Bone mass measurement by DXA should be interpreted with caution in the CKD population with vascular calcification

Background: KDIGO guidelines suggest the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to assess bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with CKD 3a-5D. Previous studies have demonstrated an association between trabecular bone mass loss and coronary artery calcification (CAC) progression. This study...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Layon S. Campagnaro, Aluizio B. Carvalho, Paula M. Pina, Renato Watanabe, Maria Eugênia F. Canziani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-06-01
Series:Bone Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352187222000043
_version_ 1818207609459572736
author Layon S. Campagnaro
Aluizio B. Carvalho
Paula M. Pina
Renato Watanabe
Maria Eugênia F. Canziani
author_facet Layon S. Campagnaro
Aluizio B. Carvalho
Paula M. Pina
Renato Watanabe
Maria Eugênia F. Canziani
author_sort Layon S. Campagnaro
collection DOAJ
description Background: KDIGO guidelines suggest the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to assess bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with CKD 3a-5D. Previous studies have demonstrated an association between trabecular bone mass loss and coronary artery calcification (CAC) progression. This study aimed to prospectively investigate the relationship between BMD changes, quantified by DXA, and CAC progression in the non-dialyzed CKD population. Methods: In this post hoc study, BMD by DXA was measured at the lumbar spine and total hip at baseline and 12-months. Patients were categorized according to BMD changes into 3 different groups: LOSS, UNCHANGED and GAIN. CAC quantification was obtained by multislice computed tomography at baseline and 12-months. Results: 87 patients (55.6 ± 10.7 years, 62% males, 30% diabetic, eGFR = 39.2 ± 18.1 mL/min/1.73m2) were enrolled. CAC was found in 41 (47%) of the patients at baseline and CAC progression in 25 (64%) of them. Considering the lumbar spine and total hip BMD changes together, 24%, 48%, and 25% of the patients were in the LOSS, UNCHANGED and GAIN groups, respectively. Compared to the UNCHANGED or LOSS groups, the GAIN group had an increase in calcium score (p = 0.04) and a higher proportion of patients with CAC progression (p = 0.01). In the logistic regression analysis, CAC progression was 4.5 times more likely to be in the GAIN group. Conclusions: The association between the increase in BMD values and the progression of vascular calcification was the result of two concomitant processes overlapping, leading to a misinterpretation of DXA results. Thus, the use of DXA for the evaluation of bone mass, especially at the lumbar spine, must be applied with restraint and its results very carefully interpreted in CKD patients.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T04:31:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6f8bc4eeb79640a9a150eeb26aee2869
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-1872
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T04:31:39Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Bone Reports
spelling doaj.art-6f8bc4eeb79640a9a150eeb26aee28692022-12-22T00:38:04ZengElsevierBone Reports2352-18722022-06-0116101169Bone mass measurement by DXA should be interpreted with caution in the CKD population with vascular calcificationLayon S. Campagnaro0Aluizio B. Carvalho1Paula M. Pina2Renato Watanabe3Maria Eugênia F. Canziani4Nephrology Division of Federal University of São Paulo, Rua Pedro de Toledo, 299 - Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP 04039-000, BrazilNephrology Division of Federal University of São Paulo, Rua Pedro de Toledo, 299 - Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP 04039-000, BrazilNephrology Division of Federal University of São Paulo, Rua Pedro de Toledo, 299 - Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP 04039-000, BrazilNephrology Division of Federal University of São Paulo, Rua Pedro de Toledo, 299 - Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP 04039-000, BrazilCorresponding author at: Rua Pedro de Toledo 299, São Paulo, SP CEP 04039-000, Brazil.; Nephrology Division of Federal University of São Paulo, Rua Pedro de Toledo, 299 - Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP 04039-000, BrazilBackground: KDIGO guidelines suggest the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to assess bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with CKD 3a-5D. Previous studies have demonstrated an association between trabecular bone mass loss and coronary artery calcification (CAC) progression. This study aimed to prospectively investigate the relationship between BMD changes, quantified by DXA, and CAC progression in the non-dialyzed CKD population. Methods: In this post hoc study, BMD by DXA was measured at the lumbar spine and total hip at baseline and 12-months. Patients were categorized according to BMD changes into 3 different groups: LOSS, UNCHANGED and GAIN. CAC quantification was obtained by multislice computed tomography at baseline and 12-months. Results: 87 patients (55.6 ± 10.7 years, 62% males, 30% diabetic, eGFR = 39.2 ± 18.1 mL/min/1.73m2) were enrolled. CAC was found in 41 (47%) of the patients at baseline and CAC progression in 25 (64%) of them. Considering the lumbar spine and total hip BMD changes together, 24%, 48%, and 25% of the patients were in the LOSS, UNCHANGED and GAIN groups, respectively. Compared to the UNCHANGED or LOSS groups, the GAIN group had an increase in calcium score (p = 0.04) and a higher proportion of patients with CAC progression (p = 0.01). In the logistic regression analysis, CAC progression was 4.5 times more likely to be in the GAIN group. Conclusions: The association between the increase in BMD values and the progression of vascular calcification was the result of two concomitant processes overlapping, leading to a misinterpretation of DXA results. Thus, the use of DXA for the evaluation of bone mass, especially at the lumbar spine, must be applied with restraint and its results very carefully interpreted in CKD patients.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352187222000043Bone mineral densityDXA scanVascular calcificationCKD-BMD
spellingShingle Layon S. Campagnaro
Aluizio B. Carvalho
Paula M. Pina
Renato Watanabe
Maria Eugênia F. Canziani
Bone mass measurement by DXA should be interpreted with caution in the CKD population with vascular calcification
Bone Reports
Bone mineral density
DXA scan
Vascular calcification
CKD-BMD
title Bone mass measurement by DXA should be interpreted with caution in the CKD population with vascular calcification
title_full Bone mass measurement by DXA should be interpreted with caution in the CKD population with vascular calcification
title_fullStr Bone mass measurement by DXA should be interpreted with caution in the CKD population with vascular calcification
title_full_unstemmed Bone mass measurement by DXA should be interpreted with caution in the CKD population with vascular calcification
title_short Bone mass measurement by DXA should be interpreted with caution in the CKD population with vascular calcification
title_sort bone mass measurement by dxa should be interpreted with caution in the ckd population with vascular calcification
topic Bone mineral density
DXA scan
Vascular calcification
CKD-BMD
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352187222000043
work_keys_str_mv AT layonscampagnaro bonemassmeasurementbydxashouldbeinterpretedwithcautionintheckdpopulationwithvascularcalcification
AT aluiziobcarvalho bonemassmeasurementbydxashouldbeinterpretedwithcautionintheckdpopulationwithvascularcalcification
AT paulampina bonemassmeasurementbydxashouldbeinterpretedwithcautionintheckdpopulationwithvascularcalcification
AT renatowatanabe bonemassmeasurementbydxashouldbeinterpretedwithcautionintheckdpopulationwithvascularcalcification
AT mariaeugeniafcanziani bonemassmeasurementbydxashouldbeinterpretedwithcautionintheckdpopulationwithvascularcalcification