Evidence for implementation of interventions to promote mental health in the workplace: a systematic scoping review protocol
Abstract Background Mental health problems are common in the working population and represent a growing concern internationally, with potential impacts on workers, organisations, workplace health and compensation authorities, labour markets and social policies. Workplace interventions that create wo...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2021-01-01
|
| Series: | Systematic Reviews |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01570-9 |
| _version_ | 1819330908776300544 |
|---|---|
| author | Charlotte Paterson Caleb Leduc Margaret Maxwell Birgit Aust Benedikt L. Amann Arlinda Cerga-Pashoja Evelien Coppens Chrisje Couwenbergh Cliodhna O’Connor Ella Arensman Birgit A. Greiner |
| author_facet | Charlotte Paterson Caleb Leduc Margaret Maxwell Birgit Aust Benedikt L. Amann Arlinda Cerga-Pashoja Evelien Coppens Chrisje Couwenbergh Cliodhna O’Connor Ella Arensman Birgit A. Greiner |
| author_sort | Charlotte Paterson |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Mental health problems are common in the working population and represent a growing concern internationally, with potential impacts on workers, organisations, workplace health and compensation authorities, labour markets and social policies. Workplace interventions that create workplaces supportive of mental health, promote mental health awareness, destigmatise mental illness and support those with mental disorders are likely to improve health and economical outcomes for employees and organisations. Identifying factors associated with successful implementation of these interventions can improve intervention quality and evaluation, and facilitate the uptake and expansion. Therefore, we aim to review research reporting on the implementation of mental health promotion interventions delivered in workplace settings, in order to increase understanding of factors influencing successful delivery. Methods and analysis A scoping review will be conducted incorporating a stepwise methodology to identify relevant literature reviews, primary research and grey literature. This review is registered with Research Registry (reviewregistry897). One reviewer will conduct the search to identify English language studies in the following electronic databases from 2008 through to July 1, 2020: Scopus, PROSPERO, Health Technology Assessments, PubMed, Campbell Collaboration, Joanna Briggs Library, PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL and Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH). Reference searching, Google Scholar, Grey Matters, IOSH and expert contacts will be used to identify grey literature. Two reviewers will screen title and abstracts, aiming for 95% agreement, and then independently screen full texts for inclusion. Two reviewers will assess methodological quality of included studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and extract and synthesize data in line with the RE-AIM framework, Nielson and Randall’s model of organisational-level interventions and Moore’s sustainability criteria, if the data allows. We will recruit and consult with international experts in the field to ensure engagement, reach and relevance of the main findings. Discussion This will be the first systematic scoping review to identify and synthesise evidence of barriers and facilitators to implementing mental health promotion interventions in workplace settings. Our results will inform future evaluation studies and randomised controlled trials and highlight gaps in the evidence base. Systematic review registration Research Registry ( reviewregistry897 ) |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-24T14:06:00Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-70100e5c88eb4ab2973b1cb2655afa43 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2046-4053 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-24T14:06:00Z |
| publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Systematic Reviews |
| spelling | doaj.art-70100e5c88eb4ab2973b1cb2655afa432022-12-21T16:52:21ZengBMCSystematic Reviews2046-40532021-01-011011810.1186/s13643-020-01570-9Evidence for implementation of interventions to promote mental health in the workplace: a systematic scoping review protocolCharlotte Paterson0Caleb Leduc1Margaret Maxwell2Birgit Aust3Benedikt L. Amann4Arlinda Cerga-Pashoja5Evelien Coppens6Chrisje Couwenbergh7Cliodhna O’Connor8Ella Arensman9Birgit A. Greiner10NMAHP-RU, University of StirlingSchool of Public Health, University College CorkNMAHP-RU, University of StirlingNational Research Centre for the Working EnvironmentCentro Forum Research Unit, Institut de Neuropsiquiatria i Addicions (INAD), Parc de Salut Mar, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Autonomous University Barcelona, CIBERSAMLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineCentre for Health Research and Consultancy, Katholieke Universiteit LeuvenKenniscentrum PhrenosSchool of Public Health, University College CorkSchool of Public Health, University College CorkSchool of Public Health, University College CorkAbstract Background Mental health problems are common in the working population and represent a growing concern internationally, with potential impacts on workers, organisations, workplace health and compensation authorities, labour markets and social policies. Workplace