ordinary concrete (Portland cement) for one cubic meter of geopolymer concrete have been investigated. To investigate, inputs (materials and energy) and outputs (relevant environmental pollutants) of both systems were determined and a life cycle assessment (LCA) was measured using the Center of Environmental Science of Leiden University (CML) and cumulative exergy demand (CED) quantification methods of SimaPro V.9 software. The results showed that the production system of one cubic meter of conventional concrete has maximum environmental effects in all classes except in the destruction of the ozone layer, and the system of producing one cubic meter of geopolymer concrete based on slag has much less environmental effects than the normal concrete system. It also consumes 62% less directly during its lifetime. As a result, geopolymer concrete may be a suitable alternative to traditional concrete as a sustainable material. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-11T06:24:02Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-6f5880561d474f10ac0adc92f94d8dee |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2412-3811 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-11T06:24:02Z |
publishDate | 2023-03-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Infrastructures |
spelling | doaj.art-6f5880561d474f10ac0adc92f94d8dee2023-11-17T11:44:47ZengMDPI AGInfrastructures2412-38112023-03-01835810.3390/infrastructures8030058A Study of Modern Eco-Friendly Composite (Geopolymer) Based on Blast Furnace Slag Compared to Conventional Concrete Using the Life Cycle Assessment ApproachAlireza Esparham0Nikolai Ivanovich Vatin1Makhmud Kharun2Mohammad Hematibahar3Department of Environmental Engineering, University of Tehran, Karaj 999067, IranInstitute of Civil Engineering, Head of Research Quarter of Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, RussiaDepartment of Reinforced Concrete and Stone Structures, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, 129337 Moscow, RussiaInstitute of Civil Engineering, Head of Research Quarter of Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, RussiaBy posing the question of what will be the definition of sustainable development in the future, it can almost be seen that the principle of “no waste” and the production of new materials with less of a negative environmental impact will have a high priority. To further develop environmentally friendly materials, it is necessary to know about the environmental drivers of new materials as well as to evaluate the environmental effects of conventional materials in construction. According to the definitions of sustainable development and sustainable materials, materials with characteristics such as having low energy consumption, sufficient durability, good physical and chemical properties, while simultaneously reducing pollution should be used. Geopolymer materials may be a reasonable option. In this research, two production processes based on blast furnace slag and ordinary concrete (Portland cement) for one cubic meter of geopolymer concrete have been investigated. To investigate, inputs (materials and energy) and outputs (relevant environmental pollutants) of both systems were determined and a life cycle assessment (LCA) was measured using the Center of Environmental Science of Leiden University (CML) and cumulative exergy demand (CED) quantification methods of SimaPro V.9 software. The results showed that the production system of one cubic meter of conventional concrete has maximum environmental effects in all classes except in the destruction of the ozone layer, and the system of producing one cubic meter of geopolymer concrete based on slag has much less environmental effects than the normal concrete system. It also consumes 62% less directly during its lifetime. As a result, geopolymer concrete may be a suitable alternative to traditional concrete as a sustainable material.https://www.mdpi.com/2412-3811/8/3/58geopolymersustainable developmentlife cycle assessmentgreenhouse gasesenergy consumption |
spellingShingle | Alireza Esparham Nikolai Ivanovich Vatin Makhmud Kharun Mohammad Hematibahar A Study of Modern Eco-Friendly Composite (Geopolymer) Based on Blast Furnace Slag Compared to Conventional Concrete Using the Life Cycle Assessment Approach Infrastructures geopolymer sustainable development life cycle assessment greenhouse gases energy consumption |
title | A Study of Modern Eco-Friendly Composite (Geopolymer) Based on Blast Furnace Slag Compared to Conventional Concrete Using the Life Cycle Assessment Approach |
title_full | A Study of Modern Eco-Friendly Composite (Geopolymer) Based on Blast Furnace Slag Compared to Conventional Concrete Using the Life Cycle Assessment Approach |
title_fullStr | A Study of Modern Eco-Friendly Composite (Geopolymer) Based on Blast Furnace Slag Compared to Conventional Concrete Using the Life Cycle Assessment Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | A Study of Modern Eco-Friendly Composite (Geopolymer) Based on Blast Furnace Slag Compared to Conventional Concrete Using the Life Cycle Assessment Approach |
title_short | A Study of Modern Eco-Friendly Composite (Geopolymer) Based on Blast Furnace Slag Compared to Conventional Concrete Using the Life Cycle Assessment Approach |
title_sort | study of modern eco friendly composite geopolymer based on blast furnace slag compared to conventional concrete using the life cycle assessment approach |
topic | geopolymer sustainable development life cycle assessment greenhouse gases energy consumption |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2412-3811/8/3/58 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alirezaesparham astudyofmodernecofriendlycompositegeopolymerbasedonblastfurnaceslagcomparedtoconventionalconcreteusingthelifecycleassessmentapproach AT nikolaiivanovichvatin astudyofmodernecofriendlycompositegeopolymerbasedonblastfurnaceslagcomparedtoconventionalconcreteusingthelifecycleassessmentapproach AT makhmudkharun astudyofmodernecofriendlycompositegeopolymerbasedonblastfurnaceslagcomparedtoconventionalconcreteusingthelifecycleassessmentapproach AT mohammadhematibahar astudyofmodernecofriendlycompositegeopolymerbasedonblastfurnaceslagcomparedtoconventionalconcreteusingthelifecycleassessmentapproach AT alirezaesparham studyofmodernecofriendlycompositegeopolymerbasedonblastfurnaceslagcomparedtoconventionalconcreteusingthelifecycleassessmentapproach AT nikolaiivanovichvatin studyofmodernecofriendlycompositegeopolymerbasedonblastfurnaceslagcomparedtoconventionalconcreteusingthelifecycleassessmentapproach AT makhmudkharun studyofmodernecofriendlycompositegeopolymerbasedonblastfurnaceslagcomparedtoconventionalconcreteusingthelifecycleassessmentapproach AT mohammadhematibahar studyofmodernecofriendlycompositegeopolymerbasedonblastfurnaceslagcomparedtoconventionalconcreteusingthelifecycleassessmentapproach |