A study to evaluate and compare intubating laryngeal mask airway and air-Q intubating laryngeal airway for intubation using Parker Flex Tip tube
Background and Aims: Though manufacturer recommendations suggest use of specific endotracheal tube (ETT) with intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) and air-Q intubating laryngeal airway (ILA), Parker Flex Tip tube introduced by J D Parker has certain advantages and is also cost-effective. This stu...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Indian Journal of Anaesthesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2020;volume=64;issue=2;spage=97;epage=102;aulast=Bansal |
_version_ | 1819011660902301696 |
---|---|
author | Teena Bansal Suresh Singhal Himani Mittal |
author_facet | Teena Bansal Suresh Singhal Himani Mittal |
author_sort | Teena Bansal |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background and Aims: Though manufacturer recommendations suggest use of specific endotracheal tube (ETT) with intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) and air-Q intubating laryngeal airway (ILA), Parker Flex Tip tube introduced by J D Parker has certain advantages and is also cost-effective. This study was conducted to compare ILMA and air-Q ILA for intubation using Parker Flex Tip tube. Methods: Patients of either gender, aged 18–60 years, scheduled for elective surgery requiring endotracheal intubation were included in this study. In group A (n = 55), blind intubation was done through ILMA using Parker Flex Tip tube and in group B (n = 55), blind intubation was done through air-Q ILA using Parker Flex Tip tube. Success rate, number of attempts, ease and a total time of intubation were recorded. Results: Intubation was successful in 54 patients (98.2%) in group A and in 46 patients (85.2%) in group B (P = 0.026). Intubation was significantly easy with ILMA (P = 0.048). Manoeuvres for intubation were used in 10.9% patients in group A while it was used in 27.8% patients in group B. Significantly, more manoeuvres were required with air-Q ILA for intubation (P = 0.026). Number of attempts for ETT placement (P = 0.092), insertion time of ETT (TT) (P = 0.472) and total time taken for successful intubation (P = 0.526) were comparable in both the groups. Conclusion: The intubating laryngeal mask airway was superior to the air-Q intubating laryngeal airway for blind intubation using Parker Flex Tip tube. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-21T01:31:42Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-6f95044cdcf44a688f99f58960bd02a6 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0019-5049 0976-2817 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-21T01:31:42Z |
publishDate | 2020-01-01 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | Indian Journal of Anaesthesia |
spelling | doaj.art-6f95044cdcf44a688f99f58960bd02a62022-12-21T19:20:22ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Anaesthesia0019-50490976-28172020-01-016429710210.4103/ija.IJA_584_19A study to evaluate and compare intubating laryngeal mask airway and air-Q intubating laryngeal airway for intubation using Parker Flex Tip tubeTeena BansalSuresh SinghalHimani MittalBackground and Aims: Though manufacturer recommendations suggest use of specific endotracheal tube (ETT) with intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) and air-Q intubating laryngeal airway (ILA), Parker Flex Tip tube introduced by J D Parker has certain advantages and is also cost-effective. This study was conducted to compare ILMA and air-Q ILA for intubation using Parker Flex Tip tube. Methods: Patients of either gender, aged 18–60 years, scheduled for elective surgery requiring endotracheal intubation were included in this study. In group A (n = 55), blind intubation was done through ILMA using Parker Flex Tip tube and in group B (n = 55), blind intubation was done through air-Q ILA using Parker Flex Tip tube. Success rate, number of attempts, ease and a total time of intubation were recorded. Results: Intubation was successful in 54 patients (98.2%) in group A and in 46 patients (85.2%) in group B (P = 0.026). Intubation was significantly easy with ILMA (P = 0.048). Manoeuvres for intubation were used in 10.9% patients in group A while it was used in 27.8% patients in group B. Significantly, more manoeuvres were required with air-Q ILA for intubation (P = 0.026). Number of attempts for ETT placement (P = 0.092), insertion time of ETT (TT) (P = 0.472) and total time taken for successful intubation (P = 0.526) were comparable in both the groups. Conclusion: The intubating laryngeal mask airway was superior to the air-Q intubating laryngeal airway for blind intubation using Parker Flex Tip tube.http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2020;volume=64;issue=2;spage=97;epage=102;aulast=Bansalair-q intubating laryngeal airwayintubating laryngeal mask airwayintubationparker flex tip tube |
spellingShingle | Teena Bansal Suresh Singhal Himani Mittal A study to evaluate and compare intubating laryngeal mask airway and air-Q intubating laryngeal airway for intubation using Parker Flex Tip tube Indian Journal of Anaesthesia air-q intubating laryngeal airway intubating laryngeal mask airway intubation parker flex tip tube |
title | A study to evaluate and compare intubating laryngeal mask airway and air-Q intubating laryngeal airway for intubation using Parker Flex Tip tube |
title_full | A study to evaluate and compare intubating laryngeal mask airway and air-Q intubating laryngeal airway for intubation using Parker Flex Tip tube |
title_fullStr | A study to evaluate and compare intubating laryngeal mask airway and air-Q intubating laryngeal airway for intubation using Parker Flex Tip tube |
title_full_unstemmed | A study to evaluate and compare intubating laryngeal mask airway and air-Q intubating laryngeal airway for intubation using Parker Flex Tip tube |
title_short | A study to evaluate and compare intubating laryngeal mask airway and air-Q intubating laryngeal airway for intubation using Parker Flex Tip tube |
title_sort | study to evaluate and compare intubating laryngeal mask airway and air q intubating laryngeal airway for intubation using parker flex tip tube |
topic | air-q intubating laryngeal airway intubating laryngeal mask airway intubation parker flex tip tube |
url | http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2020;volume=64;issue=2;spage=97;epage=102;aulast=Bansal |
work_keys_str_mv | AT teenabansal astudytoevaluateandcompareintubatinglaryngealmaskairwayandairqintubatinglaryngealairwayforintubationusingparkerflextiptube AT sureshsinghal astudytoevaluateandcompareintubatinglaryngealmaskairwayandairqintubatinglaryngealairwayforintubationusingparkerflextiptube AT himanimittal astudytoevaluateandcompareintubatinglaryngealmaskairwayandairqintubatinglaryngealairwayforintubationusingparkerflextiptube AT teenabansal studytoevaluateandcompareintubatinglaryngealmaskairwayandairqintubatinglaryngealairwayforintubationusingparkerflextiptube AT sureshsinghal studytoevaluateandcompareintubatinglaryngealmaskairwayandairqintubatinglaryngealairwayforintubationusingparkerflextiptube AT himanimittal studytoevaluateandcompareintubatinglaryngealmaskairwayandairqintubatinglaryngealairwayforintubationusingparkerflextiptube |