The Demographics of Deception: What Motivates Authors Who Engage in Misconduct?
We hypothesized that scientific misconduct (data fabrication or falsification) is goal-directed behavior. This hypothesis predicts that papers retracted for misconduct: are targeted to journals with a high impact factor (IF); are written by authors with additional papers withdrawn for misconduct; di...
Main Author: | R. Grant Steen |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2014-03-01
|
Series: | Publications |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/2/2/44 |
Similar Items
-
Scientific misconduct
by: Todorović Slobodan, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Research Misconduct—Definitions, Manifestations and Extent
by: Lutz Bornmann
Published: (2013-10-01) -
Research Misconduct: The Peril of Publish or Perish
by: Samir Al-Adawi, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Scientific publications of affiliated authors in Italy retracted due to fraud. Review and analysis
by: Gonzalo Marco-Cuenca, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01) -
Publication ethics and misconducts
by: Anurag Sachan, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)