interventions that create workplaces supportive of mental health, promote mental health awareness, destigmatise mental illness and support those with mental disorders are likely to improve health and economical outcomes for employees and organisations. Identifying factors associated with successful implementation of these interventions can improve intervention quality and evaluation, and facilitate the uptake and expansion. Therefore, we aim to review research reporting on the implementation of mental health promotion interventions delivered in workplace settings, in order to increase understanding of factors influencing successful delivery. Methods and analysis A scoping review will be conducted incorporating a stepwise methodology to identify relevant literature reviews, primary research and grey literature. This review is registered with Research Registry (reviewregistry897). One reviewer will conduct the search to identify English language studies in the following electronic databases from 2008 through to July 1, 2020: Scopus, PROSPERO, Health Technology Assessments, PubMed, Campbell Collaboration, Joanna Briggs Library, PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL and Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH). Reference searching, Google Scholar, Grey Matters, IOSH and expert contacts will be used to identify grey literature. Two reviewers will screen title and abstracts, aiming for 95% agreement, and then independently screen full texts for inclusion. Two reviewers will assess methodological quality of included studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and extract and synthesize data in line with the RE-AIM framework, Nielson and Randall’s model of organisational-level interventions and Moore’s sustainability criteria, if the data allows. We will recruit and consult with international experts in the field to ensure engagement, reach and relevance of the main findings. Discussion This will be the first systematic scoping review to identify and synthesise evidence of barriers and facilitators to implementing mental health promotion interventions in workplace settings. Our results will inform future evaluation studies and randomised controlled trials and highlight gaps in the evidence base. Systematic review registration Research Registry ( reviewregistry897 )https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01570-9Barriers and facilitatorsRE-AIMWorkplaceMental health promotionImplementation scienceScoping review |
| spellingShingle | Charlotte Paterson Caleb Leduc Margaret Maxwell Birgit Aust Benedikt L. Amann Arlinda Cerga-Pashoja Evelien Coppens Chrisje Couwenbergh Cliodhna O’Connor Ella Arensman Birgit A. Greiner Evidence for implementation of interventions to promote mental health in the workplace: a systematic scoping review protocol Systematic Reviews Barriers and facilitators RE-AIM Workplace Mental health promotion Implementation science Scoping review |
| title | Evidence for implementation of interventions to promote mental health in the workplace: a systematic scoping review protocol |
| title_full | Evidence for implementation of interventions to promote mental health in the workplace: a systematic scoping review protocol |
| title_fullStr | Evidence for implementation of interventions to promote mental health in the workplace: a systematic scoping review protocol |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evidence for implementation of interventions to promote mental health in the workplace: a systematic scoping review protocol |
| title_short | Evidence for implementation of interventions to promote mental health in the workplace: a systematic scoping review protocol |
| title_sort | evidence for implementation of interventions to promote mental health in the workplace a systematic scoping review protocol |
| topic | Barriers and facilitators RE-AIM Workplace Mental health promotion Implementation science Scoping review |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01570-9 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT charlottepaterson evidenceforimplementationofinterventionstopromotementalhealthintheworkplaceasystematicscopingreviewprotocol AT calebleduc evidenceforimplementationofinterventionstopromotementalhealthintheworkplaceasystematicscopingreviewprotocol AT margaretmaxwell evidenceforimplementationofinterventionstopromotementalhealthintheworkplaceasystematicscopingreviewprotocol AT birgitaust evidenceforimplementationofinterventionstopromotementalhealthintheworkplaceasystematicscopingreviewprotocol AT benediktlamann evidenceforimplementationofinterventionstopromotementalhealthintheworkplaceasystematicscopingreviewprotocol AT arlindacergapashoja evidenceforimplementationofinterventionstopromotementalhealthintheworkplaceasystematicscopingreviewprotocol AT eveliencoppens evidenceforimplementationofinterventionstopromotementalhealthintheworkplaceasystematicscopingreviewprotocol AT chrisjecouwenbergh evidenceforimplementationofinterventionstopromotementalhealthintheworkplaceasystematicscopingreviewprotocol AT cliodhnaoconnor evidenceforimplementationofinterventionstopromotementalhealthintheworkplaceasystematicscopingreviewprotocol AT ellaarensman evidenceforimplementationofinterventionstopromotementalhealthintheworkplaceasystematicscopingreviewprotocol AT birgitagreiner evidenceforimplementationofinterventionstopromotementalhealthintheworkplaceasystematicscopingreviewprotocol |