Interpréter Aristote par Aristote
Several conceptual schemes generally used by historians of hermeneutics can be challenged if one takes into consideration the history of philosophical traditions, which should not be neglected by those interested in reconstructing the development of hermeneutical notions and methods. Focusing on the...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Université de Lille
2004-04-01
|
| Series: | Methodos |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/98 |
| _version_ | 1831805292026789888 |
|---|---|
| author | Luca Bianchi |
| author_facet | Luca Bianchi |
| author_sort | Luca Bianchi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Several conceptual schemes generally used by historians of hermeneutics can be challenged if one takes into consideration the history of philosophical traditions, which should not be neglected by those interested in reconstructing the development of hermeneutical notions and methods. Focusing on the Aristotelian tradition, this article aims at showing : 1) that between the Middle Ages and the Renaissance the meaning of the Latin term interpretatio shifted significantly ; 2) that the humanists’ approach to the Aristotelian corpus is based on the principle that every author is the best interpreter of himself ; 3) that this principle was formulated and discussed in some neglected treatises dealing with the optima ratio interpretandi Aristotelem, published by Nuñez in 1554, by Pascual in 1591, and by Piccart in 1605. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-22T19:21:22Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-700e64f444b745309ac11035017869a7 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1769-7379 |
| language | fra |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-22T19:21:22Z |
| publishDate | 2004-04-01 |
| publisher | Université de Lille |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Methodos |
| spelling | doaj.art-700e64f444b745309ac11035017869a72022-12-21T18:15:21ZfraUniversité de LilleMethodos1769-73792004-04-01210.4000/methodos.98Interpréter Aristote par AristoteLuca BianchiSeveral conceptual schemes generally used by historians of hermeneutics can be challenged if one takes into consideration the history of philosophical traditions, which should not be neglected by those interested in reconstructing the development of hermeneutical notions and methods. Focusing on the Aristotelian tradition, this article aims at showing : 1) that between the Middle Ages and the Renaissance the meaning of the Latin term interpretatio shifted significantly ; 2) that the humanists’ approach to the Aristotelian corpus is based on the principle that every author is the best interpreter of himself ; 3) that this principle was formulated and discussed in some neglected treatises dealing with the optima ratio interpretandi Aristotelem, published by Nuñez in 1554, by Pascual in 1591, and by Piccart in 1605.http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/98aristotelianshistory of hermeneuticsAristotleinterpretationRenaissanceDescartes |
| spellingShingle | Luca Bianchi Interpréter Aristote par Aristote Methodos aristotelians history of hermeneutics Aristotle interpretation Renaissance Descartes |
| title | Interpréter Aristote par Aristote |
| title_full | Interpréter Aristote par Aristote |
| title_fullStr | Interpréter Aristote par Aristote |
| title_full_unstemmed | Interpréter Aristote par Aristote |
| title_short | Interpréter Aristote par Aristote |
| title_sort | interpreter aristote par aristote |
| topic | aristotelians history of hermeneutics Aristotle interpretation Renaissance Descartes |
| url | http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/98 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lucabianchi interpreteraristotepararistote |