Have we always been cyborgs? A critique of Stefan Lorenz Sorgner’s latest transhumanistic work

<p><span>Sorgner, Stephan Lorenzo. 2022. We Have Always Been Cyborgs. Digital Data, Gene Technologies, and an Ethics of Transhumanism. Bristol Univ</span></p><p>Streaming beyond humanism, transhumanism (an abbreviation for <em>transitional humanism</em>) is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nashwa Abdelkader Elyamany
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Academy Publishing Center 2022-09-01
Series:Insights into Language, Culture and Communication
Subjects:
Online Access:http://apc.aast.edu/ojs/index.php/ILCC/article/view/502
_version_ 1827128499870105600
author Nashwa Abdelkader Elyamany
author_facet Nashwa Abdelkader Elyamany
author_sort Nashwa Abdelkader Elyamany
collection DOAJ
description <p><span>Sorgner, Stephan Lorenzo. 2022. We Have Always Been Cyborgs. Digital Data, Gene Technologies, and an Ethics of Transhumanism. Bristol Univ</span></p><p>Streaming beyond humanism, transhumanism (an abbreviation for <em>transitional humanism</em>) is among the most prominent manifestations of how (emerging) techno-scientific advancements have questioned predominant doctrines concerning humanity and its very condition (Belk 2021a, 2021b; Hall 2017; Sorgner 2016, 2021, 2022; Wolyniak and Harrison 2015). It emerged in the mid-20th century and has become increasingly popular particularly in the United States and Western Europe (See the works of Fuller 2017, 2019; Hansell and Grassie 2010; Huxley 1968; Kurzweil 2005; Lilly 2008; More 2009; Moravec 1988). In essence, it is an intellectual historically changing movement that aims at emancipating humans from not only their psychic and corporeal constraints (through benevolent bio/nano technological enhancement, augmentation, and intensification) but the destructive impacts of the current humanist paradigm as well, via summits of Artificial Intelligence, bringing about life forms with significantly different characteristics other than human (For more detailed accounts, see the vignettes of its prominent forerunners, namely Kurzweil, More, Hughes, Vita-More, Minsky, Drexler, Moravec, and Bostrom).</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-12T01:40:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-701cdf070cec4b388cf68b8070c72585
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2812-4901
2812-491X
language English
last_indexed 2025-03-20T15:45:23Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Academy Publishing Center
record_format Article
series Insights into Language, Culture and Communication
spelling doaj.art-701cdf070cec4b388cf68b8070c725852024-09-02T22:46:58ZengAcademy Publishing CenterInsights into Language, Culture and Communication2812-49012812-491X2022-09-012214214710.21622/ilcc.2022.02.2.142217Have we always been cyborgs? A critique of Stefan Lorenz Sorgner’s latest transhumanistic workNashwa Abdelkader Elyamany0Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport (AASTMT)<p><span>Sorgner, Stephan Lorenzo. 2022. We Have Always Been Cyborgs. Digital Data, Gene Technologies, and an Ethics of Transhumanism. Bristol Univ</span></p><p>Streaming beyond humanism, transhumanism (an abbreviation for <em>transitional humanism</em>) is among the most prominent manifestations of how (emerging) techno-scientific advancements have questioned predominant doctrines concerning humanity and its very condition (Belk 2021a, 2021b; Hall 2017; Sorgner 2016, 2021, 2022; Wolyniak and Harrison 2015). It emerged in the mid-20th century and has become increasingly popular particularly in the United States and Western Europe (See the works of Fuller 2017, 2019; Hansell and Grassie 2010; Huxley 1968; Kurzweil 2005; Lilly 2008; More 2009; Moravec 1988). In essence, it is an intellectual historically changing movement that aims at emancipating humans from not only their psychic and corporeal constraints (through benevolent bio/nano technological enhancement, augmentation, and intensification) but the destructive impacts of the current humanist paradigm as well, via summits of Artificial Intelligence, bringing about life forms with significantly different characteristics other than human (For more detailed accounts, see the vignettes of its prominent forerunners, namely Kurzweil, More, Hughes, Vita-More, Minsky, Drexler, Moravec, and Bostrom).</p>http://apc.aast.edu/ojs/index.php/ILCC/article/view/502stefan lorenz sorgner
spellingShingle Nashwa Abdelkader Elyamany
Have we always been cyborgs? A critique of Stefan Lorenz Sorgner’s latest transhumanistic work
Insights into Language, Culture and Communication
stefan lorenz sorgner
title Have we always been cyborgs? A critique of Stefan Lorenz Sorgner’s latest transhumanistic work
title_full Have we always been cyborgs? A critique of Stefan Lorenz Sorgner’s latest transhumanistic work
title_fullStr Have we always been cyborgs? A critique of Stefan Lorenz Sorgner’s latest transhumanistic work
title_full_unstemmed Have we always been cyborgs? A critique of Stefan Lorenz Sorgner’s latest transhumanistic work
title_short Have we always been cyborgs? A critique of Stefan Lorenz Sorgner’s latest transhumanistic work
title_sort have we always been cyborgs a critique of stefan lorenz sorgner s latest transhumanistic work
topic stefan lorenz sorgner
url http://apc.aast.edu/ojs/index.php/ILCC/article/view/502
work_keys_str_mv AT nashwaabdelkaderelyamany havewealwaysbeencyborgsacritiqueofstefanlorenzsorgnerslatesttranshumanisticwork