A cross-sectional audit of informed consent of online survey: Characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines
Background: Research on human participants requires formal approval from a competent ethics committee. During the recruitment of the research participants, obtaining informed consent is a prerequisite. The online survey method is used by many researchers as it can collect the data from a diverse pop...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2023-01-01
|
Series: | Perspectives in Clinical Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.picronline.org/article.asp?issn=2229-3485;year=2023;volume=14;issue=3;spage=123;epage=129;aulast=Mondal |
_version_ | 1827861759320391680 |
---|---|
author | Himel Mondal Shaikat Mondal Sachin Soni |
author_facet | Himel Mondal Shaikat Mondal Sachin Soni |
author_sort | Himel Mondal |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background: Research on human participants requires formal approval from a competent ethics committee. During the recruitment of the research participants, obtaining informed consent is a prerequisite. The online survey method is used by many researchers as it can collect the data from a diverse population in a short time.
Aim: This study aimed to observe the characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines (set by the Indian Council of Medical Research [ICMR]) of informed consent coupled with online surveys.
Methods: We collected the informed consent text from online survey links obtained from a network of colleagues who got a request to participate in a survey. Data were collected from July 2020 to June 2022. The text was anonymized for further analysis. The word count, sentences, and Flesch reading ease score were calculated. The adherence to ICMR guidelines where checked by two authors individually and a consensus was reached to prepare the final result.
Results: A total of 44 online surveys in English were audited and among them, 10 did not have informed consent. The informed consent in 34 surveys had a median of 6 sentences and 84 words. The median reading ease score was 45.7 (college level). The majority of the consent states the purpose of the research (91.18%), the voluntary nature of the participation (85.29%), and mentioned that it is research (64.71%). However, the rest of the components are ignored by the majority of the survey consent form.
Conclusion: Informed consent form with online surveys lacks adherence to the components suggested by ICMR. Hence, the forms should be made carefully by the researchers so that the vigor of informed consent is maintained in the online surveys. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T13:44:06Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-6f8d535e57d1470ea6b2c8e76972e0a8 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2229-3485 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T13:44:06Z |
publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | Perspectives in Clinical Research |
spelling | doaj.art-6f8d535e57d1470ea6b2c8e76972e0a82023-08-23T09:47:08ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsPerspectives in Clinical Research2229-34852023-01-0114312312910.4103/picr.picr_175_22A cross-sectional audit of informed consent of online survey: Characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelinesHimel MondalShaikat MondalSachin SoniBackground: Research on human participants requires formal approval from a competent ethics committee. During the recruitment of the research participants, obtaining informed consent is a prerequisite. The online survey method is used by many researchers as it can collect the data from a diverse population in a short time. Aim: This study aimed to observe the characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines (set by the Indian Council of Medical Research [ICMR]) of informed consent coupled with online surveys. Methods: We collected the informed consent text from online survey links obtained from a network of colleagues who got a request to participate in a survey. Data were collected from July 2020 to June 2022. The text was anonymized for further analysis. The word count, sentences, and Flesch reading ease score were calculated. The adherence to ICMR guidelines where checked by two authors individually and a consensus was reached to prepare the final result. Results: A total of 44 online surveys in English were audited and among them, 10 did not have informed consent. The informed consent in 34 surveys had a median of 6 sentences and 84 words. The median reading ease score was 45.7 (college level). The majority of the consent states the purpose of the research (91.18%), the voluntary nature of the participation (85.29%), and mentioned that it is research (64.71%). However, the rest of the components are ignored by the majority of the survey consent form. Conclusion: Informed consent form with online surveys lacks adherence to the components suggested by ICMR. Hence, the forms should be made carefully by the researchers so that the vigor of informed consent is maintained in the online surveys.http://www.picronline.org/article.asp?issn=2229-3485;year=2023;volume=14;issue=3;spage=123;epage=129;aulast=Mondalbiomedical researchconsent formsethics committeesinformed consentsurveys and questionnaires |
spellingShingle | Himel Mondal Shaikat Mondal Sachin Soni A cross-sectional audit of informed consent of online survey: Characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines Perspectives in Clinical Research biomedical research consent forms ethics committees informed consent surveys and questionnaires |
title | A cross-sectional audit of informed consent of online survey: Characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines |
title_full | A cross-sectional audit of informed consent of online survey: Characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines |
title_fullStr | A cross-sectional audit of informed consent of online survey: Characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed | A cross-sectional audit of informed consent of online survey: Characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines |
title_short | A cross-sectional audit of informed consent of online survey: Characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines |
title_sort | cross sectional audit of informed consent of online survey characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines |
topic | biomedical research consent forms ethics committees informed consent surveys and questionnaires |
url | http://www.picronline.org/article.asp?issn=2229-3485;year=2023;volume=14;issue=3;spage=123;epage=129;aulast=Mondal |
work_keys_str_mv | AT himelmondal acrosssectionalauditofinformedconsentofonlinesurveycharacteristicsandadherencetoprevalentguidelines AT shaikatmondal acrosssectionalauditofinformedconsentofonlinesurveycharacteristicsandadherencetoprevalentguidelines AT sachinsoni acrosssectionalauditofinformedconsentofonlinesurveycharacteristicsandadherencetoprevalentguidelines AT himelmondal crosssectionalauditofinformedconsentofonlinesurveycharacteristicsandadherencetoprevalentguidelines AT shaikatmondal crosssectionalauditofinformedconsentofonlinesurveycharacteristicsandadherencetoprevalentguidelines AT sachinsoni crosssectionalauditofinformedconsentofonlinesurveycharacteristicsandadherencetoprevalentguidelines |