Wound integrity of modified anterior stromal hydration Vs. conventional hydration after clear corneal incision phacoemulsification

Purpose: To compare the self-sealing ability of temporal clear corneal incisions for phacoemulsification using conventional stromal hydration (CH) with two modified methods: the anterior stromal pocket hydration (ASPH) and the modified stromal pocket hydration (MASH). Methods: Patients undergoing ro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Isha Lohmror, Pankaj Sharma, Sonal Kalia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2021;volume=69;issue=7;spage=1769;epage=1774;aulast=Lohmror
_version_ 1818726249580724224
author Isha Lohmror
Pankaj Sharma
Sonal Kalia
author_facet Isha Lohmror
Pankaj Sharma
Sonal Kalia
author_sort Isha Lohmror
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: To compare the self-sealing ability of temporal clear corneal incisions for phacoemulsification using conventional stromal hydration (CH) with two modified methods: the anterior stromal pocket hydration (ASPH) and the modified stromal pocket hydration (MASH). Methods: Patients undergoing routine phacoemulsification surgeries were randomized to receive the CH, ASPH, and MASH (n = 30 eyes in each group). In the ASPH, an anterior stromal pocket was created superficial and parallel while in the MASH; it was superficial and perpendicular to the plane of the main incision. The primary outcome measure was wound leakage assessed after applying firm downward pressure on the posterior lip of the main corneal incision, simulating eye rubbing. Results: On application of pressure to the posterior lip, leakage was seen from 19 eyes (63%) in the CH group, while this was seen in only two eyes (7%) each in the ASPH and MASH groups (P < 0.001). The likelihood of wound leak after applying pressure to the posterior lip reduced by 86% in the ASPH and MASH groups compared to CH (Odds ratio = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.05 – 0.35, P < 0.001). The mean surgically induced astigmatism was 0.18 ± 0.14D and there were no differences in SIA across the three groups (P = 0.42). More eyes in the ASPH required conversion to CH (n = 4, 13%) due to difficulty in localizing the pocket compared to MASH (n = 0, P = 0.03) Conclusion: Both, the ASPH and MASH techniques reduce the risk of wound leakage and do not induce astigmatism. The MASH technique makes it easier to consistently localize the pocket.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T21:55:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6fd02702e9db407d8d3feaa11523a484
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0301-4738
1998-3689
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T21:55:12Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-6fd02702e9db407d8d3feaa11523a4842022-12-21T21:31:09ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Ophthalmology0301-47381998-36892021-01-016971769177410.4103/ijo.IJO_3239_20Wound integrity of modified anterior stromal hydration Vs. conventional hydration after clear corneal incision phacoemulsificationIsha LohmrorPankaj SharmaSonal KaliaPurpose: To compare the self-sealing ability of temporal clear corneal incisions for phacoemulsification using conventional stromal hydration (CH) with two modified methods: the anterior stromal pocket hydration (ASPH) and the modified stromal pocket hydration (MASH). Methods: Patients undergoing routine phacoemulsification surgeries were randomized to receive the CH, ASPH, and MASH (n = 30 eyes in each group). In the ASPH, an anterior stromal pocket was created superficial and parallel while in the MASH; it was superficial and perpendicular to the plane of the main incision. The primary outcome measure was wound leakage assessed after applying firm downward pressure on the posterior lip of the main corneal incision, simulating eye rubbing. Results: On application of pressure to the posterior lip, leakage was seen from 19 eyes (63%) in the CH group, while this was seen in only two eyes (7%) each in the ASPH and MASH groups (P < 0.001). The likelihood of wound leak after applying pressure to the posterior lip reduced by 86% in the ASPH and MASH groups compared to CH (Odds ratio = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.05 – 0.35, P < 0.001). The mean surgically induced astigmatism was 0.18 ± 0.14D and there were no differences in SIA across the three groups (P = 0.42). More eyes in the ASPH required conversion to CH (n = 4, 13%) due to difficulty in localizing the pocket compared to MASH (n = 0, P = 0.03) Conclusion: Both, the ASPH and MASH techniques reduce the risk of wound leakage and do not induce astigmatism. The MASH technique makes it easier to consistently localize the pocket.http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2021;volume=69;issue=7;spage=1769;epage=1774;aulast=Lohmrorphacoemulsificationwound hydrationstromal pocketclear corneal incision
spellingShingle Isha Lohmror
Pankaj Sharma
Sonal Kalia
Wound integrity of modified anterior stromal hydration Vs. conventional hydration after clear corneal incision phacoemulsification
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
phacoemulsification
wound hydration
stromal pocket
clear corneal incision
title Wound integrity of modified anterior stromal hydration Vs. conventional hydration after clear corneal incision phacoemulsification
title_full Wound integrity of modified anterior stromal hydration Vs. conventional hydration after clear corneal incision phacoemulsification
title_fullStr Wound integrity of modified anterior stromal hydration Vs. conventional hydration after clear corneal incision phacoemulsification
title_full_unstemmed Wound integrity of modified anterior stromal hydration Vs. conventional hydration after clear corneal incision phacoemulsification
title_short Wound integrity of modified anterior stromal hydration Vs. conventional hydration after clear corneal incision phacoemulsification
title_sort wound integrity of modified anterior stromal hydration vs conventional hydration after clear corneal incision phacoemulsification
topic phacoemulsification
wound hydration
stromal pocket
clear corneal incision
url http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2021;volume=69;issue=7;spage=1769;epage=1774;aulast=Lohmror
work_keys_str_mv AT ishalohmror woundintegrityofmodifiedanteriorstromalhydrationvsconventionalhydrationafterclearcornealincisionphacoemulsification
AT pankajsharma woundintegrityofmodifiedanteriorstromalhydrationvsconventionalhydrationafterclearcornealincisionphacoemulsification
AT sonalkalia woundintegrityofmodifiedanteriorstromalhydrationvsconventionalhydrationafterclearcornealincisionphacoemulsification