Arthropod but not bird predation in ethiopian homegardens is higher in tree-poor than in tree-rich landscapes.
Bird and arthropod predation is often associated with natural pest control in agricultural landscapes, but the rates of predation may vary with the amount of tree cover or other environmental factors. We examined bird and arthropod predation in three tree-rich and three tree-poor landscapes across s...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2015-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126639 |
| _version_ | 1819123294263050240 |
|---|---|
| author | Debissa Lemessa Peter A Hambäck Kristoffer Hylander |
| author_facet | Debissa Lemessa Peter A Hambäck Kristoffer Hylander |
| author_sort | Debissa Lemessa |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Bird and arthropod predation is often associated with natural pest control in agricultural landscapes, but the rates of predation may vary with the amount of tree cover or other environmental factors. We examined bird and arthropod predation in three tree-rich and three tree-poor landscapes across southwestern Ethiopia. Within each landscape we selected three tree-rich and three tree-poor homegardens in which we recorded the number of tree species and tree stems within 100 × 100 m surrounding the central house. To estimate predation rates, we attached plasticine caterpillars on leaves of two coffee and two avocado shrubs in each homegarden, and recorded the number of attacked caterpillars for 7-9 consecutive weeks. The overall mean daily predation rate was 1.45% for birds and 1.60% for arthropods. The rates of arthropod predation varied among landscapes and were higher in tree-poor landscapes. There was no such difference for birds. Within landscapes, predation rates from birds and arthropods did not vary between tree-rich and tree-poor homegardens in either tree-rich or tree-poor landscapes. The most surprising result was the lack of response by birds to tree cover at either spatial scale. Our results suggest that in tree-poor landscapes there are still enough non-crop habitats to support predatory arthropods and birds to deliver strong top-down effect on crop pests. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-22T07:06:04Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-70295c3f71ea4db58682d66729648163 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-22T07:06:04Z |
| publishDate | 2015-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-70295c3f71ea4db58682d667296481632022-12-21T18:34:40ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01105e012663910.1371/journal.pone.0126639Arthropod but not bird predation in ethiopian homegardens is higher in tree-poor than in tree-rich landscapes.Debissa LemessaPeter A HambäckKristoffer HylanderBird and arthropod predation is often associated with natural pest control in agricultural landscapes, but the rates of predation may vary with the amount of tree cover or other environmental factors. We examined bird and arthropod predation in three tree-rich and three tree-poor landscapes across southwestern Ethiopia. Within each landscape we selected three tree-rich and three tree-poor homegardens in which we recorded the number of tree species and tree stems within 100 × 100 m surrounding the central house. To estimate predation rates, we attached plasticine caterpillars on leaves of two coffee and two avocado shrubs in each homegarden, and recorded the number of attacked caterpillars for 7-9 consecutive weeks. The overall mean daily predation rate was 1.45% for birds and 1.60% for arthropods. The rates of arthropod predation varied among landscapes and were higher in tree-poor landscapes. There was no such difference for birds. Within landscapes, predation rates from birds and arthropods did not vary between tree-rich and tree-poor homegardens in either tree-rich or tree-poor landscapes. The most surprising result was the lack of response by birds to tree cover at either spatial scale. Our results suggest that in tree-poor landscapes there are still enough non-crop habitats to support predatory arthropods and birds to deliver strong top-down effect on crop pests.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126639 |
| spellingShingle | Debissa Lemessa Peter A Hambäck Kristoffer Hylander Arthropod but not bird predation in ethiopian homegardens is higher in tree-poor than in tree-rich landscapes. PLoS ONE |
| title | Arthropod but not bird predation in ethiopian homegardens is higher in tree-poor than in tree-rich landscapes. |
| title_full | Arthropod but not bird predation in ethiopian homegardens is higher in tree-poor than in tree-rich landscapes. |
| title_fullStr | Arthropod but not bird predation in ethiopian homegardens is higher in tree-poor than in tree-rich landscapes. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Arthropod but not bird predation in ethiopian homegardens is higher in tree-poor than in tree-rich landscapes. |
| title_short | Arthropod but not bird predation in ethiopian homegardens is higher in tree-poor than in tree-rich landscapes. |
| title_sort | arthropod but not bird predation in ethiopian homegardens is higher in tree poor than in tree rich landscapes |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126639 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT debissalemessa arthropodbutnotbirdpredationinethiopianhomegardensishigherintreepoorthanintreerichlandscapes AT peterahamback arthropodbutnotbirdpredationinethiopianhomegardensishigherintreepoorthanintreerichlandscapes AT kristofferhylander arthropodbutnotbirdpredationinethiopianhomegardensishigherintreepoorthanintreerichlandscapes |