Energy Optimization in Different Production Technologies of Winter Triticale Grain

This article presents the results of a field experiment investigating the energy efficiency of grain produced by a semi-dwarf genotype of winter triticale at different levels of agricultural inputs. The energy efficiency of winter triticale grain production was evaluated in two low-input and two hig...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Władysław Szempliński, Bogdan Dubis, Krzysztof Michał Lachutta, Krzysztof Józef Jankowski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-02-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/4/1003
_version_ 1797396588888326144
author Władysław Szempliński
Bogdan Dubis
Krzysztof Michał Lachutta
Krzysztof Józef Jankowski
author_facet Władysław Szempliński
Bogdan Dubis
Krzysztof Michał Lachutta
Krzysztof Józef Jankowski
author_sort Władysław Szempliński
collection DOAJ
description This article presents the results of a field experiment investigating the energy efficiency of grain produced by a semi-dwarf genotype of winter triticale at different levels of agricultural inputs. The energy efficiency of winter triticale grain production was evaluated in two low-input and two high-input cultivation practices that differed in the rate of nitrogen fertilizer (split application) and disease control. The energy inputs associated with the production of winter triticale grain at low levels of agricultural inputs were determined to be 14.5 to 14.7 GJ ha<sup>−1</sup>. Higher levels of agricultural inputs increased the demand for energy in grain production by 25% on average. The energy output of grain peaked (163.3 GJ ha<sup>−1</sup>) in response to a fertilizer rate of 120 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> applied in a split ratio of 50:50 (BBCH 27/32) and two fungicide treatments (BBCH 31 and 39). The energy output of grain from the remaining cultivation regimes was 3–13% lower. The energy efficiency ratio was highest in the low-input cultivation regime with a nitrogen rate of 90 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> split into two applications (60 and 30 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> for BBCH 27 and 32, respectively), seed dressing with fungicide (thiram and tebuconazole) and one fungicide treatment (azoxystrobin) (BBCH 39).
first_indexed 2024-03-09T00:53:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6f759d0a8780449b9f9c79f8a76b9b6e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T00:53:34Z
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-6f759d0a8780449b9f9c79f8a76b9b6e2023-12-11T17:03:28ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732021-02-01144100310.3390/en14041003Energy Optimization in Different Production Technologies of Winter Triticale GrainWładysław Szempliński0Bogdan Dubis1Krzysztof Michał Lachutta2Krzysztof Józef Jankowski3Department of Agrotechnology and Agribusiness, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719 Olsztyn, PolandDepartment of Agrotechnology and Agribusiness, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719 Olsztyn, PolandDepartment of Agrotechnology and Agribusiness, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719 Olsztyn, PolandDepartment of Agrotechnology and Agribusiness, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719 Olsztyn, PolandThis article presents the results of a field experiment investigating the energy efficiency of grain produced by a semi-dwarf genotype of winter triticale at different levels of agricultural inputs. The energy efficiency of winter triticale grain production was evaluated in two low-input and two high-input cultivation practices that differed in the rate of nitrogen fertilizer (split application) and disease control. The energy inputs associated with the production of winter triticale grain at low levels of agricultural inputs were determined to be 14.5 to 14.7 GJ ha<sup>−1</sup>. Higher levels of agricultural inputs increased the demand for energy in grain production by 25% on average. The energy output of grain peaked (163.3 GJ ha<sup>−1</sup>) in response to a fertilizer rate of 120 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> applied in a split ratio of 50:50 (BBCH 27/32) and two fungicide treatments (BBCH 31 and 39). The energy output of grain from the remaining cultivation regimes was 3–13% lower. The energy efficiency ratio was highest in the low-input cultivation regime with a nitrogen rate of 90 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> split into two applications (60 and 30 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> for BBCH 27 and 32, respectively), seed dressing with fungicide (thiram and tebuconazole) and one fungicide treatment (azoxystrobin) (BBCH 39).https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/4/1003<i>Triticosecale</i>agricultural operationsenergy inputenergy outputenergy gainenergy efficiency ratio
spellingShingle Władysław Szempliński
Bogdan Dubis
Krzysztof Michał Lachutta
Krzysztof Józef Jankowski
Energy Optimization in Different Production Technologies of Winter Triticale Grain
Energies
<i>Triticosecale</i>
agricultural operations
energy input
energy output
energy gain
energy efficiency ratio
title Energy Optimization in Different Production Technologies of Winter Triticale Grain
title_full Energy Optimization in Different Production Technologies of Winter Triticale Grain
title_fullStr Energy Optimization in Different Production Technologies of Winter Triticale Grain
title_full_unstemmed Energy Optimization in Different Production Technologies of Winter Triticale Grain
title_short Energy Optimization in Different Production Technologies of Winter Triticale Grain
title_sort energy optimization in different production technologies of winter triticale grain
topic <i>Triticosecale</i>
agricultural operations
energy input
energy output
energy gain
energy efficiency ratio
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/4/1003
work_keys_str_mv AT władysławszemplinski energyoptimizationindifferentproductiontechnologiesofwintertriticalegrain
AT bogdandubis energyoptimizationindifferentproductiontechnologiesofwintertriticalegrain
AT krzysztofmichałlachutta energyoptimizationindifferentproductiontechnologiesofwintertriticalegrain
AT krzysztofjozefjankowski energyoptimizationindifferentproductiontechnologiesofwintertriticalegrain