Cost of integrating assisted partner services in HIV testing services in Kisumu and Homa Bay counties, Kenya: a microcosting study

Abstract Background HIV assisted partner services (aPS), or provider notification and testing for sexual and injecting partners of people diagnosed with HIV, is shown to be safe, effective, and cost-effective and was scaled up within the national HIV testing services (HTS) program in Kenya in 2016....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beatrice Wamuti, Monisha Sharma, Edward Kariithi, Harison Lagat, George Otieno, Rose Bosire, Sarah Masyuko, Mary Mugambi, Bryan J. Weiner, David A. Katz, Carey Farquhar, Carol Levin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-01-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07479-4
_version_ 1819006751945523200
author Beatrice Wamuti
Monisha Sharma
Edward Kariithi
Harison Lagat
George Otieno
Rose Bosire
Sarah Masyuko
Mary Mugambi
Bryan J. Weiner
David A. Katz
Carey Farquhar
Carol Levin
author_facet Beatrice Wamuti
Monisha Sharma
Edward Kariithi
Harison Lagat
George Otieno
Rose Bosire
Sarah Masyuko
Mary Mugambi
Bryan J. Weiner
David A. Katz
Carey Farquhar
Carol Levin
author_sort Beatrice Wamuti
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background HIV assisted partner services (aPS), or provider notification and testing for sexual and injecting partners of people diagnosed with HIV, is shown to be safe, effective, and cost-effective and was scaled up within the national HIV testing services (HTS) program in Kenya in 2016. We estimated the costs of integrating aPS into routine HTS within an ongoing aPS scale-up project in western Kenya. Methods We conducted microcosting using the payer perspective in 14 facilities offering aPS. Although aPS was offered to both males and females testing HIV-positive (index clients), we only collected data on female index clients and their male sex partners (MSP). We used activity-based costing to identify key aPS activities, inputs, resources, and estimated financial and economic costs of goods and services. We analyzed costs by start-up (August 2018), and recurrent costs one-year after aPS implementation (Kisumu: August 2019; Homa Bay: January 2020) and conducted time-and-motion observations of aPS activities. We estimated the incremental costs of aPS, average cost per MSP traced, tested, testing HIV-positive, and on antiretroviral therapy, cost shares, and costs disaggregated by facility. Results Overall, the number of MSPs traced, tested, testing HIV-positive, and on antiretroviral therapy was 1027, 869, 370, and 272 respectively. Average unit costs per MSP traced, tested, testing HIV-positive, and on antiretroviral therapy were $34.54, $42.50, $108.71 and $152.28, respectively, which varied by county and facility client volume. The weighted average incremental cost of integrating aPS was $7,485.97 per facility per year, with recurrent costs accounting for approximately 90% of costs. The largest cost drivers were personnel (49%) and transport (13%). Providers spent approximately 25% of the HTS visit obtaining MSP contact information (HIV-negative clients: 13 out of 54 min; HIV-positive clients: 20 out of 96 min), while the median time spent per MSP traced on phone and in-person was 6 min and 2.5 hours, respectively. Conclusion Average facility costs will increase when integrating aPS to HTS with incremental costs largely driven by personnel and transport. Strategies to efficiently utilize healthcare personnel will be critical for effective, affordable, and sustainable aPS.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T00:13:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6ff3d5560e3a4a278a9a0b67212bec9b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6963
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T00:13:40Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Health Services Research
spelling doaj.art-6ff3d5560e3a4a278a9a0b67212bec9b2022-12-21T19:22:18ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632022-01-0122111110.1186/s12913-022-07479-4Cost of integrating assisted partner services in HIV testing services in Kisumu and Homa Bay counties, Kenya: a microcosting studyBeatrice Wamuti0Monisha Sharma1Edward Kariithi2Harison Lagat3George Otieno4Rose Bosire5Sarah Masyuko6Mary Mugambi7Bryan J. Weiner8David A. Katz9Carey Farquhar10Carol Levin11Department of Global Health, University of WashingtonDepartment of Global Health, University of WashingtonPATH- KenyaPATH- KenyaPATH- KenyaKenya Medical Research InstituteDepartment of Global Health, University of WashingtonMinistry of HealthDepartment of Global Health, University of WashingtonDepartment of Global Health, University of WashingtonDepartment of Global Health, University of WashingtonDepartment of Global Health, University of WashingtonAbstract Background HIV assisted partner services (aPS), or provider notification and testing for sexual and injecting partners of people diagnosed with HIV, is shown to be safe, effective, and cost-effective and was scaled up within the national HIV testing services (HTS) program in Kenya in 2016. We estimated the costs of integrating aPS into routine HTS within an ongoing aPS scale-up project in western Kenya. Methods We conducted microcosting using the payer perspective in 14 facilities offering aPS. Although aPS was offered to both males and females testing HIV-positive (index clients), we only collected data on female index clients and their male sex partners (MSP). We used activity-based costing to identify key aPS activities, inputs, resources, and estimated financial and economic costs of goods and services. We analyzed costs by start-up (August 2018), and recurrent costs one-year after aPS implementation (Kisumu: August 2019; Homa Bay: January 2020) and conducted time-and-motion observations of aPS activities. We estimated the incremental costs of aPS, average cost per MSP traced, tested, testing HIV-positive, and on antiretroviral therapy, cost shares, and costs disaggregated by facility. Results Overall, the number of MSPs traced, tested, testing HIV-positive, and on antiretroviral therapy was 1027, 869, 370, and 272 respectively. Average unit costs per MSP traced, tested, testing HIV-positive, and on antiretroviral therapy were $34.54, $42.50, $108.71 and $152.28, respectively, which varied by county and facility client volume. The weighted average incremental cost of integrating aPS was $7,485.97 per facility per year, with recurrent costs accounting for approximately 90% of costs. The largest cost drivers were personnel (49%) and transport (13%). Providers spent approximately 25% of the HTS visit obtaining MSP contact information (HIV-negative clients: 13 out of 54 min; HIV-positive clients: 20 out of 96 min), while the median time spent per MSP traced on phone and in-person was 6 min and 2.5 hours, respectively. Conclusion Average facility costs will increase when integrating aPS to HTS with incremental costs largely driven by personnel and transport. Strategies to efficiently utilize healthcare personnel will be critical for effective, affordable, and sustainable aPS.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07479-4CostIntegrationHIVAssisted partner servicesKenyaMicrocosting
spellingShingle Beatrice Wamuti
Monisha Sharma
Edward Kariithi
Harison Lagat
George Otieno
Rose Bosire
Sarah Masyuko
Mary Mugambi
Bryan J. Weiner
David A. Katz
Carey Farquhar
Carol Levin
Cost of integrating assisted partner services in HIV testing services in Kisumu and Homa Bay counties, Kenya: a microcosting study
BMC Health Services Research
Cost
Integration
HIV
Assisted partner services
Kenya
Microcosting
title Cost of integrating assisted partner services in HIV testing services in Kisumu and Homa Bay counties, Kenya: a microcosting study
title_full Cost of integrating assisted partner services in HIV testing services in Kisumu and Homa Bay counties, Kenya: a microcosting study
title_fullStr Cost of integrating assisted partner services in HIV testing services in Kisumu and Homa Bay counties, Kenya: a microcosting study
title_full_unstemmed Cost of integrating assisted partner services in HIV testing services in Kisumu and Homa Bay counties, Kenya: a microcosting study
title_short Cost of integrating assisted partner services in HIV testing services in Kisumu and Homa Bay counties, Kenya: a microcosting study
title_sort cost of integrating assisted partner services in hiv testing services in kisumu and homa bay counties kenya a microcosting study
topic Cost
Integration
HIV
Assisted partner services
Kenya
Microcosting
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07479-4
work_keys_str_mv AT beatricewamuti costofintegratingassistedpartnerservicesinhivtestingservicesinkisumuandhomabaycountieskenyaamicrocostingstudy
AT monishasharma costofintegratingassistedpartnerservicesinhivtestingservicesinkisumuandhomabaycountieskenyaamicrocostingstudy
AT edwardkariithi costofintegratingassistedpartnerservicesinhivtestingservicesinkisumuandhomabaycountieskenyaamicrocostingstudy
AT harisonlagat costofintegratingassistedpartnerservicesinhivtestingservicesinkisumuandhomabaycountieskenyaamicrocostingstudy
AT georgeotieno costofintegratingassistedpartnerservicesinhivtestingservicesinkisumuandhomabaycountieskenyaamicrocostingstudy
AT rosebosire costofintegratingassistedpartnerservicesinhivtestingservicesinkisumuandhomabaycountieskenyaamicrocostingstudy
AT sarahmasyuko costofintegratingassistedpartnerservicesinhivtestingservicesinkisumuandhomabaycountieskenyaamicrocostingstudy
AT marymugambi costofintegratingassistedpartnerservicesinhivtestingservicesinkisumuandhomabaycountieskenyaamicrocostingstudy
AT bryanjweiner costofintegratingassistedpartnerservicesinhivtestingservicesinkisumuandhomabaycountieskenyaamicrocostingstudy
AT davidakatz costofintegratingassistedpartnerservicesinhivtestingservicesinkisumuandhomabaycountieskenyaamicrocostingstudy
AT careyfarquhar costofintegratingassistedpartnerservicesinhivtestingservicesinkisumuandhomabaycountieskenyaamicrocostingstudy
AT carollevin costofintegratingassistedpartnerservicesinhivtestingservicesinkisumuandhomabaycountieskenyaamicrocostingstudy