Patient Journey Map: Metal Hypersensitivity

In this study, we highlight patients’ experiences with metal hypersensitivity (MH) after receiving implantable medical devices (IMDs). We aim to identify gaps in clinical care and improve outcomes for individuals who have or may be sensitive to metals. Secondary data analysis from a previous interpr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Adrienne Lagura RN, MN-NP (candidate), Dzifa Dordunoo RN, PhD, Anastasia Mallidou RN, PhD, Jett Carey BScN, Elizabeth M. Borycki RN, PhD, Andre Kushniruk BSc, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2023-06-01
Series:Journal of Patient Experience
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735231183576
_version_ 1827920856591892480
author J. Adrienne Lagura RN, MN-NP (candidate)
Dzifa Dordunoo RN, PhD
Anastasia Mallidou RN, PhD
Jett Carey BScN
Elizabeth M. Borycki RN, PhD
Andre Kushniruk BSc, PhD
author_facet J. Adrienne Lagura RN, MN-NP (candidate)
Dzifa Dordunoo RN, PhD
Anastasia Mallidou RN, PhD
Jett Carey BScN
Elizabeth M. Borycki RN, PhD
Andre Kushniruk BSc, PhD
author_sort J. Adrienne Lagura RN, MN-NP (candidate)
collection DOAJ
description In this study, we highlight patients’ experiences with metal hypersensitivity (MH) after receiving implantable medical devices (IMDs). We aim to identify gaps in clinical care and improve outcomes for individuals who have or may be sensitive to metals. Secondary data analysis from a previous interpretative phenomenological qualitative study was utilized. Using patient journey maps, we explored the experiences of 8 individuals from outpatient settings who received IMD and have first-hand experience with MH. We documented their journey from MH symptom recognition to diagnosis and subsequent IMD management. The results reveal that the time frames from device implantation to the treatment of MH varied from 17 to 228 months. The longest phase on the patient journey maps was the symptom recognition phase, which refers to the time between symptom emergence and MH diagnosis. Participants also required extensive healthcare utilization following their initial surgery. These findings emphasize that MH should be considered in differential diagnoses for patients with IMD. Early screening and detection of MH can enhance patient safety, alleviate distress, and reduce unnecessary healthcare utilization.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T04:17:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6fabd0d86e8f4bc0ade13a7a7e9c5f3c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2374-3743
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T04:17:44Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of Patient Experience
spelling doaj.art-6fabd0d86e8f4bc0ade13a7a7e9c5f3c2023-06-20T18:34:30ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Patient Experience2374-37432023-06-011010.1177/23743735231183576Patient Journey Map: Metal HypersensitivityJ. Adrienne Lagura RN, MN-NP (candidate)0Dzifa Dordunoo RN, PhD1Anastasia Mallidou RN, PhD2Jett Carey BScN3Elizabeth M. Borycki RN, PhD4Andre Kushniruk BSc, PhD5 School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada , Victoria, BC, Canada School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, CanadaIn this study, we highlight patients’ experiences with metal hypersensitivity (MH) after receiving implantable medical devices (IMDs). We aim to identify gaps in clinical care and improve outcomes for individuals who have or may be sensitive to metals. Secondary data analysis from a previous interpretative phenomenological qualitative study was utilized. Using patient journey maps, we explored the experiences of 8 individuals from outpatient settings who received IMD and have first-hand experience with MH. We documented their journey from MH symptom recognition to diagnosis and subsequent IMD management. The results reveal that the time frames from device implantation to the treatment of MH varied from 17 to 228 months. The longest phase on the patient journey maps was the symptom recognition phase, which refers to the time between symptom emergence and MH diagnosis. Participants also required extensive healthcare utilization following their initial surgery. These findings emphasize that MH should be considered in differential diagnoses for patients with IMD. Early screening and detection of MH can enhance patient safety, alleviate distress, and reduce unnecessary healthcare utilization.https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735231183576
spellingShingle J. Adrienne Lagura RN, MN-NP (candidate)
Dzifa Dordunoo RN, PhD
Anastasia Mallidou RN, PhD
Jett Carey BScN
Elizabeth M. Borycki RN, PhD
Andre Kushniruk BSc, PhD
Patient Journey Map: Metal Hypersensitivity
Journal of Patient Experience
title Patient Journey Map: Metal Hypersensitivity
title_full Patient Journey Map: Metal Hypersensitivity
title_fullStr Patient Journey Map: Metal Hypersensitivity
title_full_unstemmed Patient Journey Map: Metal Hypersensitivity
title_short Patient Journey Map: Metal Hypersensitivity
title_sort patient journey map metal hypersensitivity
url https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735231183576
work_keys_str_mv AT jadriennelagurarnmnnpcandidate patientjourneymapmetalhypersensitivity
AT dzifadordunoornphd patientjourneymapmetalhypersensitivity
AT anastasiamallidournphd patientjourneymapmetalhypersensitivity
AT jettcareybscn patientjourneymapmetalhypersensitivity
AT elizabethmboryckirnphd patientjourneymapmetalhypersensitivity
AT andrekushnirukbscphd patientjourneymapmetalhypersensitivity