Clinical Efficacies of the Minimal Retroperitoneal Approach for Infectious Spondylodiscitis: A Clinical Case Series

Introduction: An anterior surgical approach for severe infectious spondylodiscitis in the lumbar region is optimal but not always atraumatic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a minimal anterior-lateral retroperitoneal approach, also known as a surgical approach for ob...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tsunehiko Konomi, Shinjiro Kaneko, Amir Fariz Zakaria, Kanehiro Fujiyoshi, Junichi Yamane, Takashi Asazuma, Yoshiyuki Yato
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 2021-05-01
Series:Spine Surgery and Related Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/ssrr/5/3/5_2020-0134/_pdf/-char/en
_version_ 1818608226838511616
author Tsunehiko Konomi
Shinjiro Kaneko
Amir Fariz Zakaria
Kanehiro Fujiyoshi
Junichi Yamane
Takashi Asazuma
Yoshiyuki Yato
author_facet Tsunehiko Konomi
Shinjiro Kaneko
Amir Fariz Zakaria
Kanehiro Fujiyoshi
Junichi Yamane
Takashi Asazuma
Yoshiyuki Yato
author_sort Tsunehiko Konomi
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: An anterior surgical approach for severe infectious spondylodiscitis in the lumbar region is optimal but not always atraumatic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a minimal anterior-lateral retroperitoneal approach, also known as a surgical approach for oblique lumbar interbody fusion, for cases with severe infectious spondylodiscitis with osseous defects. Methods: Twenty-four consecutive patients who underwent anterior debridement and spinal fusion with an autologous strut bone graft for infectious spondylodiscitis with osseous defects were reviewed retrospectively. Eleven patients underwent the minimal retroperitoneal approach (Group M), and 13 underwent the conventional open approach (Group C). Peri- and postoperative clinical outcomes, that is, estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time (OT), creatine kinase (CK) level, visual analog scale (VAS), and rates of bone union and additional posterior instrumentation, were evaluated, and the differences between both groups were assessed statistically. Results: Mean EBL, serum CK on the 1st postoperative day, and VAS on the 14th postoperative day were 202.1 mL, 390.9 IU/L, and 9.5 mm in Group M and 648.3 mL, 925.5 IU/L, and 22.3 mm in Group C, respectively, with statistically significant differences between the groups. There were no statistically significant intergroup differences in OT and rates of bone union and additional posterior instrumentation. Conclusions: Anterior debridement and spinal fusion using the minimal retroperitoneal approach is a useful and safe surgical technique. Although a preponderance of the minimal approach regarding early bone union is not validated, this technique has the advantages of conventional open surgery, but reduces blood loss, muscle injury, and pain postoperatively.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T14:39:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6f89d922b9c0436cb268c28a77a91e6f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2432-261X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T14:39:17Z
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research
record_format Article
series Spine Surgery and Related Research
spelling doaj.art-6f89d922b9c0436cb268c28a77a91e6f2022-12-21T22:28:00ZengThe Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related ResearchSpine Surgery and Related Research2432-261X2021-05-015317618110.22603/ssrr.2020-01342020-0134Clinical Efficacies of the Minimal Retroperitoneal Approach for Infectious Spondylodiscitis: A Clinical Case SeriesTsunehiko Konomi0Shinjiro Kaneko1Amir Fariz Zakaria2Kanehiro Fujiyoshi3Junichi Yamane4Takashi Asazuma5Yoshiyuki Yato6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Murayama Medical Center, National Hospital OrganizationDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Murayama Medical Center, National Hospital OrganizationDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Murayama Medical Center, National Hospital OrganizationDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Murayama Medical Center, National Hospital OrganizationDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Murayama Medical Center, National Hospital OrganizationDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Murayama