Improved accuracy and less fault prediction errors via modified sequential minimal optimization algorithm

The benefits and opportunities offered by cloud computing are among the fastest-growing technologies in the computer industry. Additionally, it addresses the difficulties and issues that make more users more likely to accept and use the technology. The proposed research comprised of machine learning...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muhammad Asim Shahid, Muhammad Mansoor Alam, Mazliham Mohd Su’ud
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2023-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10101450/?tool=EBI
_version_ 1797846160769024000
author Muhammad Asim Shahid
Muhammad Mansoor Alam
Mazliham Mohd Su’ud
author_facet Muhammad Asim Shahid
Muhammad Mansoor Alam
Mazliham Mohd Su’ud
author_sort Muhammad Asim Shahid
collection DOAJ
description The benefits and opportunities offered by cloud computing are among the fastest-growing technologies in the computer industry. Additionally, it addresses the difficulties and issues that make more users more likely to accept and use the technology. The proposed research comprised of machine learning (ML) algorithms is Naïve Bayes (NB), Library Support Vector Machine (LibSVM), Multinomial Logistic Regression (MLR), Sequential Minimal Optimization (SMO), K Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Random Forest (RF) to compare the classifier gives better results in accuracy and less fault prediction. In this research, the secondary data results (CPU-Mem Mono) give the highest percentage of accuracy and less fault prediction on the NB classifier in terms of 80/20 (77.01%), 70/30 (76.05%), and 5 folds cross-validation (74.88%), and (CPU-Mem Multi) in terms of 80/20 (89.72%), 70/30 (90.28%), and 5 folds cross-validation (92.83%). Furthermore, on (HDD Mono) the SMO classifier gives the highest percentage of accuracy and less fault prediction fault in terms of 80/20 (87.72%), 70/30 (89.41%), and 5 folds cross-validation (88.38%), and (HDD-Multi) in terms of 80/20 (93.64%), 70/30 (90.91%), and 5 folds cross-validation (88.20%). Whereas, primary data results found RF classifier gives the highest percentage of accuracy and less fault prediction in terms of 80/20 (97.14%), 70/30 (96.19%), and 5 folds cross-validation (95.85%) in the primary data results, but the algorithm complexity (0.17 seconds) is not good. In terms of 80/20 (95.71%), 70/30 (95.71%), and 5 folds cross-validation (95.71%), SMO has the second highest accuracy and less fault prediction, but the algorithm complexity is good (0.3 seconds). The difference in accuracy and less fault prediction between RF and SMO is only (.13%), and the difference in time complexity is (14 seconds). We have decided that we will modify SMO. Finally, the Modified Sequential Minimal Optimization (MSMO) Algorithm method has been proposed to get the highest accuracy & less fault prediction errors in terms of 80/20 (96.42%), 70/30 (96.42%), & 5 fold cross validation (96.50%).
first_indexed 2024-04-09T17:51:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6fc6b4fc74e64c28a0387d40f05bfe4c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T17:51:29Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-6fc6b4fc74e64c28a0387d40f05bfe4c2023-04-16T05:31:37ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-01184Improved accuracy and less fault prediction errors via modified sequential minimal optimization algorithmMuhammad Asim ShahidMuhammad Mansoor AlamMazliham Mohd Su’udThe benefits and opportunities offered by cloud computing are among the fastest-growing technologies in the computer industry. Additionally, it addresses the difficulties and issues that make more users more likely to accept and use the technology. The proposed research comprised of machine learning (ML) algorithms is Naïve Bayes (NB), Library Support Vector Machine (LibSVM), Multinomial Logistic Regression (MLR), Sequential Minimal Optimization (SMO), K Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Random Forest (RF) to compare the classifier gives better results in accuracy and less fault prediction. In this research, the secondary data results (CPU-Mem Mono) give the highest percentage of accuracy and less fault prediction on the NB classifier in terms of 80/20 (77.01%), 70/30 (76.05%), and 5 folds cross-validation (74.88%), and (CPU-Mem Multi) in terms of 80/20 (89.72%), 70/30 (90.28%), and 5 folds cross-validation (92.83%). Furthermore, on (HDD Mono) the SMO classifier gives the highest percentage of accuracy and less fault prediction fault in terms of 80/20 (87.72%), 70/30 (89.41%), and 5 folds cross-validation (88.38%), and (HDD-Multi) in terms of 80/20 (93.64%), 70/30 (90.91%), and 5 folds cross-validation (88.20%). Whereas, primary data results found RF classifier gives the highest percentage of accuracy and less fault prediction in terms of 80/20 (97.14%), 70/30 (96.19%), and 5 folds cross-validation (95.85%) in the primary data results, but the algorithm complexity (0.17 seconds) is not good. In terms of 80/20 (95.71%), 70/30 (95.71%), and 5 folds cross-validation (95.71%), SMO has the second highest accuracy and less fault prediction, but the algorithm complexity is good (0.3 seconds). The difference in accuracy and less fault prediction between RF and SMO is only (.13%), and the difference in time complexity is (14 seconds). We have decided that we will modify SMO. Finally, the Modified Sequential Minimal Optimization (MSMO) Algorithm method has been proposed to get the highest accuracy & less fault prediction errors in terms of 80/20 (96.42%), 70/30 (96.42%), & 5 fold cross validation (96.50%).https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10101450/?tool=EBI
spellingShingle Muhammad Asim Shahid
Muhammad Mansoor Alam
Mazliham Mohd Su’ud
Improved accuracy and less fault prediction errors via modified sequential minimal optimization algorithm
PLoS ONE
title Improved accuracy and less fault prediction errors via modified sequential minimal optimization algorithm
title_full Improved accuracy and less fault prediction errors via modified sequential minimal optimization algorithm
title_fullStr Improved accuracy and less fault prediction errors via modified sequential minimal optimization algorithm
title_full_unstemmed Improved accuracy and less fault prediction errors via modified sequential minimal optimization algorithm
title_short Improved accuracy and less fault prediction errors via modified sequential minimal optimization algorithm
title_sort improved accuracy and less fault prediction errors via modified sequential minimal optimization algorithm
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10101450/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT muhammadasimshahid improvedaccuracyandlessfaultpredictionerrorsviamodifiedsequentialminimaloptimizationalgorithm
AT muhammadmansooralam improvedaccuracyandlessfaultpredictionerrorsviamodifiedsequentialminimaloptimizationalgorithm
AT mazlihammohdsuud improvedaccuracyandlessfaultpredictionerrorsviamodifiedsequentialminimaloptimizationalgorithm