A study to evaluate and compare intubating laryngeal mask airway and air-Q intubating laryngeal airway for intubation using Parker Flex Tip tube

Background and Aims: Though manufacturer recommendations suggest use of specific endotracheal tube (ETT) with intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) and air-Q intubating laryngeal airway (ILA), Parker Flex Tip tube introduced by J D Parker has certain advantages and is also cost-effective. This stu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Teena Bansal, Suresh Singhal, Himani Mittal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2020;volume=64;issue=2;spage=97;epage=102;aulast=Bansal
_version_ 1819011660902301696
author Teena Bansal
Suresh Singhal
Himani Mittal
author_facet Teena Bansal
Suresh Singhal
Himani Mittal
author_sort Teena Bansal
collection DOAJ
description Background and Aims: Though manufacturer recommendations suggest use of specific endotracheal tube (ETT) with intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) and air-Q intubating laryngeal airway (ILA), Parker Flex Tip tube introduced by J D Parker has certain advantages and is also cost-effective. This study was conducted to compare ILMA and air-Q ILA for intubation using Parker Flex Tip tube. Methods: Patients of either gender, aged 18–60 years, scheduled for elective surgery requiring endotracheal intubation were included in this study. In group A (n = 55), blind intubation was done through ILMA using Parker Flex Tip tube and in group B (n = 55), blind intubation was done through air-Q ILA using Parker Flex Tip tube. Success rate, number of attempts, ease and a total time of intubation were recorded. Results: Intubation was successful in 54 patients (98.2%) in group A and in 46 patients (85.2%) in group B (P = 0.026). Intubation was significantly easy with ILMA (P = 0.048). Manoeuvres for intubation were used in 10.9% patients in group A while it was used in 27.8% patients in group B. Significantly, more manoeuvres were required with air-Q ILA for intubation (P = 0.026). Number of attempts for ETT placement (P = 0.092), insertion time of ETT (TT) (P = 0.472) and total time taken for successful intubation (P = 0.526) were comparable in both the groups. Conclusion: The intubating laryngeal mask airway was superior to the air-Q intubating laryngeal airway for blind intubation using Parker Flex Tip tube.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T01:31:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6f95044cdcf44a688f99f58960bd02a6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0019-5049
0976-2817
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T01:31:42Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
spelling doaj.art-6f95044cdcf44a688f99f58960bd02a62022-12-21T19:20:22ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Anaesthesia0019-50490976-28172020-01-016429710210.4103/ija.IJA_584_19A study to evaluate and compare intubating laryngeal mask airway and air-Q intubating laryngeal airway for intubation using Parker Flex Tip tubeTeena BansalSuresh SinghalHimani MittalBackground and Aims: Though manufacturer recommendations suggest use of specific endotracheal tube (ETT) with intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) and air-Q intubating laryngeal airway (ILA), Parker Flex Tip tube introduced by J D Parker has certain advantages and is also cost-effective. This study was conducted to compare ILMA and air-Q ILA for intubation using Parker Flex Tip tube. Methods: Patients of either gender, aged 18–60 years, scheduled for elective surgery requiring endotracheal intubation were included in this study. In group A (n = 55), blind intubation was done through ILMA using Parker Flex Tip tube and in group B (n = 55), blind intubation was done through air-Q ILA using Parker Flex Tip tube. Success rate, number of attempts, ease and a total time of intubation were recorded. Results: Intubation was successful in 54 patients (98.2%) in group A and in 46 patients (85.2%) in group B (P = 0.026). Intubation was significantly easy with ILMA (P = 0.048). Manoeuvres for intubation were used in 10.9% patients in group A while it was used in 27.8% patients in group B. Significantly, more manoeuvres were required with air-Q ILA for intubation (P = 0.026). Number of attempts for ETT placement (P = 0.092), insertion time of ETT (TT) (P = 0.472) and total time taken for successful intubation (P = 0.526) were comparable in both the groups. Conclusion: The intubating laryngeal mask airway was superior to the air-Q intubating laryngeal airway for blind intubation using Parker Flex Tip tube.http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2020;volume=64;issue=2;spage=97;epage=102;aulast=Bansalair-q intubating laryngeal airwayintubating laryngeal mask airwayintubationparker flex tip tube
spellingShingle Teena Bansal
Suresh Singhal
Himani Mittal
A study to evaluate and compare intubating laryngeal mask airway and air-Q intubating laryngeal airway for intubation using Parker Flex Tip tube
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
air-q intubating laryngeal airway
intubating laryngeal mask airway
intubation
parker flex tip tube
title A study to evaluate and compare intubating laryngeal mask airway and air-Q intubating laryngeal airway for intubation using Parker Flex Tip tube
title_full A study to evaluate and compare intubating laryngeal mask airway and air-Q intubating laryngeal airway for intubation using Parker Flex Tip tube
title_fullStr A study to evaluate and compare intubating laryngeal mask airway and air-Q intubating laryngeal airway for intubation using Parker Flex Tip tube
title_full_unstemmed A study to evaluate and compare intubating laryngeal mask airway and air-Q intubating laryngeal airway for intubation using Parker Flex Tip tube
title_short A study to evaluate and compare intubating laryngeal mask airway and air-Q intubating laryngeal airway for intubation using Parker Flex Tip tube
title_sort study to evaluate and compare intubating laryngeal mask airway and air q intubating laryngeal airway for intubation using parker flex tip tube
topic air-q intubating laryngeal airway
intubating laryngeal mask airway
intubation
parker flex tip tube
url http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2020;volume=64;issue=2;spage=97;epage=102;aulast=Bansal
work_keys_str_mv AT teenabansal astudytoevaluateandcompareintubatinglaryngealmaskairwayandairqintubatinglaryngealairwayforintubationusingparkerflextiptube
AT sureshsinghal astudytoevaluateandcompareintubatinglaryngealmaskairwayandairqintubatinglaryngealairwayforintubationusingparkerflextiptube
AT himanimittal astudytoevaluateandcompareintubatinglaryngealmaskairwayandairqintubatinglaryngealairwayforintubationusingparkerflextiptube
AT teenabansal studytoevaluateandcompareintubatinglaryngealmaskairwayandairqintubatinglaryngealairwayforintubationusingparkerflextiptube
AT sureshsinghal studytoevaluateandcompareintubatinglaryngealmaskairwayandairqintubatinglaryngealairwayforintubationusingparkerflextiptube
AT himanimittal studytoevaluateandcompareintubatinglaryngealmaskairwayandairqintubatinglaryngealairwayforintubationusingparkerflextiptube