Medical Center, National Hospital OrganizationDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Murayama Medical Center, National Hospital OrganizationIntroduction: An anterior surgical approach for severe infectious spondylodiscitis in the lumbar region is optimal but not always atraumatic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a minimal anterior-lateral retroperitoneal approach, also known as a surgical approach for oblique lumbar interbody fusion, for cases with severe infectious spondylodiscitis with osseous defects. Methods: Twenty-four consecutive patients who underwent anterior debridement and spinal fusion with an autologous strut bone graft for infectious spondylodiscitis with osseous defects were reviewed retrospectively. Eleven patients underwent the minimal retroperitoneal approach (Group M), and 13 underwent the conventional open approach (Group C). Peri- and postoperative clinical outcomes, that is, estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time (OT), creatine kinase (CK) level, visual analog scale (VAS), and rates of bone union and additional posterior instrumentation, were evaluated, and the differences between both groups were assessed statistically. Results: Mean EBL, serum CK on the 1st postoperative day, and VAS on the 14th postoperative day were 202.1 mL, 390.9 IU/L, and 9.5 mm in Group M and 648.3 mL, 925.5 IU/L, and 22.3 mm in Group C, respectively, with statistically significant differences between the groups. There were no statistically significant intergroup differences in OT and rates of bone union and additional posterior instrumentation. Conclusions: Anterior debridement and spinal fusion using the minimal retroperitoneal approach is a useful and safe surgical technique. Although a preponderance of the minimal approach regarding early bone union is not validated, this technique has the advantages of conventional open surgery, but reduces blood loss, muscle injury, and pain postoperatively.https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/ssrr/5/3/5_2020-0134/_pdf/-char/enanterior spinal fusioninfectious spondylodiscitisoblique lumbar interbody fusion
spellingShingle Tsunehiko Konomi
Shinjiro Kaneko
Amir Fariz Zakaria
Kanehiro Fujiyoshi
Junichi Yamane
Takashi Asazuma
Yoshiyuki Yato
Clinical Efficacies of the Minimal Retroperitoneal Approach for Infectious Spondylodiscitis: A Clinical Case Series
Spine Surgery and Related Research
anterior spinal fusion
infectious spondylodiscitis
oblique lumbar interbody fusion
title Clinical Efficacies of the Minimal Retroperitoneal Approach for Infectious Spondylodiscitis: A Clinical Case Series
title_full Clinical Efficacies of the Minimal Retroperitoneal Approach for Infectious Spondylodiscitis: A Clinical Case Series
title_fullStr Clinical Efficacies of the Minimal Retroperitoneal Approach for Infectious Spondylodiscitis: A Clinical Case Series
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Efficacies of the Minimal Retroperitoneal Approach for Infectious Spondylodiscitis: A Clinical Case Series
title_short Clinical Efficacies of the Minimal Retroperitoneal Approach for Infectious Spondylodiscitis: A Clinical Case Series
title_sort clinical efficacies of the minimal retroperitoneal approach for infectious spondylodiscitis a clinical case series
topic anterior spinal fusion
infectious spondylodiscitis
oblique lumbar interbody fusion
url https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/ssrr/5/3/5_2020-0134/_pdf/-char/en
work_keys_str_mv AT tsunehikokonomi clinicalefficaciesoftheminimalretroperitonealapproachforinfectiousspondylodiscitisaclinicalcaseseries
AT shinjirokaneko clinicalefficaciesoftheminimalretroperitonealapproachforinfectiousspondylodiscitisaclinicalcaseseries
AT amirfarizzakaria clinicalefficaciesoftheminimalretroperitonealapproachforinfectiousspondylodiscitisaclinicalcaseseries
AT kanehirofujiyoshi clinicalefficaciesoftheminimalretroperitonealapproachforinfectiousspondylodiscitisaclinicalcaseseries
AT junichiyamane clinicalefficaciesoftheminimalretroperitonealapproachforinfectiousspondylodiscitisaclinicalcaseseries
AT takashiasazuma clinicalefficaciesoftheminimalretroperitonealapproachforinfectiousspondylodiscitisaclinicalcaseseries
AT yoshiyukiyato clinicalefficaciesoftheminimalretroperitonealapproachforinfectiousspondylodiscitisaclinicalcaseseries