A cross-sectional audit of informed consent of online survey: Characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines

Background: Research on human participants requires formal approval from a competent ethics committee. During the recruitment of the research participants, obtaining informed consent is a prerequisite. The online survey method is used by many researchers as it can collect the data from a diverse pop...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Himel Mondal, Shaikat Mondal, Sachin Soni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2023-01-01
Series:Perspectives in Clinical Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.picronline.org/article.asp?issn=2229-3485;year=2023;volume=14;issue=3;spage=123;epage=129;aulast=Mondal
_version_ 1827861759320391680
author Himel Mondal
Shaikat Mondal
Sachin Soni
author_facet Himel Mondal
Shaikat Mondal
Sachin Soni
author_sort Himel Mondal
collection DOAJ
description Background: Research on human participants requires formal approval from a competent ethics committee. During the recruitment of the research participants, obtaining informed consent is a prerequisite. The online survey method is used by many researchers as it can collect the data from a diverse population in a short time. Aim: This study aimed to observe the characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines (set by the Indian Council of Medical Research [ICMR]) of informed consent coupled with online surveys. Methods: We collected the informed consent text from online survey links obtained from a network of colleagues who got a request to participate in a survey. Data were collected from July 2020 to June 2022. The text was anonymized for further analysis. The word count, sentences, and Flesch reading ease score were calculated. The adherence to ICMR guidelines where checked by two authors individually and a consensus was reached to prepare the final result. Results: A total of 44 online surveys in English were audited and among them, 10 did not have informed consent. The informed consent in 34 surveys had a median of 6 sentences and 84 words. The median reading ease score was 45.7 (college level). The majority of the consent states the purpose of the research (91.18%), the voluntary nature of the participation (85.29%), and mentioned that it is research (64.71%). However, the rest of the components are ignored by the majority of the survey consent form. Conclusion: Informed consent form with online surveys lacks adherence to the components suggested by ICMR. Hence, the forms should be made carefully by the researchers so that the vigor of informed consent is maintained in the online surveys.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T13:44:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6f8d535e57d1470ea6b2c8e76972e0a8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2229-3485
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T13:44:06Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Perspectives in Clinical Research
spelling doaj.art-6f8d535e57d1470ea6b2c8e76972e0a82023-08-23T09:47:08ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsPerspectives in Clinical Research2229-34852023-01-0114312312910.4103/picr.picr_175_22A cross-sectional audit of informed consent of online survey: Characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelinesHimel MondalShaikat MondalSachin SoniBackground: Research on human participants requires formal approval from a competent ethics committee. During the recruitment of the research participants, obtaining informed consent is a prerequisite. The online survey method is used by many researchers as it can collect the data from a diverse population in a short time. Aim: This study aimed to observe the characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines (set by the Indian Council of Medical Research [ICMR]) of informed consent coupled with online surveys. Methods: We collected the informed consent text from online survey links obtained from a network of colleagues who got a request to participate in a survey. Data were collected from July 2020 to June 2022. The text was anonymized for further analysis. The word count, sentences, and Flesch reading ease score were calculated. The adherence to ICMR guidelines where checked by two authors individually and a consensus was reached to prepare the final result. Results: A total of 44 online surveys in English were audited and among them, 10 did not have informed consent. The informed consent in 34 surveys had a median of 6 sentences and 84 words. The median reading ease score was 45.7 (college level). The majority of the consent states the purpose of the research (91.18%), the voluntary nature of the participation (85.29%), and mentioned that it is research (64.71%). However, the rest of the components are ignored by the majority of the survey consent form. Conclusion: Informed consent form with online surveys lacks adherence to the components suggested by ICMR. Hence, the forms should be made carefully by the researchers so that the vigor of informed consent is maintained in the online surveys.http://www.picronline.org/article.asp?issn=2229-3485;year=2023;volume=14;issue=3;spage=123;epage=129;aulast=Mondalbiomedical researchconsent formsethics committeesinformed consentsurveys and questionnaires
spellingShingle Himel Mondal
Shaikat Mondal
Sachin Soni
A cross-sectional audit of informed consent of online survey: Characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines
Perspectives in Clinical Research
biomedical research
consent forms
ethics committees
informed consent
surveys and questionnaires
title A cross-sectional audit of informed consent of online survey: Characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines
title_full A cross-sectional audit of informed consent of online survey: Characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines
title_fullStr A cross-sectional audit of informed consent of online survey: Characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines
title_full_unstemmed A cross-sectional audit of informed consent of online survey: Characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines
title_short A cross-sectional audit of informed consent of online survey: Characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines
title_sort cross sectional audit of informed consent of online survey characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines
topic biomedical research
consent forms
ethics committees
informed consent
surveys and questionnaires
url http://www.picronline.org/article.asp?issn=2229-3485;year=2023;volume=14;issue=3;spage=123;epage=129;aulast=Mondal
work_keys_str_mv AT himelmondal acrosssectionalauditofinformedconsentofonlinesurveycharacteristicsandadherencetoprevalentguidelines
AT shaikatmondal acrosssectionalauditofinformedconsentofonlinesurveycharacteristicsandadherencetoprevalentguidelines
AT sachinsoni acrosssectionalauditofinformedconsentofonlinesurveycharacteristicsandadherencetoprevalentguidelines
AT himelmondal crosssectionalauditofinformedconsentofonlinesurveycharacteristicsandadherencetoprevalentguidelines
AT shaikatmondal crosssectionalauditofinformedconsentofonlinesurveycharacteristicsandadherencetoprevalentguidelines
AT sachinsoni crosssectionalauditofinformedconsentofonlinesurveycharacteristicsandadherencetoprevalentguidelines